Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoTrump Allies Warn Him: Underestimate Kamala at Your Perilwww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up1217arrow-down17
arrow-up1210arrow-down1external-linkTrump Allies Warn Him: Underestimate Kamala at Your Perilwww.rollingstone.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squareInternetUser2012@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoYou aren’t remembering correctly then.
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThat hack was popular, but not a good analyst: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/05/04/qa-political-polls-and-the-2016-election/ Not only were the national polls within 2% of the final total, the last series of state polls going into election day had a very obvious trend line:
minus-squareInternetUser2012@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo what you’re saying is almost like polls don’t really matter, thanks for proving my point.
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOf course the polls don’t matter. National elections don’t even matter. But that’s no excuse for being surprised about the results.
You aren’t remembering correctly then.
That hack was popular, but not a good analyst:
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/05/04/qa-political-polls-and-the-2016-election/
Not only were the national polls within 2% of the final total, the last series of state polls going into election day had a very obvious trend line:
So what you’re saying is almost like polls don’t really matter, thanks for proving my point.
Of course the polls don’t matter. National elections don’t even matter. But that’s no excuse for being surprised about the results.