Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

Tim Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, has called for the electoral college system of electing US presidents to be abolished and replaced with a popular vote principle, as operates in most democracies.

His comments – to an audience of party fundraisers – chime with the sentiments of a majority of American voters but risk destabilising the campaign of Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, who has not adopted a position on the matter, despite having previously voiced similar views.

“I think all of us know, the electoral college needs to go,” Walz told donors at a gathering at the home of the California governor, Gavin Newsom. “We need a national popular vote. We need to be able to go into York, Pennsylvania, and win. We need to be in western Wisconsin and win. We need to be in Reno, Nevada, and win.”

🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • loutr@sh.itjust.works
    6·
    1 month ago

    and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of the Negroes

    Could you explain this sentence please? English isn’t my first language and I can’t make sense of it.

    • Otkaz@lemmy.world
      31·
      1 month ago

      Madison was saying that blacks in the south were enslaved and couldn’t vote. They made up a significant portion of the southern states population which put them at a disadvantage giving them poor representation.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.worldEnglish
      17·
      1 month ago

      Southern states owned a lot of slaves, and thought the slave owners should get to have the slave’s votes in addition to their own. They thought that if they couldn’t do that, the South couldn’t have a loud enough voice in the election.

      It’s kind of related to the 3/5th compromise.

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      10·
      1 month ago

      White slave owners in the south didn’t want abolitionists to vote away their supremacy over blacks, and thought the EC would be a good way to make sure the abolitionist voting bloc would be kept in check.

      • xenoclast@lemmy.world
        15·
        1 month ago

        History is riddled with the results of people on the right side giving so much to the losers that the losers win in the long run.

        They were monsters that treated humans like property… fuuuuuuuuck them so hard.

        And here we are, back again cuz someone didn’t smack them hard enough

        • Maeve@midwest.social
          3·
          1 month ago

          Now we’re all still property, but must find a way to feed, clothe, home ourselves and get to our mostly underpaid jobs. It’s fine if it’s extralegal, until we’re caught or turned in.