They line up in front of a courthouse in southeastern France, from morning to evening, and have gathered in the thousands in cities across the country. They hold signs reading, “one rape every six minutes,” “not all men but always a man,” and “giving in is not consenting.”

They chant: “Rapist we see you, victim we believe you.”

Women across France are rallying in support of Gisèle Pelicot, a 72-year-old reluctant icon whose husband is on trial in the city of Avignon for systematically drugging her and inviting dozens of men, 50 of whom are now his co-defendants, into their home to rape her over nearly a decade.

The shocking case has sparked what many women in France call a long-overdue reckoning over “rape culture” and systemic sexism in the way the judicial system handles sexual violence.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The commenter probably saw the “Always a man” part of the protest sign and is daring someone to deny it.

    It’s an unfortunate sign to feature in the main article picture because it distracts from the story. There’s no issue focusing on one part of an issue (victimization of women) and not all parts (sexual abuse and rape in general). But denying the larger problem exists is counterproductive.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Pointing out language that excludes a massive number of victims isn’t rape apology.

    • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Women can be victims of women too, though. Look at how many mothers have subjected their daughters to genital mutilation, for example.

      I think it’s pretty reasonable to say, “please don’t use exclusionary language that implies some victims are more valid than others”.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s an unfortunate sign to feature in the main article picture because it distracts from the story.

      Unfortunate but not a mistake. Like anything else in media, their only goal is to sew controversy and drive clicks and “engagement”. I can’t imagine any other reason why this would be the main photo of the article. I hope and do not believe that this is the kinda sexist bullshit that represents the majority.

    • Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ll take the bait too because I’ve personally known a female abuser (never did anything to me but raped a 14 year old as a teacher) and it makes me furious that a so-called activist would not only disregard crime that doesn’t fit their narrative, but try to gaslight the rest of the world into doing it too.