• vaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I thought this was a mini-pc to compete with the mac mini, until I realized its streaming only. I’d much rather cough up the extra $250 for the insane jump in power that the mac mini gives you.

  • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This feels way too expensive for what is a dumbed down device. Maybe $50-$100, but you would still end up paying quite a bit for something that requires a subscription.

    For the price they are asking, you could get a desktop with OK performance that will be free forever after that.

  • richardisaguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    i think this is the most stupid product i have ever heard of. I can’t help but imagine the unholy latency of transferring files from “your computer” to an external storage.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Almost every cloud based device I’ve ever owned ended up either putting an increasing number of basic features that were originally free behind a subscription paywall or simply turned itself into a brick when it stopped being supported.

    • simonced@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yep, that sound worth than Recall.
      People are buying that shit?! LOLOLOLOL

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    No one here is talking about the subscription that will come with it…

    If it streams from someone’s else computer,you will have to pay for that “service”…

    Why pay Windows once when you can pay it every month!

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    No thanks. I do want the large wifi enabled suppository that probably comes with it 😉. I can use that in times of loneliness and despair.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    But for that you can buy a mini PC that runs it locally. What the fuck is this even for?

  • mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Imagine spending 350 bucks on a device that turns into useless e-waste the second M$ changes their business strategy

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Link device is designed to be a compact, fanless, and easy-to-use cloud PC for your local monitors and peripherals. It’s meant to be the ideal companion to Microsoft’s Windows 365 service, which lets businesses transition employees over to virtual machines that exist in the cloud and can be streamed securely to multiple devices.

      It sounds like it’s part of a broader strategy to have companies outsource their IT to Microsoft.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah but it’s priced the same as a cheap laptop and/or desktop, which of course doesn’t then require you to pay monthly to actually use the stupid thing.

        It feels like another ‘Microsoft asked Microsoft what Microsoft management would buy, and came up with this’ product, and less one that actually has a substantial market, especially when you’re trying to sell a $350 box that costs you $x a month to actually use as a ‘business solution’.

        This would probably be a cool product at $0 with-a-required-contract-with-Azure, but at $350… meh, I suspect it’s a hard sale given the VDI stuff on Azure isn’t cheap.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          which of course doesn’t then require you to pay monthly to actually use the stupid thing.

          I think the idea here is that the businesses can lay off some of their in-house IT staff and pay Microsoft a lesser amount instead; the in-house IT staff does get paid monthly.