• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 hours ago

    So does he now want people working from home or not?

    He’s very inconsistent.

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Oh, don’t mistake. They’ll still have to go into an office, they’ll just be driving the cars remotely, most likely.

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The self-driving taxis and humanoid robots companies like Tesla are developing are just a thinly disguised way of getting around immigration law. We’re a very long way away from having autonomous humanoid robots that can clean your house for you. But one remotely piloted by someone in Bangladesh wearing a haptic suit? If the tech was cheap enough, that sort of thing would be profitable.

    It’s effectively an extremely perverse and exploitive form of immigration. When we bring immigrants in, they typically take low-level jobs. But they also get opportunities to advance themselves further. Moreover, in the US at least, any children immigrants have on US soil automatically become US citizens. So yes, immigrants come in on the bottom of the social ladder, but they have an opportunity to climb.

    Here though? This is a way of getting all the labor we want from immigrants but without offering them the usual deal in return. And even worse, they won’t even be owed minimum wage.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not only that, there is now a middleman involved so the citizens still get screwed instead of being able to access cheap labour directly.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    On the one hand, this means they may be serious about actually trying to make this work. On the other hand, it’ll almost certainly require a subscription to use the robotaxi in fully autonomous mode because that’ll be an ongoing liability for Tesla.

  • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Waymo is doing the same. Mostly self-driving but when they get stuck a human at a help center takes the sticks. There are a lot of edge cases in the real world so it makes sense to just have the car programmed to be very conservative and let a human deal with it.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Just subreptitiously sell it as a video game, you won’t even have to pay the drivers. I don’t see what could go wrong with this plan.

  • lipilee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    scammers pull the same shit over the world since the mechanical turk. at this point the joke’s on us.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Basically what the self driving food delivery robots do in Berkeley, then

    They are pretty autonomous, but if they get stuck then someone in Colombia takes control

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Yarp. This all being sensationalized before we see the actual product and see how it is being implemented. They aren’t remotely driving cars at 50mph down a highway, they are going to remotely tell the car to pull over when someone puts a cone on the hood at a stop light as a prank, or if it gets stuck where it believe it may hit something in every direction, where it is stopped and someone will evaluate the risk via the cameras and guide the car in the best direction. So likely you need 1 person for a very large number of cars.

  • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    how many owners has the onion had now like all better known sites that were magazines they are all just skin suits that only use the name Recognition and nothing more.

    i do love a car with no steering wheel what could go wrong.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I know. The Onion used to be such a great news source. What a shame they’ve fallen in to this fake news trap.

      • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        its almost like this whole sub is based off something that is shit and lame now like its supposed to be funny or something. so becoming a parody of itself.

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          23 hours ago

          How is that relevant to the thread? This sub is “not the onion”. It means news that sounds made up. Why do you start talking about the Onion itself? Or do you not understand the sub?

        • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I feel like onions in general have lost a lot of flavor. I think it has to do with farming conditions and big agriculture businesses trying to eek out more profit. I should probably just start growing my own.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          To be fair, it’s really hard to tell what you were saying. It took a few re-reads to parse your comment into something that makes sense.

          • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            its simple the onion is shit now and they are owned by totally different people now so basing something of the onion does not mean the same thing anymore.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Sentences, man. Run-on sentences make people’s heads hurt. I eventually got your message, but without reasonable punctuation, most readers just see a jumble of loosely-connected words.

              • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                maybe im not a grammar Nazi for random comments on the internet. i do not give a fuck about your punctuation i have been on the internet long enough to know nobody gives a fuck about punctuation. i do not even want to talk about punctuation its stupid. maybe get better.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s expensive bro. Just get a poor person to do it for next to nothing.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “How was your day, honey ?”

    “I killed thirty people in a pile-up on Hwy74 remotely. I’ll be a little late.”

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    is planning to hire a human team to remotely troubleshoot its robotaxi operations.

    Ok so they’re not remotely driving, as the title would have you believe.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Hey more jobs for taxi drivers and safer to do from the comfort of your home. Just like a drone pilot!

    Who would have thought that Taxi drivers one day would be able to work from home?

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, it’s not. Many companies are doing this monitoring at 10:1 ratios. It hurts my brain that so many people don’t understand what a massive industry changing number that is. Even at early maturity these systems can reduce workforce by 90%.

    • VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lots of taxi drivers are already reckless. Imagine if they can drive remotely!

    • pezhore@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Nah, they’ll still have to come into the office 3-4 days a week for “collaboration” and “cross-team building”. But they can do their drone whatsyhootzit from their cramped cubicles!