• stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    The more time I spend with Linux the more I realize that Distro doesn’t matter, GUI doesn’t matter, experience doesn’t matter.

    Distro doesn’t matter because you will inevitably come across something that you need that doesn’t work on your distribution.

    GUI doesn’t matter because no matter what you do you will %100 have to use the terminal and if you can do it once you can do it again.

    Experience doesn’t matter because if you’re inexperienced you have to go outside your Comfort zone, if you’re experienced you got there because you like going outside your comfort zone and you will constantly stay in that state.

    • 474D@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      3 months ago

      WTF are you guys doing with your PCs??? I’ve been running Mint for over a year now and the only time I’ve used the terminal was to open a port for Chromecast. I browse, I game, I watch shows, etc. maybe I’m just really lucky, idk, it’s been nothing but smooth sailing.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        I personally use it to run a headless docker on fedora 40 server with containers holding jellyfin, filebrowser, pia, qBittorrent a desktop in noVNC a pfsense server, and probably some stuff I forgot.

        Why is that not a standard use case?

        But in all seriousness I guess I get your point.

      • bitfucker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same could be said for any other distro. I think his point is that when shit just works, nothing makes a difference between distro. Be it Arch, Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, Fedora, Gentoo

      • Parculis Marcilus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        3 months ago

        We have become philosophers of our own, as tweaking Linux has been a way to meditate our stressful mind to overcome the difficulty of touching grasses.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Meh, don’t worry about it. If you are happy with how it’s going for you - enjoy the ride! Not everyone needs to be bothered by the terminal. But it IS there if you need it or want to use it.

        Besides, if Arch users wanted to be be real gurus they’d be running EMACS and not Arch.

      • plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not exactly advanced, but I missed the super+P shortcut when switching from desk and monitor to sofa and TV. Made a couple of one line shell scripts that call Xrandr then bound them to keyboard shortcuts.

    • Lucy (she/them)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Experience doesn’t matter because if you’re inexperienced you have to go outside your Comfort zone, if you’re experienced you got there because you like going outside your comfort zone and you will constantly stay in that state.

      I was experimenting a lot during my early Linux months but then I found what works for me and settled with it. I don’t leave my comfort zone much anymore.

    • tentacles9999@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wish gentoo was more explored, I felt the same way and then it finally scratched the itch of things working (perhaps even too many options). I actually ended up using gentoo because it was less of a headache to just get things to work in a way that does not feel hacky

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Right?

        Gentoo is the best, every time kids scream about AUR I just chuckle to myself.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I moved to Arch about 20 years ago because I wanted Gentoo but I didn’t want to wait hours for compilation. I remember it fondly though. emerge was kind of a killer feature.

        Though I gotta say, I’m a bit more curious now that we have better processors. And I’m curious what I’ve missed over the years.

        • tentacles9999@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          With binary packages it’s actually doable on a laptop. Also newer laptops have tons of low power cores which are great for something highly parallel like compiling.

        • ZephrC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I tried out Gentoo for a while, and just using binaries for the web browser and office suite made the compile times a complete non-issue. The problem I had that made me give it up was that when there is software you want that isn’t in the official repos there are a thousand different ways of getting it, and all of them suck. Overlays are supposed to be the solution for that, but man that experience was just awful.

          I tried all kinds of things, but in the end all the options basically boiled down to risking breakage, maintaining my own packages, or not using emerge at all, which just feels like it’s defeating the whole purpose of being on Gentoo in the first place.

    • DaGeek247@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      That huge chunk of learning required for arch when you’ve never used Linux before is really hard to imagine when you have years of experience working Linux under your belt. That does not mean it doesn’t exist for new users though.

      That shit’s complex and long. Much as I appreciate the sentiment of “the distro doesn’t matter” I really can’t agree.

      • srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Arch was my first linux distro and it felt like being dropped in Vietnam. It was hard but it made me learn a ton really fast.

        Not recomended to everyone tho.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I realised the same thing.

      When I was switching from Windows to Linux on my PCs (both at home and at work), I originally wanted to use Debian because I’m most familiar with it and have been running it on servers for 20+ years.

      I have to use Fedora at work though - it’s a lightly-modified version of Fedora that runs some automatic configuration on first boot and first log in for things like ensuring disk encryption is enabled (including adding randomly-generated secondary keys for IT support), 802.1x certificates for Ethernet and VPN auth, Chef, endpoint security, etc.

      Anyways, I started using it and love it. I’m running it at home now too. I realised the difference between distros is much narrower than it used to be.

    • dimath@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yes and no for me

      Distro doesn’t matter because they only differ in package manager and initial configuration, you can always compile things if you really need it.

      GUI doesn’t matter because you’ll end up with all KDE and gnome dependencies installed anyway because your applications need it.

      Experience probably matters, but if it doesn’t, it may be because there is just so much there to know.