• dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    When I mentioned that all this went down for a mere fraction of what everyone else paid, her immediate reaction was: “Well, isn’t that what China does with just about everything?”

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    3 days ago

    Neo-Liberalism: Let’s hire anyone from anywhere, just the best candidates no matter what, no other values but who we can extract the most value from. Let’s also take money from the government and lobby them to defund themselves and the country’s services to give us even more money.

    Oh wow! How does China steal our tech?! Why wasn’t the government funding education and security to protect us?!?

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah the original comment in this chain more describes US Telcos and shit, not this particular instance.

        • Fungah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s what they said basically.

          Like. You can compile better or more diverse datasets to train a model on. But you can also have better code training on the same dataset.

          The model is what the code poops out after its eaten the dataset I haven’t read the paper so no idea if the better training had to do with some super unique spin on their dataset but I’m assuming its better code.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Do you want my boss to ask me who I voted for and who I pray for? Are you crazy? That’s not their business. They HAVE to hire based on the value they’ll give to the company

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the third time I’ve seen this exact image used in relation to this. First was a YouTube video, second was a mastodon post, and now this. Not sure who started it, but I feel it’s kinda racist and just shitty. I get the reference, but it’s nothing more than “haha, asian guy that was on computer stuff show”.

    • dovahking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why do you people get offended on our behalf for even the most minuscule thing. What’s racist about it? On the contrary, it’s fucking awesome that some Chinese manage to do this with a meager sum in such time. Why would I want people to use a non Asian person to represent an Asian guy?

      • Avenging5@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        my taking offense isn’t even because of the race mostly. it’s because they are saying it’s a clone of o1. Of which it is not. That’s some very good development that’s been done and open sourced so anyone can use it for free which is being overshadowed by the fact that it happened in China and not 'murica

      • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What’s racist about it?

        It’s because people the meme states that DeepSeek didn’t accomplish anything novel. That the real innovation was done in America with ChatGPT. And there is a narrative that the Chinese are not original, but only really good at copying other people’s work often using inferior parts. That last part, while not explicit in the meme, is in the culture.

        My understanding is that what DeepSeek did was novel for the training data it used l. However, there are some experts who question the ability to train the model using the limited budget they claimed and their understanding of the field would require far more processing power. I think there’s a non-racist and racist way of interpreting and answering this question.

        Edit: it’s also important that this is a shit post.

        You can decide if this post is racist or not. https://lemmy.ml/post/25316007

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Saying company A copied company B isn’t racist. Those clsims are made all the time. This is really digging to make it racist.

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You said

              What’s racist about it?

              It’s because people the meme states that DeepSeek didn’t accomplish anything novel. That the real innovation was done in America with ChatGPT.

              You literally said claimed that as what was racist about it…

              Again, companies being accused of copying isn’t racist. You made it racist by injecting the countries they were developed in and bringing in stereotypes.

              • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Yes. Those are the first two sentences of the paragraph. But the idea is contained in the paragraph which describes the process from those two sentences to racist idea.

                I think your other claim is better, that I was digging. But I think in today’s environment racism is rarely explicitly. It is implicit and easily denied. It can also be unintended. And I think those claiming it’s racism can be wrong. And even in failing, can legitimately point to something in the culture that conditions the interpretation of statements like this.

                What was more important was describing the process.

                • Lightor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It wasn’t just the first few lines, it was the direct answer to the question though, that was my sticking point.

                  I get how racism can be deep under the surface, like a sort of “shadow racism” but I think assuming there’s racism at play can be damaging as well. I get where you’re coming from, I guess I just don’t agree with the arrived at point.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      His character tried to make cheap Chinese knockoffs of all major platforms and products.

      Deep dive is a cheap Chinese knockoff of ChatGPT.

      It’s a good joke, Bront

      • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not really a cheap knockoff though, it’s a revolution in efficiency. It proved that you don’t need $100m to beat the best models if you show a bit of ingenuity

        It’s like building a boat to cross a lake when everyone around you is trying to use their car by adding tires to increase buoyancy (nvidia are the ones selling tires)

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      I love how it being inefficient seemed to be its biggest selling point too lol.

      Wait, it’s not going to use up all of the world’s resources? Nevermind, I don’t want that.

  • cheeseburger@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Ok, if I decide to do this, I’ll need an unlimited supply of Xena tapes and Hot Pockets.”

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Chinese ChatGPT

      Why are you clapping me, I’m wrong? I thought everything on the board was “chinese facebook” etc, but infact, the guy I replied to is right.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Make it in a quebeqi strip club with a bunch of Université de Montréal students, while eating poutine and drinking maple syrup in milk.

          The only music allowed in the background is Tech Death with fretless bass or gorguts. Basically any band that Forest has been in. Canadian Content rules apply.

          Also, the source code must be billingual. (ENG/FR, OBV)

          STUPID EDIT : No British Colombia(ns) allowed, what is this, a movie? That also includes Archspire as background listening.

          EDIT2 : That’s people from the province of British Colombia or use of British Colombia as a location; British people from Colombia or Colombians from Britain are allowed as long as they are currently living in a non British Colombia Canadian Province.

  • GuitarSon2024@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re telling me a country that could give a flying fuck about international patent law copied and replicated something? Say it ain’t so.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    fuck altman! like he cloned and boiled down everyone elses knowledge to his stupid llm. just a google figured out a while back: everyone can always make a better AI. just drop your grandmas cooking receipes in there and bam you’ve got the bigger dataset.

    americas bitchin and wining is so maga. can they maybe just shut up or dumb down to orange? the orange said “i see it as an asset” - go watch the imbecile in his pressconference on monday. dumbo thinks a chinese corpo that killed 1tn $ is an asset to him.

    we all just can praise deepseek for proving once again that most americans are below 3rd graders.

  • This is how the US AI-dev sector decides to proceed at flank speed without safeguards towards friendly AI, leading to a robot apocalypse, sparing us from climate-crisis-induced famine!

    • jdf038@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I feel like the robots have already earned their leadership

      Welcome robot overlords etc etc

      • Fungah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Increasingly I feel like our only hope for the future is somehow achieving ASI and that it somehow is benevolent in spite of our numerous failings as a species and KT basically starts manipulating us or directly controlling us away from self destruction.

        There are so many doomsday scenarios on the horizon that if it ends up being evil we may at least be able to take it down with us.