• BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Delete this, YouTube will catch on and block this workaround.

      Edit: disregard. Here is a custom GreaseMonkey/ViolentMonkey userscript to automatically do this for you:

      // ==UserScript==
      // @name         YouTube to Embed Redirect (Desktop & Mobile)
      // @namespace    http://tampermonkey.net/
      // @version      1.1
      // @description  Redirects YouTube video URLs (desktop and mobile) to their embed version.
      // @author       BaroqueInMind
      // @match        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v*
      // @match        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v*
      // @grant        none
      // ==/UserScript==
      
      (function() {
          'use strict';
      
          // Extract the video ID from the URL
          const videoId = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get('v');
      
          if (videoId) {
              // Redirect to the embed URL
              window.location.href = `https://www.youtube.com/embed/$%7BvideoId%7D`;
          }
      })();
      
      
    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No one understands the astronomical bandwidth, CPU/GPU intensive calcs, and data storage necessities required to do anything close to what YouTube currently does.

      There is no way under this warm sun that a fediverse version of YouTube will ever be feasible, unless someone like literally yourself is willing to pay extraordinary high amounts of money for all the required infrastructure and daily maintenance to run it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        What part of “bittorrent” do you not understand? I am really getting fucking sick and tired of people like you posting this bullshit FUD.

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          PeerTube uses WebTorrent protocol and it still doesn’t do well with the same quantity of bandwidth demands.

          Post your own self-hosted PeerTube instance for us all to use then, let’s see who’s correct. Otherwise provide a solution or shut the fuck up.

      • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Monetization. Tumbleweed content-wise. Some content producers make content for money.

        Media reach: Content is stored, where the consumers look for it.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        A “fediverse” version of Youtube already got made and subsequently killed, PopcornTime.

        The Bittorrent backbone already has plenty of media and can handle more bandwidth than we’d ever need to throw at it. Encrypted Onion Routing provides a degree of insurance against copyright cops, too. The only problems left to solve are automating the discovery of user-relevant content and avoiding the legal system long enough to write and popularize an open source app that puts it all together with a couch-friendly front-end.

      • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        At this point, I wonder how we can solve google’s youtube monopoly. Is it even doable? So overwhelming.

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Simplest solution is to kill Google CEOs, anything else proposed as a solution will take longer than your entire lifetime.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would want to see some data on costs, because I think you might be overselling the difficulty and cost a bit (I don’t actually know, just my good faith belief). Imagine if every content creator ran their own instance. Instead of needing to worry about every user coming to a single group of servers, the Creator only needs to worry about the cost of hosting their own content and the traffic they get.

        With the number of YouTubers who have to get sponsorships and Patreon anyway, it doesn’t really seem that infeasible or unreasonable to expect content creators to run their own thing or pay to have someone else to do it. Doesn’t seem like the YouTube money is that lucrative, anymore, so not like it would be all that different, either.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Several tried. Nothing as elaborate as cross dissemination, federation or whatever. But at least 5 to 10 years ago it proved to be almost impossible. Platforms like Rooster teeth, which was 100% subscription based, I think never broke even and still relied on YT ads for the majority of the revenue. Some big and small channels tried to at least just catalog, archive and serve their own videos and the costs still became astronomical really fast. Whenever you see one of those very old channels, most of them don’t conserve copies, let alone original source footage of their entire material. Everyone just delete their videos once they’ve been on YouTube for a month or so now, and they have to download their own videos when they want to reuse old footage.

          Storage is cheap today, yes, but video really eats storage at an alarming rate. Specially now that 4k is the standard. So you have to reuse storage over and over. Transcoding is also really fast and optimized with modern algorithms, but it takes specialized graphical cards and data centers charge a premium to use servers with such capacities. Self hosting will never be able to satisfy a moderate demand. Get anything above 100 users simultaneously transcoding videos and a non-specialized server will halt to a grind just on IO calls to hard drives alone.

          Once you consider all those factors it is obvious why YouTube is such a miracle.

          • cobysev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            According to that first link, it costs $6.1 billion to $11.7 billion annually to run YouTube. Even if you segment that into niche video communities, it’ll still cost hundreds of millions of dollars annually to host it, if you get a decent amount of traffic.

            This is why YouTube is a monopoly. Because they have the ridiculous amount of money to throw at a “free” video hosting site. Any other video host would crumble under the weight of YouTube’s level of traffic. That’s also why some others, like Nebula, require a subscription model to function. Or any movie/TV show streaming service. They can’t afford to host that stuff for free.

            This is also why Google is so obsessed with cracking down on anti-ad software. That’s how they make the money that pays for YouTube.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              According to this, as of Jan 2024 there were 14 Billion videos on Yt. So effectively a dollar and change to host a video for all YT users.

              Obviously it doesn’t work like that, but if the above commenter’s point was that I, a content creator, host my video and manage my own costs, and that video is linked via whatever federation, I can monetize and limit as needed as a creator, thus popular videos get paid to host, and unpopular videos are hosted for more or less table stakes because they’re only getting X hits per Month.

              Some kind of WordPress-like container with a built-in safety switch for overages and - hey presto. Well, it’s a thought anyway.

              I dunno, it seems do-able, even if the Great Unwashed are going to stick with YT and getting ads up the wazoo to see “I Stuffed My Face In A Fusion Reactor - Watch What Happens Next” and the like.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Sure, but you’re assuming all content is on one server. With something like PeerTube, content is federated.

            That said, I don’t think federation is the solution here because a popular video is going to completely swamp that instance, but something P2P would probably work if you can stream from multiple seeders. Even if you copy like we do w/ Lemmy, you’d still end up with a handful of instances that are way more popular than the rest and those would get hammered if there’s a particularly popular video.

            If you can spread that $6B (ignoring bandwidth here) over 10M people, you end up with a very reasonable $600/year, and costs would go down as more people join the network. I also assume a lot of that is duplication to handle demand spikes, which is baked in to the P2P system, so a P2P system would probably be way cheaper to scale up.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              but something P2P would probably work if you can stream from multiple seeders

              Which is, in fact, exactly how PeerTube works: it’s got BitTorrent built right into it.

              Frankly, it’s ridiculous how people keep harping on this “problem” as if it isn’t long since solved.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I thought it was largely federated? I don’t know how the internals work, so I don’t know what group of peers it’ll pull from.

                Regardless, the problem PeerTube has little to do with its technical foundation IMO, but the network effect. If we get people to start using it, either we’ll fix it or we’ll develop something better, but getting creators to move is the first step.

            • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              If you read the links, this includes their server clusters and employees across the entire world all doing complex load balancing and maintenance.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Sure, and none of that is necessary with a proper P2P system. If I’m torrenting something, it’ll naturally pull from seeders near me over seeders on the other side of the planet, so load balancing happens by every client being greedy.

                The complex load balancing is only necessary because it’s a centralized service.

                • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  This protocol already exists and so does the system, PeerTube.

                  Why no significant quantity of people use it is apparent after you try it for a while; the entire server system cannot handle the commensurate volume of content and interactions that YouTube is popular for.

    • bishbosh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Peertube, but it’s really not nearly the replacement lemmy or mastodon are.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yet. It’s still very new, and as enshittification increases, so will federated development.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Reddit is mostly text, with a few images for memes, very low in storage, processing power, or bandwidth, its easy to have a fediverse replacement.

      Youtube is a video platform. Video take a lot of storage, encoding/decoding, bandwidth…

      And video platforms are small amount of content creators, with 99 percent of the users being non-content-creating viewers. Once the content creators are on a monopoly platform (like youtube), there’s no incentive for them to leave. And fediverse wouldn’t have the same money to make.

      In contrast, anyone can find interesting links to post to a Reddit-alternative, anyone can make memes.

      TLDR: Reddit is community-focused. Youtube is creator-focused. Difference in hardware requirements. Theres no practical alternative for Youtube, especially not a fediverse one.

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I love that the replies to you are half saying that it’s an impossible problem, and half linking to existing solutions.

  • Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good joke, YouTube.

    Ah yes, but what about the violation to our time where we’ve had to sit through 30 second ~ 2 minute ads of over-dramatized ways for shitty companies to get us to buy shit we don’t want and subscribe to services we don’t need? What about those violations and those violations happen more frequently than us blocking your ads? The hell with you.

            • Engywuck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Well, sometimes you have to make choices: videos+ ads or nothing. Vote with your wallet, if you are to do so.

                • Engywuck@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  That’s fine, if they’re able to do so. That’s why I wrote “sometimes”. I frankly fail to understand people’s addiction to YT. What’s more, Id really like all those crap YT, Twitch and the likes to disappear for good and go back to “written” internet. In this shitty era, a lot of useful info is actually buried in a crap load of self promotion and blabbering on those platforms (which I refuse to use).

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Who cares. These of people are YouTube addicts. Just stop using it, if you find it so unbearable.

          • viking@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Oh I totally agree with you, I was just making fun of the downvotes coming from hypocrites who don’t want to abandon their favorite megacorp but instead cry a river about ads.

            Now I hate ads like the next guy, but either I find a way to block them, or I move on.

            • Engywuck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Same here. These people are literally unable to vote with their wallet, not even metaphorically.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, then don’t go on YouTube, or use peer tube. You are trading 30 seconds of your time for:

      • creators making the thing you so desperately want to watch
      • disk space to store it
      • bandwidth to send it around the world
      • compute to transcode it and process it
      • real estate and security for the premises
      • power for the datacenter
      • ac to cool the servers
      • wages of workers to maintain that whole infrastructure
      • wages of devs for the app
      • yes, profits for the company

      Of course, you can decide to not pay and steal it instead, just don’t act like you are morally entitled to do it.

    • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m just so tired of ads nowadays, ads for cars i can’t afford, ads for crap i’m never going to buy, ads for the supermarket i’m going to no matter if they have some discount…it’s all useless and a waste of my time and invasion on my peace.

      I bought the devices, i pay for the internet connection and i pay the rent on this house, i decide what makes it inside my house.

      I don’t need this funny clip my supermarket made to market overpriced holiday food 46 times a day that lasts 60 seconds and is only funny the first time i see it. I’m not going to buy a tiny christmas cake that barely feeds a child for €15, realistically it’s value to me is €1,50 compared to my wage and amount of food i get in return. I’m buying store brand m&m’s and a loaf of bread like i do all year.

      If you can’t keep existing without shoveling truckloads of ads into my face, then go bankrupt…i don’t give a damn. You’re not worth €16 a month to me either or whatever the price is nowadays. Just fuck off i’ll get my entertainment elsewhere, heck i might dust off that ps4 and buy used dvd’s for 25 cents a piece.

      • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah and a couple of things:

        Malware has directly passed through as networks multiple times and neither the server of ads nor the ad network were able to be held responsible for it.

        Right now it is common for ads to show apps that look like something popular but deploy malware. Nobody is taking responsibility for any of it. Ad networks aren’t well policed.

        It is irresponsible for a user not to block ads IMO but I also get to decide what packets of data traverse my network just like any other person or company. As a consumer I do not have to be responsible or care if a business model succeeds or not.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    i use ublock origin

    reddit still good for something: Filter Lists–>uBlock filters–>uncheck the “ublock filters - quickfixes” box and then reload the page.

    this worked for me

    • Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Awesome.

      The day FireFox and UBlock Origin stop working with eachother completely. Might be the day I just uninstall all of my browsers and use my PC more personally than before.

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only one of my three computers was having this problem, but this solution worked for me as well. Thanks for sharing it here!

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        They do random testing. I’ve received one of these a couple of times with unlock as well. Google/yt has not fully committed.

          • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sometimes I have to use YouTube rawdog for work and it’s unusable, if I want to skip forward in the video to reach the solution to my problem I get an add every time I click the timeline.

              • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I don’t speak for the person you are asking, but for me the reason is that google is evil, and huge. They don’t need my money, and I wouldn’t pay them for any reason.

                I expect that if the workplace officially needed to use YouTube, then that workplace would be paying for that subscription. But if its just that sometimes someone wants to include video from YouTube in a presentation or something - then probably not.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  The way they worded it, it sounded like dealing with YouTube was their job, like maybe managing a company’s YT account. So yeah, I totally expect a company to pay for YT premium. I’m certainly not suggesting they do it, unless they’re a freelancer or something.

          • mesamune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah you and a lot of people. There’s a couple articles about it but essentially there’s some talk of pushback.

            And personally for me there are alternatives that people could use. While not a lot of people are on it, peertube is a viable alternative. I’ve watched a couple of small creators on it and it ha good performance. Just a very small audience.

            Makertube is one of my favorites.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I didn’t screencap it but today on YT I was given a modal that said I was using an adblocker (ublock) and I have three more videos before they require premium. I changed VPN locations and stopped getting the message.

    • Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I find the adblock yt prompt only shows now when I try to open two tabs of YouTube. Second tab has this message but the first plays fine. I think ublock probably deployed a half fix already

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Fuck reddit, this solution did not work for me. All YouTube videos stop buffering after 59 seconds. Only fixes i have found is with either making a custom userscript or disabling ublock from working on YouTube by whitelisting the entire domain.

  • bizarroland@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s a very simple solution to this, and I’m honestly not quite sure why no one is doing it.

    Make ads voluntary. Make them separate from the rest of the experience.

    Make it so that you can watch ads and answer surveys based off of the ads in order to get credits which then allow you to watch videos.

    Alternatively, make it so that you can purchase the credits out right.

    Everyone fucking wins.

    I don’t know why people are so stupid as to not even contemplate the easiest and most satisfying solution to all of the problems.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      But the venn diagram of the group of people who take voluntary surveys and the group you want to advertise to have no overlap.

      The problem with ads is that we’re barely removed from the era of all ads being malicious trojans if you clicked one. All ads are still malicious, just less insidious. They’ll silo you off into an echo chamber rather than brick your computer. Some will still brick your computer though.

      I block ads because I don’t want to see ads, but I don’t want to see ads because I don’t trust any of them. Until they fix that, they’ll stay blocked. I don’t care if you’re Google or some boutique website, I’ll block them all.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Your last suggestion is basically what YouTube premium offers. I don’t think I would personally watch ads voluntarily, but I’ve seen similar systems in some games. Smite (at least used to) let you watch ads to get gems that you can use to buy cosmetics.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well I guess I’ll be mozying over to Rumble now.

    20 minutes later

    Turns out Jews are aliens directing the Democratic Party and Hollywood to sacrifice babies for adrenochrome. Why is the lamestream media not talking about this???

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      God I was looking for peertube apps and rumble was advertised in the app store. Boy did I have a surprise when I scrolled through the most subscribed list

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, don’t do that. The most popular content on YouTube isn’t bad in the same way it is on Rumble/Odyssey, but in general, it’s filled with clickbait/rage bait and is generally pretty awful. It’s going to be especially awful on Rumble and Odyssey because it’s a refuge for people who didn’t like YouTube’s policies, so it’s going to largely be conspiracy theorists and far right nonsense.

        That said, there’s some good on every platform. On Rumble, I like Glenn Greenwald, who is a right of center independent journalist who lives in Brazil (also gay, but that’s irrelevant). On Odyssey, I like Mental Outlaw (covers hacks, leaks, and privacy related news) and Naomi Brockwell (privacy advocacy). I don’t have an account at either, largely because those platforms are full of trash, I just sub through Grayjay so I don’t see that nonsense.

        I wish a credible alternative existed, but for now, I’ll hedge a bit with other platforms.

        • wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I remember, pre-wikileaks, when Glen Greenwald was left of center. Or at least that was my perspective at the time.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think he’s pretty centrist, but he does tend to defend Trump a bit (not a fanboy, but a “see what he does” position) and is against supporting Ukraine, which is why I say he’s right of center. He’s nowhere near the Republican Party though, he’s pretty independent.

            Regardless, I don’t really care where he sits on the left/right spectrum, I just appreciate an independent voice that backs statements with facts.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That happens on any platform that advertises itself as totally unmoderated and uncensored.

        Like itbor not, it’s the moderators and acceptable use policies that keep the nazis and other bad actors at bay.

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, the Jewish Jews are the LORD’s chosen, underdogs who are bravely soldiering the storm, but the American Jews are communist Satan worshippers who’ve sold their souls for control of the world. They’ve been battling for millenia to control the space lasers.

        Also, now that I’ve imagined it, there’s both porn and a Manga of it.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I recommend Amish porn instead. I dont think they are actually Amish but way better than jewish porn.

          • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Don’t forget, jews have to own the entire holy land before the apocalypse comes and god sends them to hell, according to evangelical Christians.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It all becomes clear once you understand that the Jews returning to Israel is a precondition for the Christian apocalypse. Christofascists don’t give a flying fuck about the Jews; they support Israel as a country (and Zionism in particular) for the entirely ghoulishly selfish reason that they wanna get ‘raptured.’

        • Korkki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          And you both are oversimplifying by putting the christian zionist nutjobs within the same basket with the vast array of other nutjobs and assume that they are all the same.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            All of our politicians are proud zionists, even if few are jews, or extreme evangelicals.

          • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Instead of dismissing you out of hand, I wouldn’t mind hearing what the big picture is that you see.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            oversimplifying by putting the christian zionist nutjobs within the same basket with the vast array of other nutjobs

            It’s a fairly compact venn diagram.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Imagine being Jewish and on either side people hate you.

        Right wing: Jews are behind everything

        Left wing: Jews are zionists and zionists are Nazis because Israel.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I don’t think left wing people are hating on Jewish people, except maybe those crazy “Marxist-Leninist” types. Not all Jewish people are pro-Natanyahu, in fact, many are probably against Netanyahu.

          • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I know very well that many Jews are against Netanyahu. All my relatives in Israel regularly protest that war criminal, along with tens of thousands of others.

            Doesn’t stop the majority on this site from equating Israel with Jews. I made the mistake of writing “mazel tov” as part of one of my previous comments and received all sorts of colourful inbox messages calling me a “Zionist” and a “colonizer”, despite being a Canadian haha.

            Just the hint of something Jewish invites everyone to yell about Gaza 🤪

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Lol.

      There’s some decent content if you look. I like Glenn Greenwald, and I sub to NBTV and Mental Outlaw on Odyssey. There’s a lot of nonsense on all platforms, but if you’re careful, you may find some decent stuff there. I wish more YouTubers would re-upload on other platforms, but I guess that’s asking too much…

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’d watch the shit outta that with some popcorn. Between the logic jumps and the mandatory hand-waving of actual evidence to the contrary, and sheer numbers of fallacies to make the argument make sense it sounds like a hella entertaining time

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, they’re trying new things again. Gotta squeeze that stone for all the blood that’s in it.

    One of my accounts has been getting a long delay before the video starts. Pre-roll ads are trying to load and play but the add-ons I have installed are still stopping them from completely succeeding. For now.

    I also have auto-play turned off, and I wonder if that has anything to do with it.

    Pretty sure the systems at their side think that I’m seeing the ads because I’ve had pop-ups during the delay offering free Premium.

  • Frellwit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    From the uBO subreddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1etvawp/youtube_ads_detection_breakages_2024_08_16_ubo/m31kbkw/

    There was just an update to Quick fixes. Please test if it works for you.

    1. Click Here to update the list.
    2. If you disabled the list previously, enable it back.
    3. Close all previously opened YT tabs and try in a new one.

    Just a reminder: Please always treat disabling lists as a last resort/temporary solution type of thing. Without that list, you won’t be receiving important filter updates and will likely encounter ads after a while. So don’t keep it disabled forever - verify that it’s still necessary (daily?).