OK, so I finished this a while back, and despite it appealing to a lot of my interests, I honestly found it pretty meh.

I really enjoyed the realistic military/tactical aspect of it all, as that part is right up my alley, but… I did not care about the characters, the plot seemed hollow, and it seems like some things that could have been explored further were simply ignored.

For example, in the beginning these guys blow up a refinery. There are vague descriptions as to why, but after this it is practically not mentioned again. Whatever movement they were part of apparently disappears, and there are no repercussions for their home oblast.

The only thing this book has going for it, in my opinion, is that military nerds like me enjoy the detailed writing about the different types of hardware involved in the book.

So, since I am by no means a literary connoseur, I’m curious about what others think of this one.

  • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not a great classical literature, for sure. The characters are almost entirely flat and forgettable, and even the handful that do grow (the young Soviet commander, the US destroyer captain) barely do so. Their experiences never almost never inform their later actions.

    But among the techno-thriller/war-simulator genre, I found it more compelling than several more recent attempts (Ghost Fleet, Nuclear War: A Scenario, etc). Many of those seem to go out of their way to bend the plot to produce the author’s intended point, and while RSR wasn’t exactly innocent in that regard, I found it far less guilty than others - largely because Clancy was holding to the known or theorized-near-future capabilities.

    Where I actually find it fascinating is how, in retrospect, we can see the biases of the era influencing how Clancy makes certain predictions:

    • The Soviets place immense importance on taking Iceland to permit a “second Battle of the Atlantic” against US carrier groups. In retrospect, we know the Soviet Navy had no interest in this and intended to act as a cordon around northern Europe; specifically the Soviet SSBN bastions.

    • While Clancy did loosely predict the nature, role, and value of Stealth aircraft, the design and air-to-air role he describes them in is actually too advanced for the 1980s setting. Essentially, Clancy bought the rumors, which were wrong.

    • Land attack helicopters with ATGMs play relatively little role in the ground fighting. This was because the current generation (namely the AH-64) had just been introduced; their full capabilities and impact were not yet publicly available.

    These mistakes, although understandable, provide an interesting insight into what the American defense establishment was thinking about in the early 80s.

  • raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I read it in my 20s and liked it well enough. It isn’t great literature but it was a fun read.

    I read it again in the last few years, I’m now in my fifties, and I had to skip the Iceland parts with the Air Force Lieutenant and the woman. My god, Clancy must have been an insufferable misogynist.

    Someone should rewrite the book and remove or change that part.

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think it was mostly meant as military nerd porn.

    Like, the guys who blow up the refinery are only important in asmuch as they create the need for a conflict with the West. Some oppressed group pulls off something wild but doesn’t have the men/material to do anything major afterwards (which is how a lot of terrorism goes.)

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I read it a long time ago and enjoyed it. Read it again last year and was kind of disappointed. The ending is so incredibly blunt.

  • ExtraMedicated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    I once chose to read a Tom Clancy book over the summer for a book report in the following semester (I enjoyed those Rainbow Six games from the 90’s, so the books would probably be cool too right?). I stood up there in class and was like “I’m gonna be honest, I couldn’t bring myself to read more than half of this.” And the teacher was like, “I don’t blame you.”

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I gave up on Rainbow Six as well. I didn’t really understand the plot.

      Apparently I was meant to be on the side of Team America: World Police and not sympathise with the environmentalists trying to save the world from corruption and climate change.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good is relative. Finnegan’s Wake is a masterpiece, and it’s also deliberately obscure to the point you either need an education matching Joyce’s or a reading companion.

    Is that good?

    Is it bad if it is not approachable? Is it good if it is?

    Red Storm Rising is one of the best modern military fictions according to a lot of fans of the genre, but that’s doesn’t mean you have to like it. I’ve got some straight up gunporn series I read when I’m in a mood for reading about automatic shotguns firing explosive shells into vampires, but I wouldn’t call them good at anything but that and objectifying women.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t say I remember that one particularly well, I just remember I didn’t much enjoy it. Tom Clancy has a few books that are pretty fun to read and even more books that are just blah at best.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Instead of reading Clancy read Matthew Reilly. I suggest you start with Ice Station. It’s got everything you need, French Baddies, Spaceships, Hovercraft, and even killer Killer whales!

  • boatswain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, it’s Tom Clancy. It’s a fun read, like Dan Brown or Brandon Sanderson, but it’s not literature or anything.

  • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Relax: Calm down, chill bro.

    you’ll be pleased to know yours is a very reasonable opinion to have and you’re right for having it, too.

  • mlfh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    The thing I remember most about this book is the heroic American Mary Sue rescuing an Icelandic damsel in distress from a traumatic sexual assault by Soviet soldiers, and then immediately afterwards she falls in love with him and they have sex in a hot spring or something. Standard conservative male military-nerd wish-fulfillment pulp fantasy written by a guy whose main protagonists are all thinly-veiled self-insertions.

    That said, as a fellow nerd, I love it when Clancy tells me all the little details about a submarine, and it’s a fun read. But I wouldn’t call it good.

  • showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    My second favourite crazy conspiracy theory is that Tom Clancy didn’t really exist and that he was the front man for the CIA’s public relations office. Red Storm especially leads this as the whole novel reads like someone took a high level war game and tried to make a novelisation out of it.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m pretty sure I remember reading that Clancy and a buddy essentially wargamed the conflict and wrote out the results.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I suppose I could’ve just checked wikipedia, I was sort of right but also sort of wrong:

          Development Tom Clancy met Larry Bond in 1982. The two discussed Convoy-84, a wargame Bond had been working on at the time that featured a new Battle of the North Atlantic. The idea became the basis for Red Storm Rising. “We plotted out the book together, then, while I researched the military issues, Tom wrote the book,” Bond said.[5] “I’m listed as co-author, but I wrote like 1 percent of the book,” Bond stated in a 2013 interview.[6] For research on the Politburo scenes, Clancy and Bond interviewed Soviet defector Arkady Shevchenko.[7]

          Clancy had purchased Bond’s wargame Harpoon as a primary source for his future novel The Hunt for Red October (1984).[8] Clancy and Bond used the board game’s second edition miniature rules to test key battle sequences, notably the Soviet operation to seize Iceland and the attack on the carrier battle group in the “Dance of the Vampires” chapter.

          Dance of the Vampires This refers to the chapter where the Soviets lure a NATO carrier group into a trap and almost manages to wipe it out.[9]

          The game sessions typically involved several players on each side (Clancy among them) acting in various roles.[10] with Bond refereeing. The games did not influence the outcome - the chapter’s ending was already decided - but they gave Clancy and Bond a “better understanding of what factors drove each side’s thinking”.[11][12]

          This attention to detail made Vice consider Red Storm Rising a “great example of fictional military history.”[9]

          The collected and annotated notes on the three Dance of the Vampires scenario playthroughs would later be published by Bond.[11][13]

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I couldn’t finish it because it was both so over the top American (I’m not American so it feels different) but also because at times it was weirdly boring.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t think it is generally considered a good book, but I’m sure it depends on who you ask. I thought it had some interesting ideas, but was pretty weak overall.

  • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, lol no it isn’t, the whole submarine plot has been forced into it because Clancy can’t not write about submarines.