• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    They link to a source that shows if Kamala had been more conservative in these areas, she would’ve had more support:

    Immigration Fossil fuels Ukraine (withdrawing support)

    What the fuck does this have to do with anything? Is this just a desperate grasp for some result to boost centrism in general?

    Maybe MOST importantly is that the issues the polled on, in order of importance to voters, shows Gaza ranks LAST in importance.

    For the “Biden to Harris” voters. Of course it’s low importance to them (3%). That’s a key difference between those who stayed and those who didn’t. Which validates the whole point that it wouldn’t lose many votes. Few Harris voters cared about it, but the companion poll shows that those who didn’t vote for her did care.

    Even the source they linked is wrong: “New Poll Shows Gaza Was #1 Issue For Biden 2020 Voters Who Did Not Vote For Harris”

    Then the actual data disproves this. Neither for Biden voters who switched or Biden voters who backed Harris, it was not the top.

    There’s literally that exact question. Which is the one being referenced in the articles with specific percentages where Gaza was at the top.

    “Which one of the following issues was MOST important in deciding your [vote for presidential candidate/decision to not to vote for president]?”

    Also, the poll is exclusive to swing states.

    Ok? So? The other states literally don’t matter.