• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    What am I missing here? Two sentences telling us his claims isn’t the complete failure of journalism y’all seem to be insinuating it is…

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Those two sentences would be a lot less horrible if they weren’t prefaced with “THE FACTS:”.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Its more of selectively picking what he’s said, also not including the previous versions

      “The Reagan administration implemented nearly half of the ideas included in the first edition by the end of his first year in office, while the Trump administration embraced nearly 64% of the 2016 edition’s policy solutions after one year,” the Heritage Foundation said in a press release announcing Project 2025.

      Back when Project 2025 was just getting started, Trump spoke at the Heritage Foundation’s annual leadership conference on April 21, 2022, and appeared to refer to the project, saying, “This is a great group, and they’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America. And that’s coming.”

      But Trump has since pivoted sharply against the plan. “I know nothing about Project 2025,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on July 5. “I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”

      sause So only including the part where he distanced himself from it is very sketchy.