For me “How long could I get away with driving like an ABSOLUTE ASSHOLE all the time before I lost my licence or had an accident.” Speed limits, red lights, stop signs… forget them all. Every day I have to drive sensibly and obey the law because without my licence I dont have a job, and every day I see at least one person driving like an absolute moron and I wonder…

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    All natural eugenics. No drugs or engineering, just good old fashioned artificial selection driven by fully consenting paid volunteers.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want to totally impoverish the 50 richest capitalists to see if they could “bootstrap” themselves out of it for real.

    Okay, so there’s nothing unethical or dangerous about that (they are capitalist parasites, not humans), but it would still be interesting to see.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Human genetic engineering. I’m sure governments are already doing this, because the technology is already here.

    You could create super soldiers or very intelligent people. You could then copy them in cloning vats and have an army of people you could shape and mold to your will.

    Could experiment with all sorts of stuff. For example they’ve put biiluminescent genes from certain fish into frogs to make glowing frogs. Now imagine giving humans the raw power of chimps. Or the ability to see UV light like birds. Or venomous spit. Or the power to smell like dogs.

  • BodePlotHole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d like to experiment with other non-capitalist based systems in various points of infra-structure of my country.

    I don’t think this “only make money in all things, all the time” shit is a smart way to manage numerous complex systems.

    I don’t have all the answers on how that shakes out, but I think the first move would be to only allow professionals experienced in respective fields to set up these experiments. Existing profitable systems and overseeing corporations be damned.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Genetic engineering. We have the technology at this, point. What’s getting in the way are some very dated ideas of ethics.

  • Forgot the name, but the one where they had a mock prison where half the subjects were guards with special treatment and the other half were prisoners. Though I’d be trying to figure out how to eliminate the whole “power corrupts” stuff, not just sitting back watching what happens as people die.

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s regrettable that it became part of “psychology 101” (in a general sense).

        Can you imagine how much misinformation is piggybacking off these “facts” about human nature?

  • Denjin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want to see how far you can push performance of the human body, and make the results compete against each other. All the bonkers whacky surgeries you can think of: limb lengthening, bone strengthening, replace their organs with bigger, stronger versions.

    All the drugs: hgh, steroids, any performance enhancing substance you can pump into an athlete.

    Have sports scientists raise children so that they’re born into a dedicated training regime for running or swimming.

    Then make them compete against each other in the trans-human olympics. I want to see someone do the 100m in 3 seconds, I want to see someone not have to come up for air during the freestyle, I want someone to throw a javelin 2 miles, I want bioengineered mutants doing gymnastics routines

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This sounds like something in the dystopian future where they take volunteers from “the poors” so thier families can survive if they win…

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Unit 731 was garbage science. About the only thing worthwhile that came from that was learning how better to treat hypothermia. Most of their experiments boiled down to “If we do terrible things to people, how much will they suffer?” with the answer being “A lot.”

        It doesn’t take live experiments to learn things like surgery without anesthesia is less effective, or that not treating people infected with horrible diseases causes them to die in agony.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          For sure, unit 731 was an absolute horror show for psychopaths that were left to have fun with torture ecause they labeled it science

  • konalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Raise a kid in a sensory deprivation chamber, with one exception: a monitor that only shows gen alpha brainrot videos. When they’re like 14 drop them off in a populated area and see what happens

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      Realistically would just end up a developmentally stunted invalid. There was an example from some book, I don’t remember which, where there was a SE Asian woman who lived with her family and had a baby.

      The family was ashamed, so they forced the girl to keep the baby by itself in the attic. She would go to work most of the day, and come back to take care of it when home. That was the total extent of interaction and stimulation the baby got. It ended up being severely stunted and never learned to talk.

      Essentially young children need human interaction which includes warmth and constant validation, caring for, etc

      If you interrupt that in any way, you end up with a feral child who is permanently stunted.

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They wouldn’t be able to walk at all because of floating in water for their entire life.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve broken traffic laws most of my life, and I still have a driver’s license. So, you can drive like a partially reasonable asshole indefinitely if you have the skill to pull it off.

    I’d like to see GMO humans. I want to see how far we can elevate our species using science. It’s completely unethical, but there it is.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The movie gattaca does this well. No murder or cleansing. But you can have a natural birth or IVF with the Impurities stripped out. “The best of you.”

      “Dirty” people were limited to shit like janitors and all high paying jobs would sneak a test in to filter out anyone “un-pure”

    • Delphia@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh I’m no saint. I set my cruise control at 10km/h over the speed limit, I punch it through orange lights and I sometimes roll through stop signs.

      I’m talking about full blown fast and furious wannabe swerving lanes, running reds and racing literally everywhere.

      • polarpear11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This describes my brother in law. Granted, he’s better than he used to be about 10 years ago, but he grew up in a small town, got to know all the cops pretty quickly, did a little jail time here and there but still has his license. He’s totalled many vehicles, spent some time in ICU and still drives like a bat out of hell.

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      How is that unethical? If anything i say it’s unethical to let us languish in these horrible bodies when we can work towards something better.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most people are very opposed to eugenics and genetic modification of humans. There is infinite opportunity for unexpected disasters along the way to perfection, and it’s extremely apathetic to be okay with subjecting a sentient creature to the possible ramifications of unexpected outcomes.

        • shani66@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Most people are only opposed to eugenics (as you’re using the word) because of a very narrow application. A rare few get genetic engineering and capitalism mixed up, which at least makes sense, i wouldn’t want musk choosing who gets a generic upgrade or how an augmentation is implemented.

          And i find it abhorrent that people are just fine with letting our entire species suffer the nightmare of random chance that is our bodies. Sure it’s surprisingly good for a system that only selects for whatever fucks the most, but we can and should eventually do better.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cloning is the first one that comes to mind for me. If you could somehow avoid the horrors of the process of learning a reliable methodology the result wouldn’t necessarily be unethical.

  • pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    A bit contemporary, but I’d like to have studied what it takes to break someone of illusions that were fed and forced on them externally, e.g. schooling, TV, social media and other forms of cultural imprinting and propaganda.

    We’ve all had that “what would it take to get this person to realize how far off base they are?” question, it would be fascinating, in a no-holds barred experiment testing various solutions and combinations to find out which is the most effective.

    E.g. someone believes climate change isn’t real because (x,y,z irrelevant). No amount of written evidence is effective to people who don’t understand the scientific method, so would it be videos, traveling to acutely affected places, having polar bears removed from all zoos, baseball bats on their knuckles when they make a logical fallacy?

    It would be interesting to then categorize the types of delusions or illusions and then prescribe treatment based on these results.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Parts of it could be done, but it would always stop at “the subject is uncomfortable”, which is the whole point of why changing someone’s mind against delusions, illusions and propaganda is hard. They don’t want to, so without some treatment experiments that would certainly not meet today’s medical and/or psychological standards, we wouldn’t get an answer to many questions.

        You could make a TV show sure, but all the wrong people would tune in.

        • Delphia@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You would need volunteers, but let them witness the experiments that disprove chemtrails or flat earth bullshit themselves and in person allow them to inspect the equipment and so on.

          See which ones of them are willing to actually take whats presented to them and see with their own eyes and re-evaluate their position.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Raise a child on their own without any exposure to language. Could be interesting to see how their perspective on the world develops.