which works better?
If you’re trying for kanji like depictions then the first one but you have to work on your strokes. The box should be a single stroke for the top and the right line. But you gave me an idea for an art thingy in gonna create and hang in my apartment
I’d say the first looks closest to a real glyph
The last one looks closest to something I’d be arsed to scribble tho
Listen here you little shit
:3
Loss is the new triforce
That’s exactly what I was just thinking! Lemmy’s formatting doesn’t work the same way, so it doesn’t work correctly here. I think this is the best I can get it, lol.
▲ ▲ ▲
:.|:;Is this loss?
:.|:;Is this loss?
:.|:;:.|:;:.|:;:.|:;Outstanding work, I will be using this
:.|:;Holy shit
Is this loss?
:.|:;Is this loss?
Minecraft brought us
:.|:;… Who’d have thought it.:.|:;I am at a
:.|:;for words.Well, no. It wouldn’t be the first kanji of English. Kanji is the Japanese pronunciation of 漢字 (hanzi), where 漢 means han/China and 字 means character/letter. Ergo, it makes no sense to call it “the English language’s first and only Chinese character.”
If you need to use a Japanese word to describe this, then 絵文字 (e mo ji; picture, character/symbol) fits better, but we already have several words for that, like pictogram or pictograph. One could argue that smileys fall into this category as well. So perhaps it’s a smiley.
I bet you’re fun at parties
Learning random cool stuff like this is part of why I like lemmy, and why I used to like reddit. Please don’t shut down constructive contributions with low effort snark. And before you use your line on me, if I were fun at parties, I would get off lemmy and go to parties.
The etymological fallacy…
:.|:;