What keeps you away from PeerTube? What features does PeerTube lack? If you were the developer of PeerTube, how would you improve it?

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think the biggest thing for everyone is discovery.

    I also think the worst parts of youtube are baked into the videos themselves now so re-uploads are just a worse experience even without the buffering.

    • asudox@lemmy.asudox.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s basically YouTube, but FOSS, federated and has P2P functionality to lessen the stress on the server that will be streaming the video to the user.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Peertube is to Youtube what Lemmy is to Reddit. Individual instances host the content uploaded by that instance’s members, viewers can browse the entire federation. To help with server load, Peertube has a P2P function; if 100 people are watching the same video at the same time, some of them will upload parts of the video they’ve already downloaded to others.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m considering starting a channel on Peertube about woodworking. There’s an instance that focuses on makers, arts & crafts, DIY and such, sounds like a damn good home for “Howdy folks, today we’ll be building this cherry coffee table.”

      If I make these videos, will you watch them?

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah man, why not, update here I’d love to check it out!

        Maybe I should upload some content too :)

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Okay, give me a couple months. It’s winter and my shop is unheated so I’m in project pause mode, plus I’m going to have a surgery to recover from in February.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I mostly watch youtube on my firetv stick and I don’t bother with sideloading. ill check to see if an app has come up but their annoying store is well. annoying. its not really a problem with peertube. I am going to try using it whenever I would otherwise watch youtube on my laptop but its not very often.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          yeah. basically it would be great that once you made an account you could just use that for other parts of the fediverse. bonus if it could bring over common settings like language or porn adversity.

  • Bezier@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Proper grayjay integration. Though last time I tried peertube, there wasn’t much to watch anyway.

  • ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Regarding the first question, for me PeerTube has a similar problem as with other fediverse stuff, which besides a lack of greater adoption is a scarcity of sites with a positive, distinct identity/community (last I checked at least) to encourage more people to use it.

    Off the top of my head in terms of PeerTube, only TILvids.com comes to mind, which is cool, but remains primarily tech and specifically Linux-related educational videos. I don’t mind that, but it’d be cool to see a broader range of educational content on there.

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Controversial opinion: I think PeerTube should add support for paid-access content as you could then persuade the creators on Nebula to join. Since they are promoting their YT-alternative already, this would mean extra PeerTube publicity and users for free.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I don’t pay for YouTube Premium because (a) I can already block ads and (b) YouTube doesn’t offer what I would pay for, which is a no-log, no-profiling policy. As it is, paying just means that YouTube can link my financial details to my profile.

      I do pay for Kagi.

      I’d be willing to pay for something like YouTube Premium if someone could make something like YouTube Premium, adopted a no-log, no-profile policy, and charged $15/month or something like that. I’m not sure how many people would be willing to do that, though. And there are other challenges:

      • I don’t know if a privacy-oriented commercial streaming service is what the people who are working on PeerTube actually want to make.

      • I think that it will be difficult, though not impossible, to build the kind of content and userbase that YouTube has – it has network effect, which favors large incumbents.

  • squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    The PeerTube Android App is a huge step forward, but it needs two important features to be a viable YouTube alternative:

    • possibility to login with my account
    • functionality to cast to Chromecast or similar devices
    • more content (not a feature)
  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago
    1. Hard to get into and discover channels
    2. Services like Grayjay, which can put together both recommendations from PeerTube and YouTube and other platforms for some reason only pull the oldest content from PeerTube
    3. A lack of community outside the biggest Linux YouTubers

    A few solutions might be to…

    1. Somehow find a way to have the PeerTube app work with YouTube
    2. Include subscriptions for channels so YouTubers can use PeerTube as a better patreon or ko-fi for storing videos and sharing content
    3. Promote better videos which may entice others to stay longer, have users consistently promote the service personally
    • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I definitely could see a lot more usage of PeerTube if Grayjay could work better together with it, maybe enabled by default

      The inverse of this is just doing what Grayjay does but on the PeerTube app instead

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Right at this moment: content and performance.

    If I start looking around at Peertube, will I find anything I’m interested in watching? There’s a LOT on Youtube right now, what’s on Peertube?

    There’s a tendency for alternative platforms to be wretched hives of scum and villainy. LBRY for example felt like the place racist shitheads were banished to when banned from Youtube. The difference between LBRY and Peertube seems to be “something something blockchain.”

    I noticed a video from a channel called The Giddy Stitcher titled “How to start a (good) Flosstube channel” which for a second I took to mean Free Libre Open Source Software tuber, as if she was going to give tips on how to run an channel on Peertube. No, apparently “floss” = textile arts/string/whatever and that term is similar to “woodtube” for Paul Sellers et al. She apparently uses Peertube to mirror her Youtube videos, and gets thousands of views per video on Youtube and maybe a dozen views on Peertube.

    Anyway, watching this video, it buffered HARD. It got better after awhile but…you remember how, back in the day, you could just pause a video and it would buffer? And how it kinda doesn’t anymore? It was also that. They don’t offer lower qualities below 720p50 which probably doesn’t help; I’ve seen Youtube jump all the way down to 144p to keep the video playing at all.

    I know, Peertube is “some people” while Youtube is run by Alphabet. But, maybe we should standardize on lower resolutions and aspire to HD later on, huh?

  • joytoy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    PeerTube overall lacks decent support for subtitles, which is my answer to all of the questions. Veronica Explains is (so far) the only channel I make an effort to watch on PeerTube because she provides subtitles.

    I’d be more than happy with terrible machine-generated subtitles at the bare minimum since they are enabled by default on YouTube when uploading a video. Accessibility is quite important imo