• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    wasted too much time on starfield, FO76, and mobile games. that’s all they have released since 2018. and if you don’t count VR editions or special editions then you’re back to 2016 with FO4.

    8 years of junk. They could have made TWO elder scrolls in that time.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    Hot take: I’m fine with Bethesda taking their time to release a game if that means it’ll be higher quality. There are thousands of games released a week. Hi play something else in the meantime.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I sometimes download Skyrim again, mod it for hours and as soon as I start a new game I realise I don’t even wanna play it.

    • asmoranomar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      You might be interested to know that there are several hardcore modding scenes, where the point is to mod the game for fun. The mod guides are updated every month or so and includes thousands of mods. It takes days to install, and actually playing is optional. In most cases, a new save is required every update, so modders keep an additional playable state if they actually want to play the game.

      Lexy’s LOTD is my fav one, it’s only over a thousand mods, has very detailed instructions, and a very friendly community.

      • Jumi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        I just keeping modding games I actually wanna play like Rimworld or CP2077 but there’s really a scene for everyone and everything.

    • style99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      They’ve always sucked at making games. They weren’t always successful, though. Skyrim is the goose that laid the golden egg, and they’ll be hard-pressed to repeat that success.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    They can take as long as they want. After Starfield, I have zero confidence that TES6 will be any good. Bethesda has some serious issues they need to sort out with their production pipelines and methodology and they need to rethink how they approach story-driven open world experiences.

    Every time I see a Starfield video and see the camera turbozoom in on a character as they deliver a forced, robotic line with terrifying facial animations - I get teleported right back to 2006. It is very obvious this studio does not know what they are doing and has learned little from their previous releases and from other contemporary games.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think they really don’t believe in storytelling in the way traditional game writers do. They think enough simulation can replace good writing.

      Personally I’m certain they are wrong, and it’s tragic that they own the Elder Scrolls IP.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Simulation? What? That’s the one aspect that has been gotten worse with every Bethesda title. Their storytelling was always garbage. I never finished the main quest in Skyrim even, and the one in Oblivion was trash, the one in Morrowind barely existing. This was never the strong suit of their games.

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          Hot take, Michael Kirkbride carried TES lore. Even the interesting parts of Skyrim is based from his writing.

          • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 days ago

            Agreed. TES just hasn’t had good world design and lore since Morrowind. If I remember correctly, he also wrote much of the books in the TES universe which are still used in Skyrim.

            ESO might be an exception. I don’t think it has the best writing but it does have much more interesting lore and world design than Oblivion and Skyrim.

            • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              ESO has interesting stuff in it. Some of the basic quests in each region are written pretty well, or at least are entertaining. They need some of those writers on the ES6 team to at least have a baseline.

          • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            I mean it’s not really a hot take since it’s been the consensus among long-time TES fans since 2006. Shivering Isles is the only good lore/story contribution TES has had without Kirkbrides involvement, and even that was basically just trying to Mantle his style from Morrowind.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I should have said more, for once. I meant simulation more to describe the Bethesda house style, which seems to be this idea that having apples that can roll around on a table or whatever is immersive and engaging enough that you don’t need Michael Kirkbride hanging around putting weird metaphysical shit all over the place, actually. I wasn’t saying they were good at it, only that it appears to be what they think.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          I don’t agree that all of it has always been trash, but the quest writing mostly always has. For your Skyrim example, I went to the midnight release. I completed the main quest within a 24h period IIRC and I remember just being incredibly disappointed. I haven’t finished it again since. Honestly, Skyrim in general is a letdown besides the world they built, although they could have done a lot more to make it more interesting and feel more lived in and real instead of an amusement park.

          Their writing in the past has been really strong in world building. They’ve had really interesting lore and reasons for us to be doing what we’re doing. Most of the people who did that are gone now though, and they have been for a while, so I don’t expect it in the future.

    • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’ve said it before, and I believe that Bethesda is going to completely mess up TES6.

      There are several issues with Bethesda, the major problem being they seem to have lost all creativity and they’re trying to apply the same old formula to every single game with minimal changes. Then hope that modders will keep it on life support. And sadly that’s how I found myself having to play their games, because without many mods it was often awful to play on PC, and I still didn’t have fun thanks to repetitive content and forgettable story and characters.

      Another is that they’re clinging on to that damn dilapidated game engine of theirs like it’s their precious baby. It’s an awful engine, insanely outdated, limited and performs terribly. Starfield is a great example of how awful it is, but every game before that has had major performance issues and limitations as well.

      The only redeeming feature might be that TES6 probably won’t be a procedurally generated world. They really showed how repetitive and boring it can get with procedural generation. And a handcrafted world would have so much more character. They could perhaps use the procedural engine for dungeons, and enemies and their bases, or items found through the world, but not the world itself.

      But I’m afraid it’s just going to be a near Skyrim carbon-copy. It’ll likely be an okay looking game with an okay looking game world, but I bet gameplay will be mostly unaltered from what they’ve been doing for over 20 years. Same old basic combat, same talking heads with lifeless animations, same sneaking and magic gameplay, etc.

      • ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Agreed. They need to retire that dogshit engine and write a new one. I know that’s a huge and expensive undertaking, which is why they probably won’t. TES6 will sell like hotcakes on its name alone.

        I had been looking forward to TES6 for so damn long, but at this point the most exciting thing we can look forward to is the crazy glitches that speedrunners will discover. That is, if they’re not just the same glitches we’ve alll seen time and again.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well before Starfield came out they said they couldn’t make TES6 yet because the technology didn’t exist. Starfield’s development, I assume, was partially about building this technology. That makes me assume it’s the procedural generation or the ships. If the former, I doubt it’s the main game world or TES6 is fucked. I would suspect maybe something like plains of oblivion that are proc-gen or something.

        To me, one of the biggest things that make Starfield feel so bad is the planets are so boring, specifically because there’s too much to do (and it’s all meaningless). Every location is surrounded by the exact same amount of points of interest. There’s no barren areas and more habituated areas. It’s all this bland uniform container of “content” with nothing making any of it stand out. Proc-gen only works when it can be used to make a lot of boring empty space with a few interesting unique things to find. I don’t think they’ve figured that out yet.

        • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Well before Starfield came out they said they couldn’t make TES6 yet because the technology didn’t exist

          It’s being built on the SAME ENGINE as tes5 was built on. I think they were blowing smoke.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            Unreal Engine is old as fuck too (1995). The engine doesn’t matter if they put the work in to fix the issues. The problem is they don’t seem to be making that a priority.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          It’s all this bland uniform container of “content” with nothing making any of it stand out.

          The big irony here is that they could damn well make weights for the procgen to create spots with dense “habitation” and others with zero points of interest. But nope, just generate a map, plop down 5-8 POI, call it a day. The “big cities” like New Atlantis stand out in the worst way possible, a small square of buildings surrounded by absolutely fucking nothing. They effectively copied the worst aspects of No Man’s Sky

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Yep. It isn’t even a new thing for proc gen. That’s how it’s almost always done. You use perlin noise (usually multiple layers) to create different areas with different types of content. They just didn’t do this, except for resource patches which are the least important thing to worry about.

        • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          12 days ago

          I found it extremely funny that todd said that planets are empty and boring, because irl, planets would be boring and and empty wastelands. Why do you make a boring game then todd? Are you stupid? Is that your dream game? Imagine you can make any videogame that you want and you go: i want it to be set in the middle desert.

          Oh so there are gonna be pyramids, bandits and other points of interest?

          No the desert is pretty empty and boring.

          Oh, sounds pretty good.

          I do not understand why Bethesda fans even deal with that shit. They must laugh their asses off every time someone doesn’t refund starfield.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            Honestly, I mostly agree they should be mostly empty and boring. They aren’t though. They’re absolutely full (of really boring stuff). There are no empty spaces. If there were then finding something would feel special. However, anywhere you land it shows you at least like ten points of interest nearby. I don’t think there’s anywhere on any planet that isn’t inhabited despite supposedly no one colonizing most of the planets. Every location is generic, so none of its unique and you never find anything special.

            Excitement and fun is built on the juxtaposition of the opposite. If everything is equally interesting, nothing is interesting. For example, in some space games finding life on other planets is exciting, because it’s rare. In other games there’s life on nearly every planet and it’s boring because it’s not different than anywhere else. To use loot drops as an example, if every drop was a legendary, legendary drop would be boring. You need most drops to be bland common items so the legendary drop stands out.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      ES6 will be fine. Starfield was doomed from the beginning because of the silly space exploration structure.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        Not if they keep on their BS. Let’s look at Fallout 4. The engine is absolutely the weakest part of the game. Can’t even keep 60fps in the city on any settings or on consoles. Frame times are all over the place. And the game isn’t even that pretty, it’s very ugly and textures are real bad. The story was pretty awful and boring, the writing in every way was forgettable.

        So that’s why ES6 is screwed. It’s been downhill since Skyrim and even releasing a better looking Skyrim in 2028 on the PS6 isn’t going to cut it. It’ll be the most expensive budget title out there.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Bethesda has some serious issues they need to sort out with their production pipelines

      That’s a strange way to spell “Todd Howard” /s

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It is very obvious this studio does not know what they are doing and has learned little from their previous releases and from other contemporary games.

      I think they’ve learned that they don’t have to care about that to be successful. We have to keep reminding ourselves that success by these studios does not have to be defined by ‘making a good game’. Starfield was a great success financially and there’s no reason they should change gears from that perspective.

      Starfield has made around $700 million.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I just want more Skyrim dlc at this point. I have lost faith in their ability to make new games

      • BurnSquirrel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Why not? are you expecting a fully game on release? When have they ever put out something that wasn’t fixed by modders?

        Better yet, I’d like to see them put out more of a platform than a game with maybe a built in missions they can call “Cannon”, sort of like the ARMA series does. Let the people build it, they have been anyway.

        • ddplf@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Are you telling me that it is excusable for a company engaging over 400 people over many many years in a production of a videogame to not playtest their game and make players pay for testing it?

          Dude, Early Access is okay if you are an indie games company with limited resources, NOT an AAA producer with infinite budget.

  • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Join the dark side – stop taking your pills and enjoy Elder Scrolls 6 and Titanfall 3 with the rest of us

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    Tbh I kinda hope Bethesda doesn’t make a new Fallout game, I predict if they do make a new one it’ll make Fallout 76 look like New Vegas in comparison.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    There was a whole era of gaming from the late 90s to like 2010 where like a couple developers made something special, left, and then the company coasted on the code for a decade.

    For me it was the Company of Heroes series.

        • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          But it holds up thanks to the mods that are available for it now. Mods which are all developed by not-Bethesda. Vanilla Skyrim doesn’t hold up in 2024, modded Skyrim does.

          • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            really? hmm weird, because 95% of my playthroughs are unmodded, and i still play it regularly. i would be extremely shocked if im the only one in the world not using mods

            and hell, before mods were on consoles there were STILL plenty of people playing it

            • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Skyrim is a classic game, and there are always going to people playing it, like there will always be people playing Half Life 2, Mario and Tetris. But I think what makes Skyrim stand out is that it’s still exciting a decade later because it’s still changing and improving. Amazing groups of people are dragging that game into every new generation and changing it in every way imaginable. It has infinite replay value. So it has the draw of just being a great vanilla game but also the benefit of mods. It’s safe to say it wouldn’t be anywhere near as popular today without the huge library of mods.

              • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                i disagree with the last point. mods definitely helped, but skyrim was a complete cultural phenomenon even to people who had no idea what mods even were. it was extremely highly praised and sold great on consoles. i think it would have been a classic regardless

                • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  I agree it would have been a classic without the mods. What I’m saying is it’s better than a lot of other classics, as a gaming experience, because of the mods.

      • Rider@eviltoast.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 days ago

        True, but Bethesda not only embraced modders with open arms—they encouraged them! You can’t say the same for most other game devs; the majority either ignore modders like they’re pests or, worse, are outright hostile towards them.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Well except for that part where the native mod tools suck ass and every creation club update breaks a bunch of mods

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Their “open arms” has felt like a vampiric embrace for almost a decade now, because they would really, really, really prefer if modders released stuff via their club, where modders can get money and they also get a slice for free.

          The bigger PC names of the 90s and early 2000s were all welcoming to modding, with some games shipping with the “official editor tools” for anyone to mess around with (UT99 and Warcraft 3 come to mind)

      • lukhan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        skyrim is ever lasting, if there is no skyrim is heaven then it isn’t heaven