• SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    As a Stonemason, this shit always bothers me. Recent example was an article on stone henge. “Scientists still mystified as to how the stones were stood so that to caps were level!”

    Mfr! Give me a straight piece of wood, a length of string and a rock, I will make you a basic level. Don’t want to lift the stone in and out multiple times to adjust the level? Get logs and cut them to the same length as the upright stones. It’s not fucking rocket surgery!

    • Icalasari@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Trying to picture how you do this with those. Brain is stuck on hanging rock from wood with string which feels like I’m going the wrong way

      • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Drafting* class taught me that you can build any structure with just a T-square, a compass, a pencil, and some basic math.

        *As in the precursor to Computer-Aided Drafting. My school was cheap and didn’t let us use AutoCAD till the 2nd semester.

        But anyway, place the straight piece of wood across a gap. One end of the string goes around the middle of the wood, the other end hangs down where you tie the rock. You can visually tell with decent enough accuracy if the rock is hanging closer to one side (not level) or just straight down (level). If you can’t tell, get a longer string.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          some basic math.

          The pyramids at gizeh predate most of that. They predate algebra by some 800 years.

          Of course, despite Pythagoras not being born for some 2000 years, they DID have Rope stretchers to create square angles. They also had square levels and plumb bobs for making straight blocks and level surfaces.

          You don’t even need maths, just rope and gravity.

          • shuzuko@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mathematics

            “From 3000 BC the Mesopotamian states of Sumer, Akkad and Assyria, followed closely by Ancient Egypt and the Levantine state of Ebla began using arithmetic, algebra and geometry for purposes of taxation, commerce, trade and also in the patterns in nature, the field of astronomy and to record time and formulate calendars.”

            The first “true” pyramids were not built until ~2613. Prior to that it was all step pyramids, which are much less complex - just put a bunch of consecutively smaller squares in a stack. Even then, Djoser was started in ~2670, several hundred years after the “introduction” of basic math. Just because we don’t have extant physical mathematical texts surviving from that time doesn’t mean they didn’t know how to do math.

    • burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The thing is, its not about a single rock being precise. Its a 2 million ton monument that we are told is a tomb that was built in like 20 years. Thats about 1.7 million pounds per day, every day. It would take our trucks a fucking insane amount of time just dragging it into position, how did they have the time to cut it as well? For a tomb??? Somehow I feel we are not being told the whole story here…

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, it’s totally about a single rock being precise. That’s the name of the game son. If you don’t get the first stone precise, you can’t get the second one in precise. And there’s loads of different ways to move stone without trucks. I work in a conservation setting, and we use modern machinery as little as possible. If these scholars would bother asking anyone with actual experience in the field they’d get some answers to their questions.

        Also what’s with the Ancient Aliens bs at the end there?

        • burgersc12@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Its a tomb that was built in 20 years by some guy? Its not ancient aliens, but i have a feeling that the pyramid had a use, not just as some big building. Don’t have to agree, but keep an open mind when looking at it

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Well, honestly i have no idea, just seems crazy for everyone to be like “we know what it was used for because some guy in the 1800s said so”

                • burgersc12@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  The great pyramid is “assumed” to have had a mummy by people in like 900ad no mummies, just more mysteries. Why is the only mummies we find in the three pyramids from a woman, and a man from 2000 years after they were built? The evidence for the royal tomb hypothesis is surpisingly thin. If you think about what we actually see when we look at the pyramids, they are feats of engineering on the scales of which were not seen again until the 1800s. It is insane to me that we think we have any idea how or why the pyramids came to be based on the very minimal amount of evidence we do have on their construction. Not to mention the mysteries of some of the design choices i.e. menkaure casing stones

    • rab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some episodes are good, the one with Dave Mustaine for example

      • Agrivar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you want to run your fingers through liquid shit trying to find the scattered diamonds, I’m not gonna stop you - but is it really worth it?

        • rab@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          As a Megadeth fan it was surprisingly good. I’m not a regular viewer. Joe isn’t smart but I think he can be a good interviewer

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            He establishes a good rapport with guests. But sometimes he uses that to lull people into agreeing with some of his fucked up shit.

            He asked Coffeezilla (guy who does journalism about online scams) about trans rights. Coffeezilla rightly responded something like “I don’t know this isn’t something I’m an expert in.” The look on Rogan’s face was like, Eh I guess I didn’t get you on that one.

            And it’s weird how he tries to create controversy. He’s already the #1 podcaster, why is he doing these underhanded tricks to stir up controversy to gain notoriety?

            It was a better show when he was just a dumb guy talking to smart people. That was a lot of fun. Don’t know why he didn’t just stick with that.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Before the move to Spoopify it was legitimately one of the best podcasts. Rogan has always been a moron and the juxtaposition of that against actual smart guests was so much fun. Then professionally offended fuckwits decided his opinion was worth … anything … and it all went downhill from there.

      • papabobolious@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I never regarded him as very smart but he did have interesting guests and good banter, typically. A while before the Spotify buy I thought the quality worsened a lot and he would keep letting his politics shine through too much.

        I liked when Bill Burr said he (Joe) couldn’t rollerskate because his knuckles would drag on the ground in regards to Joe speculating on Covid without any real qualifications.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yup. I used to watch on YouTube occasionally when he had someone interesting, and occasionally Rogan would ask an interesting question.

          But I’ve never valued his opinion much. Why would I? He’s an ex-MMA fighter with a microphone, he’s unlikely to have a unique perspective vs the hordes of people with actual credentials online. I’m not saying being an MMA fighter is bad, just saying it doesn’t qualify you on any topic other than MMA.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            He was never really an MMA fighter. He may have done some low-level amateur fights or whatever, but his background is comedian and actor. Newsradio… one of the best sitcoms ever, though not because of Rogan (he was just an everyman kind of character) but because of Phil Hartman.

            He’s just a big fan of MMA. Though he probably has been punched in the head a fair amount in amateur fights.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ok he’s finally triggered me. As an engineer, no. We absolutely can build pyramids. At least technologically. Financing it isn’t happening. But we can build pyramids on the size of the great pyramid without modern technology even. It’s impressive sure, but it’s not like people of the past were idiots, they just had less tools at their disposal, and better tools are great for inventing even better tools.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s actually a belief that the pyramids weren’t built by slaves, but rather paid workers during the seasons when fields couldn’t be worked.

        In the modern era we’d call it a job program.
        Government needs something done, unemployed workers need to be kept busy for social order, and fed so they’re ready when the fields are workable again.

    • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I’m so tired of hearing that “We can’t build the pyramids even with the technology of today” because that’s just a bullshit statement with nothing supporting it. It is just to try to dismiss actual reality in order to prop up “It was aliens obviously” that has zero evidence.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Right wingers have nothing but bullshit statements with nothing supporting them. They operate on the principle that they can produce bullshit faster than reasonable people can debunk it.

  • StephniBefni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    My boyfriends grandmother loves to watch shows like ancient aliens and stuff. Normally I just ignore them as background noise, but sometimes I’ll catch something, shake my head and move on.

    One time though she was watching the one with William Shatner, unexplained mysteries I think it’s called. And the person Shatner was talking too said “and there is no way we could build the pyramids today” and Shatner just said nodded and then said “why?” The guy mean mugged the shot outta him and they cut to a commercial. When it came back they were talking about something else. Really made me laugh.

    But like fr though, bass pro shop built a pyramid, we build crazy skyscrapers and have hundreds of building styles all over the world, I’m sure we could build a pyramid today if we had too.

  • flintheart_glomgold@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Meanwhile on YouTube some dude in nowhere America has a set of videos showing how he can lift, rotate, leverage and pivot massive stone blocks and an entire house using stone-age technology… ropes and wooden levers… by himself!

    Rogan appeals to people who want to hear that the world revolves around them. They believe and want to confirm that if they haven’t figured it out no one else has. They are literal morons, but too stupid to know it. They are extremely satisfied when Rogan panders to their narcissism.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    There was a documentary I saw once where they used the best estimates for how long it took the Great Pyramid and how large the work force was and then scaled it down. Like if it took a work force of X people Y number of years to build the Great Pyramid, then a few dozen guys would be able to build a two storey tall pyramid in two months with the same technology.

    So they did that. And despite being inexperienced with the ancient technology and having to figure out how to push these massive stone blocks on rollers and make the corners around a spiral ramp winding around the pyramid, they got their little pyramid done on time. The math all checks out on people being able to build the pyramids provided they had a large enough workforce and enough time to do it.

    Yes the Pyramids are impressive but it’s because it took a lot of work over a lot of time to build them. But it required no special technology. Just a lot of dudes pushing heavy blocks on rollers up a ramp over many years.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes the Pyramids are impressive but it’s because it took a lot of work over a lot of time to build them.

      That’s the impressive thing. Their society had enough spare food that they could “waste” trillions of calories this way. It’s hundreds of thousands of people doing nothing productive (for the survival of themselves or for others) for years on end. And, it happened thousands of years BCE.

      Until just a few hundred years ago, 90% of people worked in jobs related to farming. So, to support 100,000 people building pyramids, they would have needed something like 900k farmers. That’s a million people dedicated to this project for a full generation.

  • juxta@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    From what i have learned the technology to build the pyramids was actuall extremely low tech, and i dont mean slaves and chisles, i mean strings, honey, and tuning forks for the cutting of stone. For transportation they used vibrations to move the stone along magnetic lines in the earth.

    Its not ancient high tech, its simply forgotten or suppressed low tech.

    • Embargo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Never heard the vibration thing. That’s pretty sick. I have heard of animal fat though.

  • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Pyramids are the easiest structure to build. You stack rocks. Want them to look nice, cut the rocks into bricks.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Technically we can’t send people to the moon anymore but that’s not really relevant to whether or not we can build a pyramid because one of them requires special technology and the other requires a general purpose crane

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            We could send people to the moon, we haven’t lost the knowledge or resources needed. It’s just that it’s no longer a priority. It was incredibly expensive the first time. Although it would be less expensive the second time, this is a case where there’s absolutely no justification for not working from home (i.e. using robots).

            • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              we haven’t lost the knowledge or resources needed

              Yeah its not that simple. Knowledge is pretty much lost in terms that there is not any easy or practical way to reconstruct for example the computer that navigated the Apollo and assume that this will provide a flawless trip. This hardware is also outdated so it would had been dumb to attempt to reconstruct something so many decades old. Also the code that run there was coded for this specific hardware which makes it unsuitable for modern hardware. So yeah, the knowledge exists in archives but is not really usable as is

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I don’t know why you’re talking about Apollo hardware and software. The programmers and engineers who wrote that stuff did it from well known scientific and engineering principles. They didn’t have to start with a previous moon mission. The scientific and engineering principles are even better known today, and we have much more experience for space flight.

                The only advantage you’d have with Apollo era stuff is that it has been tested and the bugs are well known. But, so what? Any modern mission to the moon would start from first principles again, not by trying to extend the Apollo stuff.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        impossible to measure accurately

        By some idiot hosting a conspiracy theorist website.

        Actual physicists find it quite easy.

        Distance of the Earth to the Moon? Easy as

        Until the late 1950s all measurements of lunar distance were based on optical angular measurements: the earliest accurate measurement was by Hipparchus in the 2nd century BC.

        Done with nothing the Egyptians didn’t have.

        Oh btw once you work out the distance you can easily calculate Earths diameter.

        Since you believe websites that look like the early 90’s shat them out I have some crypto to sell you, it was invented by the Lizard people in a joint venture with the Grey aliens.