• VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse his control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

    Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

    Bad vibes, I say.

    For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

    Tldr - it’s a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

    AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      If Intel didn’t have yield issues for over a decade, wouldn’t they be much further ahead than AMD by now?

      Kinda weird how their production problems conveniently coincide with what will keep them “neck n’ neck” with the competition for as long as possible.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 days ago

        Intel made some massive mistakes with their post 14nm nodes, they overextended and fell on their own sword.

        Admittedly what Intel were aiming for with their “10nm” node had higher density than tsmc’s “7nm” (from memory), considering the timeframe that would have been another massive leap for Intel; and if they had pulled it off AMD would be struggling like the bulldozer days.

        22nm to 14nm Intel were on fire, almost seemed untouchable for quite some time. X99 was (in my eyes) the biggest leap in the right direction and probably their best consumer platform ever released. Huge cache, moar cores, pcie lanes for days and a refresh on their latest node (6950x).

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    276
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      127
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel’s scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

      What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

      I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Responsible to who?
      Of course they will sell if there’s a profit to be made. Companies exist to make profits, if they can make a profit from it, it’s actually their responsibility to the shareholders to do it.

      Maybe you mean responsible in some way that has to do with morals, but if you think morals apart from staying within the law, have any say in this whatsoever, you are being very naive. That’s not at all how the system works.

      That said I don’t see any other way than corruption for Musk to be interested. Musk buys Intel, and Trump doubles the subsidies to Intel and give them extra sweet government contracts. And everybody profit, except the stupid taxpayers including those that voted Trump.

      Only the law helps super capitalist narcissists to stay at least somewhat within moral norms.
      And in USA the law doesn’t even count anymore. So there you go, everything is fucked up, until Americans figure it out. Which means it will be fucked up for a loooong time.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 days ago

    Mixed feelings about this as someone with a relatively (per my portfolio) huge investment in Intel. It would result, eventually, in the end of Intel. But so many dumb people with so much money keep throwing money at his crap companies so it might work out in the short term to get out with a profit.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      On the social media front Elon literally knows nothing, but it’s impossible to deny that he hasn’t helped build 2 companies that know how to manufacturer complex hardware at scale. To deny that just shows ignorance.

      So while Intel has so many problems, and there’s the whole politics disaster side of things, he might not actually cause the end of Intel from a hardware perspective.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        I don’t know that he has helped build anything. He has helped hype 2 companies.
        He did great PR when someone was managing him, but recently his PR is poison.
        SpaceX is managed by someone competent, musk has - quite frankly - little to do with the company.
        Tesla is riding the hype from before musk took off the mask. I give them 4 years, tops. If it’s not already on the way down.

        Intel needs to be run and managed by engineers. That’s what we want from core components. Not hype, not bubbles, not marketing speak, not fancy names and confusing part numbers. We want actual engineers who have thought through the implications of their decisions all the way to the end consumer. We want hardware that works and is predictable.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Tom Mueller the person who was at SpaceX at the start would wholly disagree with you and says so online, as have other people, but instead people just say they are saving face and rely on anonymous sources to say he does jack all.

          So like I said, ignorance.

          It’s blissful sure, but it’s ignorance.

          Edit: there are plenty of reasons to hate and dunk on the dude, but people love to enhance it with stuff like he doesn’t and never did do anything to make their hate seem even more worthy. All it does though is make you look ignorant.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 days ago

        Reads more like the investment tanked and he’s hoping for a recovery.

        Shorting sounds nice though, long term.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think the point is the stock would actually go up if Musk buys it because people think he’s a great businessman, despite all the evidence to the country. So no need to short it, just sell at the peak and duck out before he manages to crash and burn. Again.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            I only have a very passing interest in the stock market and that’s only because I have my pension as relatively high risk stock (it’s not really that high of a risk, that’s just what they call it).

            But in the world with Apple, Google and and the traditional big car manufacturers, why on Earth when anyone invest in Tesla?

            • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              I agree. I keep hearing how terrible their cars are and we all know how much of a loon he is…surely anyone with any business sense would stay well away from that company, or companies affiliated with Musk? But what do I know…

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    Because that he’s the richest known man in the world, we’re going to see this asshole’s name crop up a lot as a potential buyer.

    Why can’t he just go fucking buy Facebook or something?

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      I thought the cross licensing deal between AMD and Intel basically collapses if one gets bought out?

      So intel wouldn’t be able to make 64 bit processors any more?

    • pineapplepizza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’m the short term it will be good for AMD, in the long term they will lose the need to invest in research and development, start cutting corners and up prices for sub par chips. Bad news for consumers.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Yep. Citizens’ United guaranteed that by allowing corporations to funnel an unlimited amount of money into campaigns.

        Just a heads up, if spending wasting egregious amounts of money didn’t influence the outcome of elections, why would people do it?

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    18 days ago

    On one hand “noooo!” But on the other this would be great for ARM and RISC-v if Intel tanks.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Screw ARM honestly, they don’t need any help. RISC-V though as the only open source of any significance, absolutely!

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        What about POWER9? You can buy a complete workstation right now, with an open source CPU, Board, BIOS. It’ll cost you an arm, a leg, and probably some more internal organs, but it is currently more functional than RISC-V.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            I mean, you probably heard of PowerPC. IBM kept working on that, is still working on it. They’re at Power10 now, but that has some proprietary blobs, as opposed to POWER9.

            I’d say that it’s mainly cool because it’s an architecture with enough performance for modern stuff, that is completely open source. No proprietary BIOS, no Management Engine running unknown code. Also, pretty stable, supposedly.

            Only supported by Linux, some BSDs, and some proprietary IBM *nixes, if you wanna say you have a system that literally can’t run Windows.

            If you want fun facts, the currently 9th most powerful supercomputer, Summit, runs on it, I guess.

            The hardware is too expensive for pretty much anyone to actually wanna use it, but oh well, what do you do.

            You can get yourself a workstation for about $10k here. https://www.raptorcs.com/content/TL2WK2/intro.html

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Technically it’s a third party developing a Framework board. Regardless, it’s cool that other companies even can design Framework boards, and it’s cool Framework are fully supportive of it!

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      Hooray for Risc-v, anyway.

      I think I joke too often about ruling benevolently over the world’s robots someday after everyone lays off their Cybersecurity staff.

      But if we continue this trend, this community may have the only clean secure laptops after everyone else sells out and fills their shit with backdoors.

      Maybe we can rule together as a benevolent collective…

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 days ago

    Everyone is focusing on Musk but uh, Global Foundries wants to be involved in buying Intel?

    The same Global Foundries that’s utterly incapable of progressing their tech stack?

    The one AMD created when they got rid of their foundries and was happy to do so?

    That amuses the shit out of me.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      AMD wasn’t quite “happy” to sell their fabs, it was necessitated because they were facing bankruptcy. People forget but the prevailing opinion was that AMD was going to bankrupt within a few years.

      Their pre-Su CEO, Rory Read, often gets shit online for being there during a bad period, but he made some difficult and necessary decisions that saved AMD. Part of that was the GF selloff.

      I highly doubt Global Foundries is even in the position to buy Intel, they’d most likely want to give them a cash infusion in exchange for tech or for selling fabs (which intel would probably accept, since their fabs are currently under-utilised… in other words they have too much capacity, and yet are still building more because Chips Act says they have to). That would be good for GF.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      I worked at intel for a while. It deserves to be destroyed. But I live in an area with a lot of well off intel employees. It could tank my house value among other major impacts to the community. Like I am sure he would kill the matching donation stuff which would be a significant reduction of the amount of money non profits get in this area. So I hope the destruction is slow enough for other chip companies in the area to absord some of the workers.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I was about to get extremely upset, and then I remembered I haven’t used intel since 2012.