The decision by Justice Juan M. Merchan means voters will be left in the dark about whether the former president will face time behind bars.

The judge overseeing Donald J. Trump’s criminal case in Manhattan postponed his sentencing until after Election Day, a significant victory for the former president as he seeks to overturn his conviction and win back the White House.

In a ruling on Friday, the judge, Juan M. Merchan, rescheduled the sentencing for Nov. 26. He had previously planned to hand down Mr. Trump’s punishment on Sept. 18, just seven weeks before Election Day, when Mr. Trump will face off against Vice President Kamala Harris for the presidency.

While the decision will avert a courtroom spectacle in the campaign’s final stretch, the delay itself could still affect the election, keeping voters in the dark about whether the Republican presidential nominee will eventually spend time behind bars.

MBFC
Archive

  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    133·
    2 months ago

    My bet would be that it’s to avoid influencing the election rather than riots.

    Whichever sentence he gives, it has the potential to make him more likely to win, thereby undermining the sentence.

    Personally, I’d like to see justice happen in a way that can be blind to that outside context, but we don’t live in that world.

    I don’t like it, but I get it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
      151·
      2 months ago

      it’s to avoid influencing the election

      He’s already been found guilty and nobody seems to care one way or the other. What’s sentencing going to change?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        72·
        2 months ago

        A prison sentence looks way more like political suppression than just “guilty but still speaking publicly”.

        Still don’t think it was the right thing to do, but I can see why a judge who has otherwise seemed same and nonpartisan would be inclined to make that choice.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            2·
            2 months ago

            Yup. :/

            I looked it up and it’s not unusual for sentencing in New York to take several months, but I would have been much happier if the political realities had pushed things to move faster.

            Having read the prosecutions response to the request for delay that basically said “everything the defense said justifying a delay was wrong, here’s why a delay would actually be a good idea”, it feels hard to blame the judge too much for granting the delay.
            Even though none of the reasons seem to be based on sound legal principles and are at best based on practical considerations.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            2·
            2 months ago

            Well, I don’t think anyone was saying don’t punish political candidates, least of all me.

            Being cognizant of a political context for an action just doesn’t seem unreasonable to me, even if it’s not how I think it should have played out.

            Whatever sentence is given will have an impact on the political landscape in which that sentence is carried out, which can potentially directly undermine the sentence.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
          73·
          2 months ago

          A prison sentence looks way more like political suppression

          He’s not getting a prison sentence. The judge in the trial straight up stated he did not want to put Trump in prison during the trial. He’ll get a fine, which he’ll be able to pay off with kickbacks from his friends, and the it’ll be back to business as usual.

          I can see why a judge who has otherwise seemed same and nonpartisan

          The judge is anything but nonpartisan. He’s very obviously conscious of what his career is going to look like under either administration, and he’s playing very carefully so as not to overly offend either party leadership.