When information is cheap, attention is expensive · Raphael Lullis
raphael.lullis.net

I have a number of Lemmy instances meant for discussion groups around specific topics. They are not being as used as I expected/hoped. I would like to set them up in a way that they can be owned by a consortium of different admins so that they are collectively owned. My only requirement: these instances should remain closed for registrations and used only to create communities.

    • rglullis@communick.newsOPEnglish
      4·
      1 month ago

      • Your key is your identity. If it’s lost or stolen, you can not revoke it. That alone will make it virtually impossible to be used as an official application protocol for any organization.

      • Usability is even worse than anything on ActivityPub

      • Moderation is entirely punted to the end user.

      • (not technical, but relevant) it is completely dominated by Bitcoin maxis

      • damon@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        1 month ago

        That’s not true it’s not entirely punted to the end user. It starts with the relay operators just like it does instances. All of the same moderation tools that users have on instances and with clients Nostr users have too, so I’m not really sure about that comment. Also, maybe it’s because I’m a US citizen but I don’t get what so problematic about individualism and allowing users the ability to drive their own experiences. You mention the keys that’s still under user control as if instances have not gone down with users identities, content and social graphs Usability worse than anything on AP that’s very broad. Go point for point with comparisons You can filter out any content related to Bitcoin.

        • rglullis@communick.newsOPEnglish
          1·
          1 month ago

          If you have examples of relays differentiating themselves based on moderation policies, it would be appreciated. Not just “we are extreme free speech holders” vs “we pay attention to some laws here”. What nostr relay is actually running a strict filter, or do any type of analysis on the message content beyond “payment only”?

          as if instances have not gone down with users identities.

          If instances go down, there are still lots of possible backups: someone can recover the domain name and regenerate keys (or even recover a database copy). If someone loses a private key, there is no turning back. The fact that (some) poorly managed system are not recoverable does not mean that it is as fragile as something as nostr that gives up completely on making it.

          allowing users the ability to drive their own experiences.

          The same can be achieved on ActivityPub, no new protocol is needed for that.

          Also, this is not matter of individualism, but of UX. It’s “nice” when users have the ability to make decisions on their own, but it is terrible when they have to make all decisions on their own to get started.

          • damon@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            24 days ago

            Nos.social is one, there is https://github.com/atrifat/nostr-filter-relay amongst other tools integrated into some relays.

            You said that like that’s been reality, I’m not going based on simply what’s possible but what’s happened when instances suddenly shutdown

            If the same came be achieved why hasn’t it been? It is a matter of individualism. People often see instances as communities, I don’t agree with this assessment with the exception of coop and special interest instances.