• Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why do that when you can provide jobs to the needy?

    Making people do work is inherently valuable even if it’s unnecessary, monotonous, pointless, soul crushing work, is it not?

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        He was not wrong, reducing shovel size is a great way to even out productivity to include those who would be otherwise unemployed.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s a false choice if I ever heard one. Surely reasonably-paced increases in productivity could spawn job creation in other areas? And while modern-day capitalism is not exactly encouraging this, maybe we can take advantage of less manpower needed to make society function by having less time working (with a similar quality of life) for all? If there were only so many employment hours available, there are ways of distributing that other than raising the unemployment rate or artificially lowering it.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        38
        ·
        3 months ago

        We can’t be feeding people who do no work. It is much better that they be put to it than have the task “solved” by some brainiac who would rob them of the fulfillment of employment.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          We can’t be feeding people who do no work.

          But we could.

          who would rob them of the fulfillment of employment.

          A boring job isn’t fulfilling and mental underload leads to burnout.

          There’s exactly one reason to do work: getting living money. If you can make a living from your hobby or your job is otherwise fulfilling, that’s nice for you.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would not joke about this, these are the serious affairs of adult men and women, who could and should do their best to contribute to our civilization.

            Where would we be as a society if those who craft advertisements were instead free to to roam about doing as they please all day? I’ll be dead before we are a nation of aimless frolickers.

              • Asafum@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 months ago

                They are absolutely trolling. Check the examples they use in their comments: “advertisers” and another comment pointed to “Mobil game development” specifically as important and useful work.

                Poes law at work with them, they’re pretty convincing that they are serious while still leaving little hints that they are messing around.

                • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Right? The “craft advertisements” was definitely the one that is for punctuation of their trolling but I’ll give it the downvotes they want.

            • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Aimless frolicking sounds like a great deal to me.

              Imagine how fit everyone would be if we could spend all day frolicking about instead of being at a desk 8+ hours a day.

              • howrar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Imagine all the science we could do if scientists didn’t have to worry about funding to stay alive.

                • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  We would have a much better world to live in, and scientists wouldn’t be pressured to only study things that can be immediately monetized.

                  Have you ever heard of orphan diseases? They’re conditions that are so rare that it’s not profitable to research them and find cures/treatment because the population of people who need it is so small.

                  Some countries counter this by using government funding to research rare diseases but the progress is much slower since the funding is limited.

              • Comment105@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                An intellectual exercises his mind primarily, his body is well served by half an hour.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You should get rid of your “work or die” mentality.

      We have plenty of resources. We don’t need it anymore.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Dear Tawk, I hope you’ll realize that we can not permit grown men to be like babes suckling their nation’s teet.

        They should rather be creative in their difficult situation, learn programming, contribute to the mobile gaming market. Make themselves useful.

          • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean some mobile games are fun, just not all of them. If we removed the profit motive they could be a lot more fun probably.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, there’s definitely a lot of professions that are completely pointless or even counterproductive.

              Receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, store greeters, lobbyists, corporate lawyers, telemarketers, public relations specialists, middle managers, literally every job in insurance. I could go on.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Standards used to be higher because they had to be. I get to relax a little, shoot from the hip.