• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Used for the genocide != why we supplied them. That’s the key difference the folks screaming “GEnOcIdE!” can’t grasp.

    Israel has a right to defend itself, same as any other country. Where they go off the rails is using our support offensively and not defensively, but that doesn’t mean we’re going to stop supporting them.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the key difference between unconditional military aid and conditional military aid. The weapons are being used for genocide, and we have continually sent those weapons unconditionally for over a year.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        It doesn’t matter if it’s conditional or not, the Genocide will continue as it’s not dependent on our aid. They started it in Gaza before our aid even got there.

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          It doesn’t matter if it’s conditional or not, the Genocide will continue as it’s not dependent on our aid.

          It absolutely does. We are the main provider of weapons. It would be a major pressure point for them to stop, as well as influence other western nations to do the same. It also matters according to US Law (Leahy Law) and International Humanitarian Law.

          They started it in Gaza before our aid even got there.

          We’ve been the main provider of military aid for far longer than a year.

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              30 days ago

              Ok? They also use far more than just bullets to kill Palestinian children. I don’t understand how this is an argument against implementing Conditional Military Aid. Nor against continuing to violate US and International Humanitarian Law.

              The only argument I see from that is to not only end supply of military weapons, but also intervene to stop the genocide, which I would agree with.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  30 days ago

                  They certainly have, with the military and international support by the US and other Western Nations. That’s exactly why Israel needs to be pressured by international support to stop and agree to a permanent ceasefire that includes the liberation of Palestine.

                  I don’t understand your position. Do you support conditional aid or an arms embargo? How should the US pressure Israel to stop the genocide?

                  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    30 days ago

                    My personal preference is more radical than that… full military intervention, separate the Israelis from the Palestinians, arrest Bibi and the rest of Likud and set up full war crimes tribunals.

                    But nobody has the political capital for that.