Anti-Trump Republican stymied investigation of activist married to supreme court justice, says reporter David Brock

Liz Cheney, the Republican vice-chair of the House January 6 committee, did “all she could” to protect the rightwing supreme court justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, the political activist Ginni Thomas, by blocking an in-depth investigation of Ginni’s involvement in Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election, a new book says.

In Stench: The Making of the Thomas Court and the Unmaking of America, the reporter and Democratic operative David Brock writes that “two Capitol Hill sources with personal knowledge” revealed a “dramatic truth, which might shock even some jaded Washington veterans not easily surprised by callow examples of power protecting power.

“Liz Cheney herself, the star of the hearings, doing her turn as independent-minded maverick Republican, did all she could behind the scenes to protect Ginni and Clarence Thomas and thwart the move to investigate further the implications of the Ginni Thomas texts to [Mark] Meadows”, Trump’s final White House chief of staff.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    12·
    2 months ago

    “I really think we should listen to what Jeremy has to say. Sure, he gets drunk and challenges children to fight him at the playground, and yes he might be a tiny bit of an arsonist, and if you’re gonna nitpick then yes he stomps on pigeons in the park, but you don’t understand! I saw him accidentally knock over an old lady the other day and he apologized! Not only that, he made sure she was okay! I think he’s truly reformed and we should trust him now.”

    Also, I get why you said “pheasant” hunt and thought that was hilarious, but c’mon… If there were ever a time to bring up duck hunting, shouldn’t it be now by the infamous @[email protected]?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      2 months ago

      Also, I get why you said “pheasant” hunt and thought that was hilarious, but c’mon… If there were ever a time to bring up duck hunting, shouldn’t it be now by the infamous @[email protected]?

      I don’t want to get shot at… and these people might get the wrong idea.

      in any case… yes. that’s exactly what I mean. She did one right thing. that doesn’t make up for all the shitty crap also does.

      (for those wondering… her father went to an organized pheasant hunt, as VP, and accidentally wound up shooting one of his security detail in the face. It was “just” birdshot, so he didn’t die or anything. those sorts of events should be banned, though. Basically, they capture a shitload of pheasants, stage them in a space that’s “safe” to shoot at them… then scare them up so they fly over as rich fucks shoot at them. What probably happened is he got target fixation while the bird flew in a path that… well… ooooppsssies)

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        4·
        2 months ago

        Wait wait wait, now you’re just bungling the story tooooo much.

        • It was a quail hunt, not pheasant
        • Yes, security detail was there, but he didn’t shoot any of them. He shot a lawyer and the secret service helped him
        • The lawyer he shot also had a heart attack from one of the pellets getting close to his heart
        • The secret service claim they waited an entire fucking hour before notifying the local sheriff
        • The sheriff said they didn’t find out until the next day

        What probably happened is he got target fixation while the bird flew in a path that… well… ooooppsssies

        You forgot the best part of the whole “ooooppsssies”:
        The fucking lawyer later went on tv TO APOLOGIZE TO DICK CHENEY FOR HIS BAD PUBLICITY DUE TO GETTING SHOT IN THE FACE

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.caEnglish
        6·
        2 months ago

        I’m pretty sure it was a quail/dove shoot. It stood out for me because there aren’t many parts of the country where dove hunting is a thing. But Texas? You bet!