There have been multiple reports on this issue indicating that you’re wrong and the previous claim was correct. But nobody knows for sure. If she had flipped positions, perhaps some people would have been turned off and they would have called her a flip-flopper.

And obviously there were many other reasons that she lost. We don’t get to blame it on just one.

Did she ever say that publicly? No. So she did not make the most of it.

“by mistake” … “by design”

Step 1: Don’t generalize. Don’t say “Americans” when you mean “some Americans”. As you can see from browsing here and on other media sites, there are a great many vocal people who have voted Democrat for years but are entirely disappointed by decades of failed DNC leadership.

Step 2: Remind people that everyone is on their own side. Politicians might vote the way you want, or not, but their interests will never be exactly the same as yours. Don’t ever believe that the two-party system is an accurate description of our values.

Step 3: Share memes of Schumer.

LibreOffice is solid, too.

Tried? That is boring. Stick with what we kept using.

No. You didn’t define either word. Probably they didn’t either. They want to equivocate – switch definitions of words without saying so – and this is classic sophistry.

Anyway, freedom alone is hard to define. What happens if your freedom (to punch people) and mine (not to be punched) conflict? Who wins? … So you can’t actually have 100% general freedom. But if you have a narrower definition, maybe you can say something constructive.

And crypto is all about theft. So let’s focus in that. If I send you money accidentally, because you tricked me, BitCoin has no robust refund procedure. So … you could say it is more free than a credit card (no credit card companies or banks in the middle), but the specific freedom is “freedom for fraudsters to steal more efficiently”. Is that what you as a small-time investor want? Did the lecturer spell that out to you? … I bet they didn’t.

He knows he was lying then. And now.

What a shit article. If you want to blame corrupt South African leaders, you need to actually do that. But targeting the country as a whole is classic bullshit victim blaming.

The ultra rich can go to hell.

Because the racist listeners are focused on the racism, not on the “leaders aren’t responsible for anything” part.

Well, he’s sure lowering the value of Tesla, so maybe you’re right.

War? Remember that we’re talking about nuclear war. That is possible of course, but many people with brains would try to stop Trump from starting it. Would they succeed? Who knows.

If troops do illegal shit, the U.S. judicial system is one of several places they could possibly be held accountable.

Who is “everyone” my friend? Do you mean “me”?

Or the DNC needs to be thrown to the wolves.

My friend, almost all of politics can be reasonably described as “performative nonsense”. If you want to bash the Dems, you can easily do so, but you’ll have to try slightly harder.

You contradicted yourself there. Clearly Bernie does many things, so … can you try that opening sentence again?

Don’t worry. He isn’t leading it.

Of course it would work. Come on, now.