• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I don’t know if they reclassified it at some point, but back on those days 3.5 was titled “Windows for Workgroups” and 4.0 was the first to be known simply as “NT”.

    Forget what I said, I recalled an old memory from childhood of a 3.5 upgrade box for people running Windows for Workgroups.

    NT 4.0 is definitely what popularized that version prior to Windows 2000 and XP. Most people who just say “Windows NT” are thinking about 4.0.

    • BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      3.11 was WfW, and ran on top of DOS just like 3.1 did.

      NT 3.51 used the NT kernel, and (mostly) looked like 3.1/3.11 on the surface. NT 4 used the NT kernel, and (mostly) looked like Win95.

      Win 95/98/Me also ran on DOS, though it was more tightly integrated than it was in the 3.1 days.

      Win 2k and everything after was based on NT.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I remember the early win 3.11 to win 95 days when it was still easier to exit to dos to install a lot of software because no one was writing windows interfaces for anything.

        Now I’m wondering if I still have my Doom .WADs saved somewhere…