• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Hmm so the current C can be host or device, but really I’m not focused on that aspect. I’m focused on the reversible flip it over kind of thing - like USB A you flip over because you never get it right. You could have made a USB C style that always assumed is device.

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I mean they could. But it would only solve one side. I dont think the original drafters envision using usb as a charging platform but a data transfer between thousands of different devices and host devices. I dont think they intended for most portable devices to have one side basically permanently fixed.

      For exampe for each mini and micro type B connected theres a mini and micro type A connector. But ive never seen one in the wild, but its suggestion the intention for the usb drafters.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t think we’re talking about the same thing and I don’t know where the confusion is.

        Like when MicroUSB came out, I think charging was pretty standard. The cable can be a normal USB A to USB something that is reversible like USB C style, instead of the the USB micro.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Like when MicroUSB came out, I think charging was pretty standard.

          not really, in 2007, USB wasn’t even the main way to charge phones. most manufactures were using their proprietary connectors. I recall Nokia was using their barrel plug well until they sold to MS.