• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The electoral college has hardly anything to do with the party system in the US because it’s only used for presidential elections.

    Said parties literally choose the electors in the electoral college.

    If a third party was viable in FPTP then we should see a much larger share of them in Congress

    If a third party becomes viable and starts winning elections what typically happens is it will replace one of the other 2 parties, like when Whigs were replaced by Republicans.

    • sleep_deprived@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I should have been more clear - I meant that since the electoral college is only used for presidential elections, its existence does not (meaningfully) affect the viability of a third party since the vast majority of elections are not decided by it. 100% agree with what you’re saying.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thanks for elaborating. I agree, for a third party to successfully emerge in the US under our current system it would probably have the best odds if they started with local government.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In theory and over-simplified this would be true, in practice I think the way the electoral college has failed when 4+ candidates get into a tight election has lead to a lot of safeguards being created: The US political parties as institutions became more hostile to third parties and both the states and feds adopted laws more favorable to a two party system.

        Canada, & UK for instance don’t quite adhere to duverger’s law as strongly and in fact most non-US countries that still have fptp elections seem to have more diverse party systems.