I think it already has.

Game recognizes game.

If the show was rejigging to this, but without reminding me of the existence of The Republican party. Like it’s just evil doers trying to get their plans done each week…m

NGL would watch.

What an aggravatingly stupid article. May as well have just written “I have no idea what’s going on in politics or society, and can’t we all just get along?!” 5,000 times - absolute dross. Pathetic.

Codeine is a respectable recreational drug a few swigs of that and some Valium and you’ll have an entertaining enough time (except for the constipation).

Much better than being haunted by level seven entities on a cough syrup bender.

Of course this is incorrect, go look up an empire and see.

… Roman empire got over 1000 years, Ottoman’s got 623 years, Mongol empire only got 162.

…and Italy, Turkey, and Mongolia are still around, they’re just not empires anymore. They’re Nations.

“Deleted by creator”… God has been here.

Elvis had to be wary of ricochets from shooting at these TVs.

New meaning to the term “insider”.

Screwworms are currently in negotiations with the Trump administration.

Depends on where you think this is all going: Reaganomics or Genocide.

If it is Genocide you shouldn’t be discussing this, and should be forming resistance cells.

If you think it’s Reagonomics, visible protests can help form mutual aid networks and a collective action front that increases solidarity and save lives.

Two different approaches depending on where you think things are heading.

You’ll often find discussions in the comments section (also your first comment to me asked me to explain my views).

You seem deaf to what I’m saying. There are cultural tensions involved. Yes people choose their ethical compliances but those choices are always constrained by cultural, educational, and structural bounds. The cultural messaging of the time.

Before this generation were the first school shooters, before them it was satanic panic related crimes, before them it was the first post WW2 street gangs.

These are all topics that insert violence into cultural frameworks without having the necessary discussions of causes and the messaging around these frameworks.

I’d call your user name “weird”, but I’m not one to use social pressures like that, and would rather have conversations where the actual issues and causes are discussed.

I’m trying to normalize that singles aren’t having sex…

… because the feeling that young men not having sex is abnormal causes a bad mindset.

Yeah they think it’s extraordinary to not be having sex when single, so it’s women’s fault.

When being sexless is the majority of what being single means.

Reaganomics 2.0

So the anti-terrorism laws have been used before and apply to all terrorism…

My comment is mocking that incel - which basically means single and upset about it, is being made central to the headline.

Just say he’s a misogynist. Pretending it’s something abnormal for single men to not be having sex just extends the premise of “incels” (the idea that they should be upset about it, or that it’s extra).

PNAT laws increase the severity of all terrorism related prosecutions. They aren’t aimed at “incels” in particular.

Hitler, great replacement, and communicating with women, aren’t incel traits. That last one in particular.

That’s far-right stuff.

Plenty of leftwing incels.

The perfect is the enemy of the good. They’re building habits, getting the numbers up. Practicing.