• WatDabney@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    There is zero chance that there is not going to be fairly significant violence from Trump’s supporters between November and January.

    It will happen, absolutely no matter what.

    Either he’s going to lose, in which case they’re going to engage in retaliatory and/or insurrectionary violence, or he’s going to win (or be handed the win by the Supreme Court Rubber-stamping Service), in which case they’re going to engage in celebratory, very enthusiastic and likely officially sanctioned violence.

    That’s it. At this point, there is no third option. Trump, in his pathological narcissism and complete lack of empathy or sound reason, has fostered an atmosphere of anger and hatred, and it’s not a question of if it will result in violence and murder, but simply of when and of what specifically will touch it off.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      or he’s going to win (or be handed the win by the Supreme Court Rubber-stamping Service),

      I agree with your comment in general and apologize for what may sound like a bit of a flippant reply, but I actually think what would worry me the most is if it it goes to SCOTUS and they somehow do NOT install Trump. I think the super-faithful deep-state-believers would lose their effing minds at that turn of events - this is where I would expect to see the violence ramping up the fastest.

      • WatDabney@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unfortunately, there’s likely some truth to that. In spite of the SC fairly consistently destroying the rule of law to rule on Trump’s behalf, if even one time they rule against him, even on just one ruling that’s so vividly obvious that the otherwise wholly corrupt and compromised SC can’t possibly cobble together an excuse to rule in Trump’s favor, that really is likely to touch off more violence quicker than just about anything else.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        No. That’s a way better option than a fascist dictator actually gaining power.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh for sure, and I wasn’t suggesting otherwise.

          I expect a more immediate and flagrant violent event in that case vs the other two though.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Biden is extraordinarily risk-averse.

        When Obama was sending the Seals after Obama, Biden was trying to talk him out of it. I mean look at the bag of cement he appointed as AG. Biden won’t say boo to a goose.

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is why I encourage every other left-wing person I meet to arm themselves, if they have the means. MAGA is already armed to the teeth, so we might as well be. We can’t just be sitting ducks.