jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoTrump-loving gays say their MAGA support is ruining their liveswww.lgbtqnation.comexternal-linkmessage-square274linkfedilinkarrow-up1706arrow-down113
arrow-up1693arrow-down1external-linkTrump-loving gays say their MAGA support is ruining their liveswww.lgbtqnation.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square274linkfedilink
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down26·1 year agoSo do you have a link or somewhere I can learn more about your domestic terrorist organization?
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down17·1 year agoSo you keep this information stored on your local computer? Isn’t it dangerous?
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down18·1 year agoWho am I jerking off here?
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoThe rest of the conversation is missing, but you seem to be looking for volunteers to be jerked off by you?
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·1 year agoNo the person that removed their comments advocating for violent activities said I should find someone else to jerk off.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoYou were jerking them off for advocating violence? That is one weird kink you’ve got there.
minus-squarememfree@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up23·1 year agoReminds me of a piece that is gone – but the below rephrase comes from here: https://mstdn.social/@ZhiZhu/109502665651546617 "The Paradox of Tolerance disappears if you look at tolerance, not as a moral standard, but as a social contract. If someone does not abide by the contract, then they are not covered by it. In other words: The intolerant are not following the rules of the social contract of mutual tolerance. Since they have broken the terms of the contract, they are no longer covered by the contract, and their intolerance should NOT be tolerated."
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoI like that. That’s a helpfully consistent way of framing it.
deleted by creator
So do you have a link or somewhere I can learn more about your domestic terrorist organization?
deleted by creator
So you keep this information stored on your local computer? Isn’t it dangerous?
deleted by creator
Who am I jerking off here?
The rest of the conversation is missing, but you seem to be looking for volunteers to be jerked off by you?
No the person that removed their comments advocating for violent activities said I should find someone else to jerk off.
You were jerking them off for advocating violence? That is one weird kink you’ve got there.
Reminds me of a piece that is gone – but the below rephrase comes from here: https://mstdn.social/@ZhiZhu/109502665651546617
"The Paradox of Tolerance disappears if you look at tolerance, not as a moral standard, but as a social contract.
If someone does not abide by the contract, then they are not covered by it.
In other words: The intolerant are not following the rules of the social contract of mutual tolerance.
Since they have broken the terms of the contract, they are no longer covered by the contract, and their intolerance should NOT be tolerated."
I like that. That’s a helpfully consistent way of framing it.
deleted by creator