US presidential candidate Donald Trump said he would appoint Elon Musk to head a government efficiency commission if he is elected to office in November.

“At the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement… I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms,” Trump told the Economic Club of New York.

  • Bizzle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Imagine if the people in charge of our country took it seriously instead of whatever this clown show is.

    Can’t wait to vote Kamala, and least she won’t make things worse.

    • ralakus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Vote for Harris *

      Any vote not to Harris be it third party or otherwise is a vote for Trump. A third party cannot win in our current First Past the Poll system

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Then organize a ballot measure for RCV or your preferred alternate system. Too late for this November but you can do something for future elections at least at the state level.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          https://fairvoteaction.org/

          e: FairVote Action, a non-partisan group working towards election reform.

          Join to help them grow and give this issue a larger voice, and don’t wait until autumn 2027 (which is often what happens and which is too late). This needs a sustained and noisy effort so those in charge are made to start listening.

          I’ve started name checking them in threads such as this one for visibility. I’d like to see this problem addressed as soon as possible, and it ain’t fixing itself.

      • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It seriously baffles me that there are still people that don’t understood very simple and easy to understand fact. Especially when it’s been explained to them ad nauseam.

        I’m beginning to think it’s willful ignorance on their part.

        • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They’re either Trump supporters, have foreign interests, or are so fucking brainwashed they’d rather throw the whole country away than admit they don’t understand American civics

          Unfortunately as long as we have FPTP and the electoral college we aren’t a democracy

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Christ, what an absolutely terrible idea. Of course the magachuds would be stroking off to such an idea…

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve been saying for a few years now that I don’t blame anyone anymore for biting the onion. It is FAR TOO HARD to figure out what is life being absurd, and what is an absurd satire headline.

      The lines aren’t blurred anymore. There are no lines. The lines have ceased to exist at this point.

      I don’t understand life anymore, and I’d like to go back to politics being boring instead of being a circus.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        And that’s assuming the headline you’re reading even has any bearing on the actual article, or that the article itself is factual, both of which are increasingly more common worries now.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dear Donald J. Numbskull: the fact that Elon never sleeps and kisses your ass does not mean he’s efficient, or even understands the concept.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump has never cared about hiring people who are efficient. He hires them if they pay him. His administration was filled with industry representatives, who were in positions where they decided regulation of their own businesses. Corruption all the way down.

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    So, he basically bought himself a job in our government. I kinda want to say that’s illegal, but this is the circus we live in now. Complaining about the clowns is probably a waste of time at this point

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Didn’t Trump fill that roll by just not filling a huge portion of the government?

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, depending on what your goals are, that could very well be described as efficient.

      Like, if your goal is to destroy the American government, could anyone do it more efficiently than Elmo?

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are parts of the federal government that are wildly inefficient. So it isn’t entirely misguided to want to improve that. Appointing Musk to redesign the government’s operations is a terrible idea (based on Tesla operations).

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      At the federal level most of the perceived inefficiencies are really just bloated budgets to ensure funds are available when needed, like for the military. The perception of inefficiency usually comes from the public not accepting the need for redundancy or that a lot of regulatory work is time consuming and expensive.

      When conservstives talk about efficiency they mean fire people and slash budgets they oppose existing, like the NOAA. They don’t actually mean efficiency.