• chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    Because they are hypocrites, once that baby leaves the womb they give zero fucks.

    Don’t get an abortion, also we aren’t paying for that kids lunch

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    If you smoke weed you’re more likely to wear converse. It’s aesthetics. When someone says they’re anti abortion I usually see it as aesthetics. They want others to see them as being anti abortion. That’s what they get out of it.

    It isn’t a literal belief. Democrats reduce abortions, much better than cons. Being anti abortion should mean voting for Democrats… IF you were still taking things literally. It’s not misinformation or lack of education, it’s misaligned priorities.

    They’re just trying to be a tribe and signal allegiance. To have literal beliefs that you live by regardless of “your side” is a completely different game to what they’re playing.

  • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 days ago

    How come *some people who are against abortion are *also in favor of the death penalty? (Ftfy) Kind of seems like a contradicition/

    What contradiction do you speak of? Save a life, take a life. Seems logical doesn’t it?

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 days ago

    Liberals in favor of reproductive rights also tend to be against the death penalty. Is that a contradiction? Conservatives love twisting this into “they want to kill babies, not criminals.”

    Do you think they’re right about that? Or is it more nuanced of an issue? If it’s more nuanced of an issue, then it’s more nuanced in both directions.

    Liberals prioritize the woman’s ability to decide what happens with her body. They don’t like abortions, but they think they must be allowed if that’s what the woman chooses. They also recognize that it’s a medical procedure that’s absolutely necessary sometimes and other times might prevent an unwanted child from being born into bad circumstances. Meanwhile, liberals tend to be against the death penalty because our justice system is very flawed and innocent people have been put to death in the past. Perhaps a woman is allowed to decide what happens to a congregation of cells inside her body, but people shouldn’t decide the life or death of other people when imprisonment is always there as an option.

    Conservatives think in terms of essentials and things are very black and white. It’s either a baby or it isn’t. They think life comes from god so it’s his affair and not our place to countermand a new life that he’s just brought into being. Meanwhile if a grown person with a mind chooses to commit crimes, that’s on them. God makes some pretty hard judgments in the Bible so they think great we can too and that will make us like god. Conservatives also tend to believe that some people are essentially good, and others are essentially bad. And in that framework, once a person has shown themselves to be a criminal, you know they are bad so what’s the point of letting them live. Meanwhile you have no idea if a fetus in the womb will be good or bad yet.

    Please don’t downvote me for understanding both positions :)

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Because it’s not about saving the lives of unborn babies and it never has been.

    It’s about curtailing choice.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    The common thread is harm and punishment. They wish harm to those they would punish for the transgressions they make up in their heads

  • gordon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    16 days ago

    The suffering is the point. It’s got nothing to do with morals or human rights or the death penalty or abortion or “Christian values”. It’s all about making “those people” suffer.

  • CM400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Just guessing here, but I’d assume it’s because the unborn have potential and the bad guys had their chance. I don’t agree, but that’s what I assume being around some people like that…

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’m pro-choice, but mostly anti-death penalty, isn’t that a contradiction?

    I don’t really think so. A person’s bodily autonomy and the state’s power to execute citizens should not overlap.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I think it’s not necessarily a contradiction to hold your pro-choice and anti-death penalty stance, but it’s still a contradiction to hold the pro-life and pro-death penalty stance if your reasoning behind the pro-life stance is that all life is sacred.

      I agree that a person’s body autonomy and the state’s power to execute citizens should not overlap, but I still think that giving the “all life is sacred” line to justify pro-life and then being pro-death penalty “because some people deserve to die” amounts to hypocrisy.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    In the end, it’s because they’re told that that’s the way it is.

    Abortion makes a an easy political point. Vote for the children.

    Being hard on crime and executing people, That’s another easy political point. Vote for the law abiding citizens.

    They don’t care that those two things are at odds They don’t care about life or death. They care about their own exact situation, and don’t really give a rat’s ass about anyone else. They believe that the team they’re backing gives them the best advantage, and that’s absolutely all they care about. Beyond that, it’s simply consuming and regurgitating the propaganda, self-perpetuating.

    • umt@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s a pastime of liberal pundits to point out that the pro-life governor of some flyover state also supports the death penalty and so on and so forth. We get incredulous and infuriated at their blatant hypocrisy. We call them stupid, which really sets them off […] They don’t think of themselves as self-serving hypocrites or idiots who can’t keep their facts straight long enough to form a cogent argument in continuity with the rest of their ideology. We try to describe this as “cognitive dissonance” or other give other armchair diagnosis that doesn’t fully capture what’s going on. I’d like to give them more credit than that. They clearly believe in something, and in that context their words and actions would make sense, but it’s not what they’re self-advertising when you ask what they believe in.

      From still the best description of american conservative thought I’ve read: an essay by u/kin7es: https://wiki.dlma.com/belief-system-of-republicans

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        Everyone has a spot on the big food pyramid of the socio-political hierarchy. Good, smart, and hardworking people of merit make their way to the top. Bad, dumb, and lazy people go to the bottom. For convenience sake, this hierarchy is color-coded. In a zero-sum world, everyone who gets to the top has to knock someone down a rung to make room.

        I would argue this is how republican voters think. That they’re in the right because they are voting for the right of the individual. But on the other hand I think Republican policy makers give zero shits about a person’s self worth and actualization but rather they know that they need to feed the machine and we need the poor babies born to do so, and on the other hand they can demonstrate some form of moral high ground by deciding life and death.

        There’s no death penalty for defrauding elections, molding the healthcare (or really any corporate) system to work for harm and profit, avoiding taxation through infinite shell companies and offshore bank accounts. Those things are celebrated as “beating the system”

        Still to this day everyone that claims “Plandemic” is chasing some invisible elite power structure that somehow only includes democrats, without ever getting mad at the corporations that profited immensely off developing covid vaccines and charging market price for them as a portion of the world was dying.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    I obviously don’t agree with them, but my assumption is that it has to do with maturity/innocence. An unborn child hasn’t done anything wrong. They’re full of opportunity and have a whole life ahead of them. A criminal sentenced for death has I some way done something very wrong. They’ve had their chance and failed.

  • rozodru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Because it’s not about saving lives, it never has been. It’s about control.