• IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yeah, both parties went down from 2020 counts. We literally had something like 18m or 20m who didn’t show up combined.

    Wild stuff. Oh well, we rode this roller-coaster once, we ride it again. Maybe this round we don’t lose 2% of our population?

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Honestly, I’m praying for another pandemic. This world is so broken that it needs a reset.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Maybe this round we don’t lose 2% of our population?

      Definitely not.

      It will be much higher than that this time.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m not seeing turnout down by 20m. Where are you seeing this data? Note, we haven’t even finished counting all the votes.

      Admittedly, I was expecting there to be overwhelmingly high turnout and there wasn’t that from what I’ve seen.

      The dude won the popular vote. I’m sure a lot of the shady bullshit that happened all around the country to suppress voting inflated his lead a little bit but I don’t think it was substantial enough to explain this.

      • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Nearly every news outlet has reported record voter turnout, but look at the vote counts from 2020 vs this year.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ll bet we never find out how many were denied the ability to vote because of registration purges, bomb threats, and other malicious voter suppression.

      But the fact that states both voted for abortion access at the state level and then also voted in all Republicans who will pass a national ban shows the voting population is stupid enough that this was the likely outcome anyway.

      Fuck this country.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I literally heard an interview with a woman who said she voted Republican because, on the one hand, abortion “isn’t that big of a deal” and ought to be left up to the states, but on the other, “doctors shouldn’t be allowed to abort babies after they’re born.”

        So this person thinks that doctors are murdering babies… and that should be allowed on a state by state basis. Which… boy oh boy, I’m not sure what to even do with a mind that works that way.

      • evidences@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think the Republican voters are to stupid or just in denial that Congress would ever vote for an abortion ban, even though they’ve clearly signaled they would. My boss is very right wing and last night he said to me that he thought it was weird all the commercials he saw for Sherrod Brown here in Ohio mentioned protecting abortion when it’s legal here. When I said a nation ban would supercede our state constitution he just straight told me Congress would pass a national ban.

    • sudo_shinespark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Nah, those are rookie numbers. Gotta pump those numbers up. And they have a whole playbook ready for it this time, so things are gonna get interesting and tragic sooner than later.

      Bonus points that if we make through, we can look forward to new exciting wars about water resources and inhospitable climate problems