JaymesRS@literature.cafe to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoJill Stein paid $100,000 to a Republican consulting firm led by a suspected January 6 rioterwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square247fedilinkarrow-up1670arrow-down129file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1641arrow-down1external-linkJill Stein paid $100,000 to a Republican consulting firm led by a suspected January 6 rioterwww.salon.comJaymesRS@literature.cafe to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square247fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-23 hours agoYou know, I completely missed that part in the wall of text, holy crap! The antisemitism roots never disappear I guess. Including trying to use it as an insult to an irish catholic (raised, atheist now). So how many mandarin oranges do you think they get per comment? My guess is two comments to one mandarin orange. Edit: I’m just gonna… make sure thats clear for anyone reading later, when their boss asks them to edit it and they got docked 1/4 of that orange.
minus-squareTachyonTele@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-23 hours agoYeah, it’s just flat out racism. I love how he throws in Antifa at the end, too lol
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 hours agoEspecially about antifa being an “organization”, considering its, you know, completely decentralized groups. So very telling, every time
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoIts decentralized. A network of autonomous groups, so not as an organization. Because it isn’t one.
minus-squareMaeve@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoI can see it either way. It wasn’t the best word choice, but to me, the meaning was clear. It just seems like nitpicking, tbh.
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·23 minutes agoThe person being replied to earlier is specifically responding in bad faith, their intent is to paint antifa as a single org.
minus-squareMaeve@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 minutes agoMaybe, maybe not. Their post history doesn’t imply to me anything other than that they feel strongly about the subject. A glance through their post history doesn’t suggest otherwise to me, but I tend to give broad leeway for lengthier time periods.
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 minutes agoConsidering the antisemitic comment, the blaming of antifa for actions where right wing instigators were found, the promotion of spoiler candidates… I’m going to have to strongly disagree with your perspective. If they felt strongly about it, they’d know more about the third parties they reference. But they dont. You can give them that leeway of course, but I’m not going to.
You know, I completely missed that part in the wall of text, holy crap!
The antisemitism roots never disappear I guess. Including trying to use it as an insult to an irish catholic (raised, atheist now).
So how many mandarin oranges do you think they get per comment? My guess is two comments to one mandarin orange.
Edit: I’m just gonna…
make sure thats clear for anyone reading later, when their boss asks them to edit it and they got docked 1/4 of that orange.
Yeah, it’s just flat out racism.
I love how he throws in Antifa at the end, too lol
Especially about antifa being an “organization”, considering its, you know, completely decentralized groups.
So very telling, every time
Blac Bloc/Antifa don’t organize?
Its decentralized. A network of autonomous groups, so not as an organization. Because it isn’t one.
I can see it either way. It wasn’t the best word choice, but to me, the meaning was clear. It just seems like nitpicking, tbh.
The person being replied to earlier is specifically responding in bad faith, their intent is to paint antifa as a single org.
Maybe, maybe not. Their post history doesn’t imply to me anything other than that they feel strongly about the subject. A glance through their post history doesn’t suggest otherwise to me, but I tend to give broad leeway for lengthier time periods.
Considering the antisemitic comment, the blaming of antifa for actions where right wing instigators were found, the promotion of spoiler candidates…
I’m going to have to strongly disagree with your perspective. If they felt strongly about it, they’d know more about the third parties they reference.
But they dont. You can give them that leeway of course, but I’m not going to.
Exactly