• PEWPSHOOTPIRATE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol…people sayin mozilla goin downhill…they have been putting up a fake premise to the public for 10 years.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Man, Mozilla used to be nice but they have just turned so shit. I hope the core firefox people quit and make a new browser so that I can donate directly to the new browser instead of some middle man (or woman right now) who siphons off the money (aka Mozilla).

  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well running a server and no longer interacting with a service can be two different things. From an organizational standpoint I could absolutely understand them not wanting or needing the expense of another service to maintain. Even for just their own use. As long as they still have accounts and post to the fediverse. I don’t see a big issue

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’ll probably still have an instance in the sense that mozilla folks with have @mozilla.social addresses. That’s the kind of thing their hosting staff can easily administer on the side, and moderation is already covered by HR.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why? Doesn’t look like there’s any explanation for this move.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The trolls in the comment section at least hints at the fact that creating a more positive and constructive online space proved more difficult than they imagined.

      I was curious, and joined the queue for the closed beta a long time ago. Never heard back. They explored something new in closed channels, decided not to go for it, backed out. I don’t really think they need to justify the decision.

      Running a social media is a huge effort, and there’s a lot of trolls out there actively targeting Mozilla. I imagine it’s just more trouble than it’s worth.

    • Tamlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      174
      ·
      3 months ago

      The new CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers, already said on march she want to reduce investment for mastodon and other products (VR, VPN, Relay). So this is just another part in reducing cost on section that doesn’t produce money. I’m not surprised. Sadly i have only a german source for that and the soure of them, bloomberg has a paywall.

        • Tamlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So far it’s still online right, as well as vpn. At least those both service maybe generate money. Not sure what it means to invest less in those services.

        • Tamlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Maybe, not sure how much they have to pay to mullvad to use their server and developement. But hard to imagine vpn couldn’t generate money. (not sure about relay). Ant it’s still online. But at least, it doesn’t seem to be a priority.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Good. They should focus on their browser. No one wanted their side projects. It was scope creep and took away resources from their main product offering. Sounds like the right move.

        • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          3 months ago

          But then how do you make money with a browser if you aren’t getting Google money and don’t spy on users?

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I wanted some of their side projects. Their web-things iot automation controller (and related standards) was pretty sweet. Until they spun it off into its own company without any staff.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I hope thats what they will do but i very much doubt it. Looking at her track record makes me think that she has no good intemtions with mozilla.

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            They’re going to continue chasing the AI trend right up until the bubble bursts. At which point they’ll continue wasting money on the next big trend, assuming that the bubble bursting doesn’t kill Mozilla in the process.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          My understanding is that they are focusing on adding in “AI” features in a big way, and that’s why they cut development on the other work. 🫤

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              There’s already AI in firefox: The integrated translator. From what I’ve heard they’re looking into ingesting browsing history locally so that you can find stuff again easier.

              • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                What do you mean ingesting browsing history locally? For AI? I don’t want that. But I’d interested in your opinion and explanation though!

                • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Think like Microsoft recall for your browser history. Yeah that sounds awful, it’s not surprising why people would not want it. Just goes to show that Mozilla is dumb and blind like all other companies.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  So you can find things by “that spicy chicken recipe” instead of having to remember what it was actually called, or slog through a gazillion chicken recipes in your history when you realise that “spicy” was nowhere in the name. Basically stemming/thesaurus search on steroids.

                  It’s quite likely to be opt-in as I imagine ingesting the sites you’re looking at is a significant computational load. The translators are also opt-in, there’s enough stuff inbuilt to detect languages but not to translate, you have to download those models first. And they’re quite good btw.

                  Another thing I could see them offering is stuff like tl;dr bot. It’s probably not for everyone, but I definitely can see that it can be a useful feature for many people.

      • TheFool@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago
        Tap for Golem Article

        Mozilla baut Stellen ab und fokussiert sich neu

        Kommt die Wende bei Mozilla? Unter der neuen Chefin Laura Chambers startet Mozilla eine umfassende Reorganisation.

        Artikelveröffentlicht am 14. Februar 2024, 7:39 Uhr, Andreas Fischer

        Für Firefox könnten wieder neue Zeiten anbrechen.

        Für Firefox könnten wieder neue Zeiten anbrechen.(Bild: KI-generiert durch Bing Image Creator/Dall-E)

        Keine Woche nachdem die langjährige Mozilla-Chefin Mitchell Baker ihren Wechsel vom CEO-Posten auf den der Executive Chairwoman der Mozilla Foundation bekannt gegeben hat, baut das Unternehmen 60 weitere Stellen beziehungsweise etwa fünf Prozent der Belegschaft ab. 2020 verloren bereits 250 Mitarbeiter ihren Job bei dem Firefox-Anbieter.

        Der erneute Stellenabbau betrifft laut Bloomberg vor allem Mitarbeiter in der Produktentwicklung. Man wolle sich in Zukunft mehr auf Bereiche wie Firefox Mobile konzentrieren, in denen man die größten Erfolgschancen sehe, kündigte Mozilla an.

        Auf der anderen Seite werde man Investitionen in Produkte wie VPN, Relay sowie einen Dienst reduzieren, mit dem Anwender bei Datenbrokern über sie gespeicherte Daten löschen lassen können. Darüber hinaus will Mozilla seine 3D-Umgebung Hubs abschalten und weniger Aufwand bei seiner Mastodon-Instanz mozilla.social betreiben.

        KI und Firefox im Fokus

        Techcrunch veröffentlichte zudem ein internes Memorandum, in dem Mozilla ankündigte, sich künftig unter anderem mehr auf “vertrauenswürdige KI für Firefox” zu konzentrieren. Dazu werde man die Teams zusammenfassen, die sich bislang mit Pocket, Inhalten und KI beschäftigt hätten.

        Die Umstrukturierung erfolgt kurz nachdem das Unternehmen Laura Chambers zur Interims-CEO ernannt hatte. Die Australierin nannte als eine ihrer wichtigsten Aufgaben eigentlich die Suche nach einem neuen Chef für den Firefox-Anbieter und nicht eine Reorganisation.

        Die Änderungen deuten nach Ansicht von Techcrunch aber darauf hin, dass sich Mozilla wieder stärker auf sein Kernprodukt – den Browser Firefox – konzentrieren könnte. In der Vergangenheit brachte die Organisation zahlreiche neue Produkte heraus und vernachlässigte Firefox. Wohl auch deswegen verlor der früher sehr beliebte Browser immer mehr Marktanteile.

        Tap for Bloomberg Article

        Firefox Maker Mozilla Is Cutting 60 Jobs After Naming New CEO

        By Mark Gurman

        February 13, 2024 at 7:16 PM UTC

        Mozilla Corp., the maker of web browser Firefox, is cutting about 60 jobs as part of a shake-up under a new chief executive officer.

        Mozilla said that the move affects about 5% of its workforce and that the cuts were primarily in the product development organization. The company informed employees of the decision on Tuesday.

        “We’re scaling back investment in some product areas in order to focus on areas that we feel have the greatest chance of success,” Mozilla said in a statement. “We intend to re-prioritize resources against products like Firefox Mobile, where there’s a significant opportunity to grow and establish a better model for the industry.”

        The move comes a week after the company named Laura Chambers as its CEO. She’s a former Airbnb Inc. and eBay Inc. executive who joined Mozilla’s board three years ago. Mitchell Baker, Mozilla’s longtime chief, stepped down to become the company’s executive chairman.

        Mozilla last cut a significant number of jobs four years ago at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. The not-for-profit company, which competes with Alphabet Inc.’s Google Chrome, Apple Inc.’s Safari and Microsoft Corp.’s Edge, has been grappling with sliding market share of its Firefox web browser in recent years.

        In addition to Firefox, Mozilla’s products include email software Thunderbird and article-saving app Pocket.

        The move comes after a string of tech layoffs, with more than 32,000 jobs lost in the industry so far this year. Several major tech companies have made cuts in recent weeks, including Amazon.com Inc. and Snap Inc.

        — With assistance from Jackie Davalos

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        So this is just another part in reducing cost on section that doesn’t produce money.

        That’s what I immediately thought - they’re cutting corners to decrease dependency of googlebux, as depending on how things go those bux will go dry.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They have/had stuff for VR?

        Edit: Oh yeah. They had a VR browser but it’s a full environment one which is far less handy than simply using the android version of Firefox on the overlay screen in whatever environment I am already in.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would’ve, or rather had at the time of its creation, fully expected it to shut down either way. Because that’s kinda been the trend with most new Mozilla products from before the new CEO anyway.

  • t�m@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was actually thinking about to go through the profile directory and follow interesting people on there. I guess I should wait.

    • narrowide96lochkreis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Might be actually better to follow them now. In case these profiles move to another instance, you will still follow them after the move. But if you don’t follow them it might be harder to find out if and where they moved to, to find them again.

  • mke@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The replies are a prime example of the fediverse microblogging sphere’s greatest qualities.

    This entire event is unfortunate, but unsurprising.

      • vvvvv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Gutting defeated/ousted manager’s projects is an obligatory and unavoidable ritual in corporate environment. Competent or convenient employees are pulled into other teams, pesky/unconvenient ICs are fired since everything can be pinned on the loser. Projects are often dismantled - even profitable ones to remove any possible foothold for a comeback. Shit, now I want to write a corpo book but styled like high school biology textbook.

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would suggest not trusting anything Lunduke says, the man went off the deep end and became a harmful conspiracy theorist.

        For example, he believes there is a trans advocacy group going around and destroying open source projects from within. That’s right, only the Lunduke Journal has the truth, and the truth is that trans kids are killing open source.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Probably because nobody was using it.

      307 users over the last month is barely worth keeping the server running when mastodon.social is getting 249 thousand.

  • johnassel@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hope that means that they can and will put more power into Firefox development - to concentrate on their main thing.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    i’m legitimately sad about this since i loved having a nice wholesome social media network that actually takes moderation seriously to keep up trolls and harassers :(

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is sad, really thought they were trying to do something good but I guess they were just trying to chase trends, they’re pursuing the AI trend now heavily, and a lot of Firefox users are pissed about it, many think they are shutting down because they don’t get the positive feedback and enthusiasm about AI that they were hoping to on Mastodon, as they do on other platforms like twitter and threads.