floofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square306fedilinkarrow-up1563arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1550arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square306fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareKrauerking@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoSo states do have the right to set requirements to be on their ballot for a federal election in their state?
minus-squareDigitalFrank@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·1 year agoYes, as long as the requirements are uniform in every state and don’t discriminate against any particular candidate. SCOTUS affirmed that last part today.
minus-squareDem Bosain@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoThey’re not uniform. That’s the whole point of my post.
So states do have the right to set requirements to be on their ballot for a federal election in their state?
Yes, as long as the requirements are uniform in every state and don’t discriminate against any particular candidate. SCOTUS affirmed that last part today.
They’re not uniform. That’s the whole point of my post.