• JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Am I the only one having a stroke trying to understand:

    “clears up again after the first wave of divorces (after 35?)”

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      yeah you are. it’s really easy to understand.

      the pool was clear before people got married. it clears up again after the first wave of divorces. clear meaning ‘there are desirable people to date’

      are you ESL?

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not OP, but I think it’s fairly confusingly worded because clear implies empty, but the intent seems to be to imply lots of choices.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          no. clear empties quality when it comes to water. clear as in transparent.

          clear water is good, opaque water is dirty and unsafe.

          you are thinking of clear in the sense of space, not water. clear space is empty.

          • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            I understand what you’re saying and I still think it would be easy to be confused. It’s ok that you don’t think it is, this is just a second opinion.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Clear, as in all the garbage has been cleared up, leaving the good stuff behind

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Seems plausible. Most of my friends got married or “like-married” between arround 28 and 32, then the divorces happened between arround 35 and 38. Those who survived that wave are still married.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    The real secret to dating after 35 - don’t.

    Folks are not looking to “date”: they’re after long term commitment OR quick hook ups. The middle ground really vanishes when you get older!

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes and no; I’ve met some people who were great to date but hell to live with.

        A good relationship starts with both people knowing what they want - and continual contact helps determine if the other person is being honest about what they want. Post 35/30, this process is often a lot faster, and dating skill matters less than ability not to annoy the person you’re suddenly around 24/7.

        If it matches from the start, or a compromise grows, you’re in for a winner. Otherwise, back to the sea of the undead you go, no matter how good your dating skill!

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s all dating is before 35 too. I mean what middle ground? Do you think people are going out with the intention of dating for a year or two?

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Intention and reality are two different things - although I can’t say I ever managed casual dating for 2 years! Usually most folks are in a relationship after 1.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sorry, no. Source: life experiences. It’s just you should clarify up front.

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think it goes further than that - post 35 (post 30 really) there is a lot more pressure to shift from casual dating to a relationship at a faster pace.

        Life experience talking here too, it isn’t just “being upfront”, it’s also being willing to move at a faster pace.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is where I have massive respect for gay guys who just use Sniffies for outright hookups and sometimes don’t even bother to learn the other guy’s name. Listening to drag queen podcasts has taught me a lot, and that a sex life can be pretty straightforward for gay guys.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The bigger problem is everyone has kids already. But by 45 or so you can start looking for people with adult kids.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      nobody has kids at that age in the urban coastal cities. i’m 40 i’ve never dated or met a single mother.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I had my first kid at 40, which was on the later side but not at all unusual.

        I came from a more rural area and occasionally here about people my age back there being grandparents already and just have to shake my head at those choices. It just doesn’t happen here

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I speedran adulthood and while on one hand I wish I had waited, on the other I’ll be in my mid 40s with an empty nest which is pretty sweet if you ask me

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          yeah i grew up rural and by mid twenties all my HS peers were married w/ kids or doing drugs/prison. I was in graduate school on the other side of the country at 25 and marriage kids was a decade away in my mind.

          least to i haven’t been back there since i was 19 years old and never kept any HS friends.

  • remer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know you’re not from the South because down there the first wave of divorces is at about 21 years old with three kids

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate how true this is.

      What’s worse is that many of the people who didn’t fall into that trap have been waiting to responsibly have children later, which I also don’t want. Finding anyone down here that is interested in being child free down here is a challenge and finding someone who doesn’t expect to have a busy life to make up for it is even more difficult.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And you know they’re not from NYC, LA, or SF - because there are tons of good looking single people over 35.

    • buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Marrying the first person you ever fuck and breeding uncontrollably only to become deeply miserable and unfulfilled in your locked down life is very human and not at all a good idea. Every success story of first love is a random aberration that fuels the myth that this should be the status quo.

      Most people are a lot sluttier than that

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Southerner here to confirm. I’m 36, graduated in 2004, I know a few people my age with 20 year olds now. 🙄

    • frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      No kidding. I’m apparently the only person who has ever had an amicable divorce where we just realized we weren’t compatible and never felt the need to bash each other. The post-divorce crowd can be pretty dire. They should mandate a certain number of therapy sessions before you can sign up for a dating app.

      • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I had one too. My ex and I are on great terms. It makes for some fun moments when we can joke about our divorce and make people uncomfortable.

      • Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dude, I hear that loud and f-ing clear. I’m also someone who left a marriage without any real hate toward my ex. We were chill during the marriage and afterward. No cheating; no drama.

        So when I re-entered the dating world a decade after I had previously been in it, I did not expect the amount of bitter dudes I’ve since come across. If your profile starts with you saying you won’t tolerate a woman who does ______., I’m more concerned about how damaged you are from your previous relationship than I am about whether or not we would be a good match.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        From what I’ve learned, it has a lot to do with attachment styles.

        My ex is avoidant, with some pretty narcissistic traits (love bombing, then refusal to even hug because it’s too much).

        I was/am anxious, or as the couples counselor told me “clingy.”

        In our one-on-ones, she summarized up a book we had been assigned (which my ex didn’t read lol) that it was a statistic thing. 50% of people are secure style - they meet, and tend to stay together cause it just works. ~25% are anxious, and they do ok together and work fine with secure. ~25% are avoidant, and unfortunately, unless they work towards secure attachments, are pretty much always in and out of relationships. There’s a small amount of “disorganized” that has both insecure styles, but they tend towards secure over time.

        The result is that the older you get, the dating pool shrinks. There will always been avoidant people available though. Secure style people are great at recognizing avoidant and typically don’t put up with their bullshit for long. Anxious attachment though end up with avoidants and it becomes a terrible thing, the anxious will do anything to stay, causing the avoidant to do things out of the relationship more.

        If you could guess one common thing amongst avoidants that finally ends the relationship, what would it be? If you said cheating, you’d be completely right. It’s really hard to end amicably after that.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Incels are on the rise, both genders. Where do they fit in your 100%? We’re seeing the birth of hikkikomori culture.

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If I had to guess based on my understanding of attachment theory, it could be the anxious attachment, the avoidant, or the disorganized (which has traits of both, and is rare). In any case it’s clearly the insecure attachment styles.

            Based on the “incel” description itself though, I don’t think you have enough information to guess either. An individual hokkikomori is clearly more avoidant than anything though, as they don’t seek or hold relationships with others as valuable.

              • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Wait I’m confused - you asked where they fit in the 100%. I gave you my best guess.

                What does that have to do with spreadsheets?

                • Entropywins@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  What do incels and Excel have in common?

                  They both wrongly assume somethings a date when it’s not!

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        what i don’t get is why people married people they knew were awful people, or awful for them.

        anytime someone lies, cheats, or steals from me (or shows any disrespect, like verbal/physical abuse) i dump their ass.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          My ex was a chill stoner with a good work ethic when we got together and we had many good years, then he lost job after job, stopped looking, got radicalized reading Stormfront, then eventually physically abusive. I could not convince him to seek help, since he got so paranoid.

          People change, sometimes you change in opposing directions.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            that isn’t change, that’s failure to take responsibility for yourself. which makes for a shitty person, and a shitty partner.

            hence why most radicalized people are shitty human beings. de-radicalizing requires people to realize they are responsible for their choices, and that the world is not some external force oppressing them.

            • RBWells@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Well it was a change, but I don’t disagree. Instead of trying, he just looked for someone to blame. It’s not like there aren’t external forces but our own actions and thoughts are what we can control, and can make a big difference. He’s doing better now, too late for us but he’s working, paid child support, stopped drinking, still a racist fuck but realized he was his biggest problem and did work on himself.

    • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find it much easier!

      • People are less shy
      • They have more experience
      • They know better what they are looking for
      • Their fantasy marriage/life has been renounced
      • People are much more chill about sex matters
      • Their romantic histories are quite telling
      • Most people have their own place
      • Careers are mostly stable

      /

      Cons

      • Much smaller dating pool
      • Many have kids already
      • More difficult to make friends/meet people in general
        • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not OP, but I was sterilized in my mid 20s. Not only am I not interested in having kids, but I would not be a good parent. I have still dated people with kids who made it clear there would never be an expectation that I become a parent or interact with their kids, which does address those issues, but there are others. Understandably their kids take priority over basically everything except for maybe the factors that effect their ability to provide for their kids (or at least I think they should). That often means they don’t have nearly as much time to hang out and build a connection, nor are they able to be as free to do other things due to constraints on their time, finances, or both like going on fun trips. Another factor I have run into that is that usually the reason someone is single and has kids due to entirely positive reasons, and there is often at least some amount of trauma in their past that is often not entirely behind them.

          To be clear the above is in no way an absolute and are merely my anecdotal experience and correlations in the given area I live. It is also always worth keeping in mind that I am in no way perfect myself and that it’s possible there is something about me that results in the above being my experience.

        • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It introduces more factors to consider. One, the kids will be involved in the relationship, so that’s more people that have to get along well. Two, they take up time, energy, and resources that could otherwise go to the relationship. Three, the parents are more anchored to their current life, so things like going on vacation or moving become much more complex and expensive. Four, the person will almost certainly have to maintain a relationship with their ex/other parent of the children. Five, if you yourself want to have kids, they may not be willing to do so anymore.

          I acknowledge that having kids has its benefits too though. It’s not all bad.

        • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ahhh they are inextricably linked to a previous partner and you’re expected to become a parental figure if the relationship goes anywhere serious.

          Some people (like me) really don’t want an instant family.

          I take my hat off to those who don’t have kids but date parents; they are better people than I.

          • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I wouldn’t mind doing it, but I would have to know the partner really well and feel confident that it would be a stable relationship. I remember having a hard time as a kid when I lost my aunt because her and my uncle had a nasty divorce where she went no contact.

            Pros of dating a parent:

            • You can see how they treat those that are vulnerable and dependent on them
            • They’re typically more stable, conscientious, and responsible
            • Good parents know that they have to model healthy behavior, so they practice those
            • You already know what you are getting with the kids, so it’s not a surprise
            • The kids inadvertently tell on the parent if the parent is misrepresenting themselves up front
            • Can do family activities that would normally be considered odd for only adults to partake
            • The many benefits of being a parent
            • If there’s shared custody, you regularly get time off from being a parent
            • oatscoop@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Getting older, with an established career makes spontaneity harder as it is. Add kids to the mix and it’s pretty much impossible.

              I … don’t want that. I like making last minutes plans, 1-2 week long trips, etc. The most limiting factor for me is dropping off my cat at one of my many friends/family members that can watch it (and I reciprocate with their pets).

              If I’m going to date it’s going to be with someone with a compatible lifestyle.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        speak for yourself. i have found dating as a 30+ adult to be way more dramatic and miserable than it was in my 20s.

        nobody in my 20s was having a temper tantrum at dinner because the restaurant isn’t expensive enough for their ‘brand’.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            nah it’s multiple dates. it’s also a common attitude that men need to ‘impress’ dates by spending a lot at restaurants otherwise they ‘devalue’ a woman. asking someone out on a cheap date to get to know them isn’t the point… the point is to win them over by spending money on them.

            basically a lot of people see dating as prostitution with extra steps. and wonder why they are single.

            • Doesntpostmuch@possumpat.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Dude, I’ve been on many, many dates in my 30s. I have never experienced this in the least and I am a frugle date. I recommend reevaluating your “type” of women if this is a recurring thing.