• conductor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, you’re wrong. Conscription is always wrong. If fighting is justified you won’t need to do it.

    • CheezyWeezle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Cool so I can come in to your house and steal all your shit, beat up your children, and shoot your dog, and you aren’t allowed to fight back because if it was justified, you wouldn’t need to?

      EDIT: I seem to have misinterpreted the comment, as you appear to be referring to conscription being unnecessary rather than the fighting. Taking the whole context of the comment supports that, but taking only the context of the final sentence makes it appear that you are saying “if fighting is justified you dont need to fight” rather than “if fighting is justified, conscription is unnecessary”

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        they mean ‘it’ as in conscription, thwyre saying if the fight was worth it you wouldnt need to conscript

        • conductor@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Correct, thanks. I guess I could’ve phrased it better but it was worth it for that dudes completely unhinged reply.