I’m just curious for the new or existing people? Lemmy.ml has taken a hard turn to the right since the reddit exodus. There’s been a lot of pro-imperialist propaganda being posted on world news, and a lot less diversity of opinion. It feels more neoliberal and neo-con to me.

Does anyone want to share what their political leanings are?

I’ll start; I’m anti-imperialist pro-state regulated capitalism. I believe we should have usage based taxes (toll roads, carbon tax) and luxury taxes, and I disagree with wealth taxes for people with less than $250 million. The state should spend more money on consumer protection in all industries (environment, health, finance, etc.) I believe in multipolarity vs. US hegemony.

  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    fluid is good except that it also means easy for politicians to manipulate. and zero loyalty for longterm goals that require patience and sacrifice.

  • [email protected]@lemmy.federate.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I am a Social Democrat in the European sense. There is nothing wrong with the free market per se, but it is the responsibility of the state to intervene with regulation where necessary (e.g. safety), and the responsibility of the state to provide a stable system of social services, e.g. health care, education, housing.

    I’ll point to Austria as an example, where social housing is widespread and high quality and public health care is exceptional and pensions are reasonable. With this backdrop, the market economy is appropriate.

    I don’t think the unregulated capitalism of countries like the US is sustainable nor would I want to live under that dysfunctional system.

  • bren42069@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i’m a radical extremist voluntaryist anarchist. I believe that if it’s not voluntary, it’s slavery, thus government is slavery. I believe that all transactions between people should be consensual. I believe that people have a right to do what they want as long as they don’t cause damage to anyone. I don’t believe anyone has the right to attack anyone else, to force them to do something they don’t want to do or force them to stop doing something that they want to do if it’s harming no one. but I believe that it is every person’s right and duty to protect themselves against aggression, to whatever extent is necessary to make the aggressor stop.

    these principles are timeless and are so simple that even a child can understand them. if everyone started living this way, the world would be set free.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have no idea what box I fit into.

    • I am generally anti-capitalism. The current system does not benefit human. We are constantly exploited in the name of profits
    • vital industries and services need to be nationalized. Capitalism is a race to the bottom when it comes to providing the bare minumum, cutting corners etc.
    • people should be free to do what they please as long as it doesn’t hurt other people. To this end, I am pro-inclusion of all walks of life, except for bigots.
    • we are rapidly running out of time to prevent an ecological apocalypse. Everything must be done to avoid it
  • Rick@thesimplecorner.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some of my friends think I’m an idealist but I’d argue that’s the point. I vote for whatever would allow us to get to the Star Trek: TNG version of earth. A Post Scarcity society where humans want to better themselves and their communities through each individuals pursuit of their interests unrestricted by any “system”. To get there, I care about improving the lives of the entirety of humanity equally while doing away with the disparity inequality we see. It is undoubtedly true capitalism did raise the average QOL of many many people of the entire world, however, others it put into modern slavery.

    • nachtigall@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like this idea, but I disagree with the last sentence. The improvement in the average quality of life does not come from the capitalist system, but from technological and scientific progress.

      • Rick@thesimplecorner.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But was that also spurred at least in part often times for the pursuit of profit? I don’t disagree, you have a good point!

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Consider how quickly USSR developed after the revolution. It went from an agrarian society to being the first in space while doing most of the work in WW2. USSR accomplished a century’s worth of capitalist development in a few decades.

  • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What happened on lemmy.ml? That place is moderated by tankies with their finger on the ban trigger, so I am skeptical if you mean “hard turn to the right” or “normal people calling out the propaganda that my echo chamber used to shield me from.”

    To answer the question, I’m a radical anarchist, no state, no money, no bosses, no landlords, no compromises.

    • Abel@lemmy.nerdcore.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you want to discuss some things? I don’t want to just come rushing in with a political post :tm: but I’m interested in the abortion part.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Remember when the compromise was safe, legal, and rare? Now people practically use abortion as birth control.

            • Abel@lemmy.nerdcore.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Hey, go out and speak to people with uterus, because they aren’t using it as birth control.

              Really. No “hard facts” out of that. Your worldview is so distant from mine we can’t hold a dialogue.

              Just go out and speak to them.

              • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Looking at the stats from the CDC about 16% of pregnancies are aborted. All I want is for there to be less people proud of having had an abortion, or at least for less people to find that stance appropriate.

  • Lets_taco_bout_it@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just conservative not a republican because I feel they’ve lost their way as much as democrats did.

    Elephants and asses, screwing the masses.

    • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As I’ve gotten older I find myself being more of a conservative in the true definition of the term: a preference for slow and steady change, caution towards new ideas, and some amount of reverence for tradition.

      The issue is that the Republican party is not a Conservative Party. Joe Biden is a Conservative. The Republican party is a party for Reaction and Neoliberalism.

      • Tyrannosauralisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, very much this. As a scientist, my place on the political spectrum ought to be looking at a proposed change that is supposed to help and demanding “prove it” (and providing said proof when possible within my field). The hard part is then being ready to accept proof when given and swap my stance accordingly from opposition to agreement. This is where conservatives have failed. (People also need to accept that in the real world it’ll probably be imperfect proof and come up with reasonable expectations for what counts as adequate proof, ideally based on expert review.)

        But at this point there are many good ideas (like housing-first approaches to homelessness) that are well supported by data but are being held back because of “common sense” and emotions (we can’t just give people free housing!). So instead my place is sitting with the Progressives and saying “holy shit, how can we get conservatives to listen to reason?”

        • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As funny as it seems to say, I feel that “Conservativism” is unfairly maligned. Most of the bad things about what is called “Conservativism” are not really parts of Conservativism at all but are ideologies associated with Conservativism - “Rugged Individualism”, Neoliberalism in general, religious fundamentalism.

          We’ll probably disagree on this point (and that’s okay), but you can look at China. China is a very conservative country, with strong cultural values regarding family, social conformism, and civic nationalism. It is Conservativism without Capitalism, Individualism, or Religion.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a Marxist-Leninist, I believe that the means of production should be owned by the workers and that the purpose of work is to produce things we all need to meet our collective needs.

    Capitalism is a dead end ideology which leads to concentration of wealth in the hands of a tiny minority by design, and this minority of oligarchs exploits the rest of the people to subsidize their lavish lifestyle.

    Furthermore, any system based around constant growth and consumerism is fundamentally incompatible with our continual survival as a species. We need a system that strives for sustainable use of our resources.