Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoStand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square44linkfedilinkarrow-up1934arrow-down17
arrow-up1927arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square44linkfedilink
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoLotRers. Fans of Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
deleted by creator
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.