• Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sounds to me like all advertisers should just assume that on Xitter, their ads will show alongside Nazi/Alt-Right/Hateful content. GARM, the project that Elmo just killed, used to inform them when that sort of thing happened. So with the warning system down, Ad companies should revert to a fail-safe state and abandon the platform completely.

    And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

    • axh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots

      Good idea, but stopping using xitter completely would be even better.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

      This is the way

  • schema@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even if this group shuts down completely, all this does is waste twitter’s money while it also tells advertisers to stay the fuck away from ever do any business on Twitter.

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      I read this similarly. Most significantly, advertisers in the group are probably less likely to spend on tweeter now. The complete opposite of Elen’s goal. The advertisers simply “deleted” the group (not any actual ad agencies), because it was calculated to cost the least. The group, GARM, was an attempt to collectively manage harm to their brands, which they will obviously continue to do in other ways.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      And now he has to sue the advertisers individually if he wants to continue this idiotic plan. That’ll surely convince people to spend money on X

  • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    I feel like this will only hurt him in the long term, advertisers in general are probably more likely to avoid X in the future. I know I would.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      More economically to shut down and reincorporate than to spend a bunch of money on lawyers.

      But I doubt Musk is going to see a flood of new ad revenue out of this.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        3 months ago

        new ad revenue

        I’m no marketing guy, and all other things aside, signing an advertising agreement with X would be a hard “NO” after this suit.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe it’s a Win win. Less advertisers and Elon looks like a psychopath and disuades further ad income for his hate platform

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Musk: starts allowing Nazi shit on Xitter

    Advertiisers: Hey, we don’t like Nazi shit. We might stop advertising if that keeps happening.

    Musk: Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.

    Advertisers: stop doing business with the guy who told them to go fuck themselves

  • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    92
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good. They don’t get to fucking bully whoever they want.

    Elon didn’t like their shit, and called them on it.

    And they fucking cried and gave up, right away. lmao

    • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      A multi-billion dollar social media company sued an ad industry group that was trying to have help companies have some kind of brand safety standards to prevent a company’s ads from appearing next to objectionable content. They reportedly had two full-time staff members. This isn’t some big win, it’s bullying itself.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      you hate people bullying people yet you love elon bullying a non profit into silence?

      also this isn’t going to bring advertisers to twitter.

    • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey

      You aren’t advertising with me. Stop bullying me and give me money.

      If you don’t give me money right now, you’re bullying me.

        • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What did he win? They aren’t going to resume advertising with him. They got out of the lawsuit without having to pay lawyers or change their behavior. What did he win?

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            54
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            So do you honestly think he just wanted their money?

            You don’t think that Elon Musk is over there laughing because they dropped the lawsuit, and thinking that he’s top dog cuz they went away?

            Have you seen his ego?

            I mean, I like Elon, but he’s def a slave to his ego. I still like him, but come on…lol

            He started a legal fight with someone, they backed down. Money losses or not, he definitely won. Because they dropped.

            And he is grinning.

            I mean, I def would prefer money. But I don’t think that’s always his goal.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t get it. Elon didn’t win a thing, he lost harder.

      He complained advertisers were banding together and boycotting his platform. He starts a frivolous lawsuit.

      So now even more advertisers are boycotting his platform.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      how do you mean? they just “hydra’d” on him. If he wants to sue them now for leaving xitter he will have to go after them individually.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wish Elon treated the whole planet like his children.

    He would just jet off and never communicate again, we would be free of this cancer for good.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    3 months ago

    He literally bullied a non-profit organisation set in the world to use advertisement money responsible into ceasing operations.

    Loss for the world once again, and the article even says that Republicans celebrated. That country is sick.

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    They are getting all this great free press about why to avoid Musk, must have figured their job is done.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s cheap to them and bankrupts their victims or forces them to settle. There should be a way to punish frivolous lawsuits by %income/assets.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are all the biggest snowflakes. The slightest criticism breaks their fragile egos. Billionaires really require a safe space.

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING.
    He didn’t shut down advertisers, he shut down an organisation for best practices in advertising.

    Wiki World Federation of Advertisers

    WFA’s aim is to champion effective and sustainable marketing communications worldwide. …

    …WFA formed the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a global cross-industry alliance which aims to improve digital safety and eliminate harmful online content…The alliance has introduced guidelines concerning misinformation and new standards on ad placements…

    …WFA is a founding member of the Unstereotype Alliance, UN Women’s flagship partnership with the marketing industry to eradicate harmful gender stereotypes in advertising…It is also a founding member of the Coalition for Better Ads, a cross-industry initiative to improve consumers’ experience with online advertising.

    WFA holds Global Marketer Week, a series of events bringing together brand marketers to learn about the latest public affairs issues and best practice in marketing.