• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    If “history told you wealth redistribution doesn’t work”, then that doesn’t make sense. It can’t show you it doesn’t work by not happening, that’s more like showing you it isn’t achievable, at best.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I guess there’s two distinct possible interpretations of the OP statement: that you can’t do it, or that the results would be bad. For some reason it makes more sense in my head that the standard propaganda would be more about the results being bad, or the idea of even trying being just unthinkable.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          the standard propaganda

          That’s your problem. You’re trying to interpret earnest statements through the lens of propaganda. Not that I can’t understand taking such a view of social media.

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well I mean, what defines the meaning of “Redistribution of wealth doesn’t work” in the context of this meme is explicitly the intent of an imagined propagandist. A defining feature of mainstream political discourse is to refuse the problem of wealth distribution as a topic of consideration at all, it’s redirected to some narrower conception of the problem or made about values. I think what you are saying is not quite the same as a defense of the statement as delivered.

            But anyway it’s still wrong; even if bureaucratic mechanisms of wealth redistribution were unavoidably self defeating, it is not the case historically that wealth redistribution doesn’t happen, it just tends to happen via traumatic collapse.