• 7 Posts
  • 1.96K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 19th, 2024

help-circle












  • DarkCloud@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldIt's all latestage
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Not even, it’s just corruption getting too stable ultimately results in voter instability - as people are enticed to vote for ANYTHING BUT business as usual.

    This means Obama’s Hope And Change is just as likely to be voted for as Trump’s “Grab them by the Pussy” because they equally appear to be offering a shift from the norms of the Capo-democratic swamp.

    Meanwhile they’re both actually unfettered “too big to fail” Capitalism, with all its “make the rich richer, corrupt democracy further” aspects intact.

    So Capitalism creates its own threat, and hence marches on oscillating democracy to its own needs like the perfect parasite.

    The parasite won’t give you what you want. The corrupt won’t volunteer to end corruption. You have to smash the windows grab the parasite and squeeze the life out of it before you can issue genuine ideological reforms and take back a fairer system.

    Sometimes violence is what’s necessary. The “slow fix” of democracy only works when the right radical candidates have the right free hand to make the right radical changes, and corruption tends to prevent that.

    I suppose this is a “tough time” but it’s caused by moderate Neo-Liberal freemarket and often nominally democratic Capitalists.


  • Neo-Liberaliam / Economic Liberalism is part of what got Trump elected. The sense that Capitalism was beyond the reach of meaningful governance, and will always just aid the wealthy getting wealthier - created a hunger for radical change.

    People end up just wanting radical change out of frustration, regardless of what direction that change takes (left or right). They just want a break in unrelenting Capitalism.

    Which explains why for many, Bernie, AOC, and Trump, were all likable/popular choices at the same time.

    Newsome as a moderating figure will prevent any strong shift away from the service of Capitalism as above all else, and hence is a huge danger to the politics of equilibrium. It’s ratchet theory, keeps things stuck.

    … Neo-Liberals should be embarrassed to admit who they are, because they caused this, by claiming that Capitalism and deregulation is a moderate position (steering the ship of state between the left and the right) - when infact that’s an economic extremist viewpoint which excuses inept government and the corruptions of money… and when perpetuated infinitum as it is, it becomes the cause of voter radicalism.

    Neo-Liberal economic policies create the unshifting corruption and two-tier “too big to fail, too rich to jail” system that people want to vote against.

    In this sense Newsome is dead weight, representing Bidenism 2.0. Neo-Liberals should be ashamed of themselves for not just accepting their part in creating the quagmire, but wanting to continue it.





  • He knows that

    a) pod racing brings other good stuff (tourism, commerce, street vendors).

    b) the pod racing industry are wealthy and can take the hit. Rather than betting against other gamblers he’s betting against bookies (the gambling industry).

    c) homegrown hero stories bring the planet closer to supporting rebellion politics.