• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    oh common. do you think thats a legitamate example. it was carved out of maryland and virginia for the specific purpose of being the capital with no state having authority over it.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      But I believe (correct me if I’m wrong, please) that it was also not meant to have a civilian population at all, and only be home to businesses, government offices, and those who were in elected office until they left and returned home. The absence of a civilian population would render the fact that DC has no representation in congress moot. But people started living there, causing the problem of having no representation in Congress.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        it was also not meant to have a civilian population at all

        Meaning that its population was almost entirely African-American and therefore to be ignored.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        yeah and the area is run by the federal government so not having federal representation is basically like not having state representation to boot.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And the people who live there don’t have representation in Congress, but that’s not the point.

      The point is that it’s not a state. Just “being a possession of the United States” doesn’t confer statehood.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        yes but again its not typical it was a very specific thing. The land had belonged to two different states. the guam, puerto rico, us virgin islands are similar but dc is in on way similar.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Alaska was purchased by the US in 1867. It didn’t get statehood until 1959.

          Being a possession of the United States of America does not automatically make it a state.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            true but its basically a bureaucracy thing at that point. as long as the it has a populace and they seek statehood its going to happen.