Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez urged countering the Trump administration’s policies by resisting at every turn, arguing that its incompetence makes it vulnerable.

Her remarks followed chaos caused by a rescinded executive order that temporarily shut down Medicaid portals nationwide.

She encouraged activists to take offline action, citing ongoing mobilization efforts.

Her strategy focuses on making governance difficult for Trump, calling his administration “dangerous and cruel” but also “shockingly dim.”

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It isn’t chump and his taintsuckers you gotta worry about.

    It’s the army of Federalist Society lawyers and policy experts around him. They’ve spent decades figuring out the removed in the armor of our governmental system. Figuring out how to dismantle it piece by piece.

    Edit - wtf is that removed about? Wait…oh. bot thinks I did a racism.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        .ml replaces certain words with “removed”

        In this case it seems to have been this term.

        The “r” word will be removed too.

        I haven’t noticed what the others are. I swear fairly often and those haven’t been removed. I would guess only things that are slurs etc.

        Edit: It was removed from my link as well. LOL. Look up “gap in suit of armor” if you haven’t figured it out already. Kinda ironically, when it’s used as a slur it’s against chinese people.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ha. Reminds me of an Asian standup comedian who had this routine about how he grew up in the inner city where the basketball nets were made of chains and so the chains didn’t go ‘swish,’ they went ‘chіnk.’ So when guys wanted to play basketball, they said, “let’s go shoot us up some chіnk.”

      Thank you, Cyrillic letter і, for letting me bypass the bot to tell that joke. Because I’ve remembered that joke for years.

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              I really need someone to explain all the random marxist leninists bogey-man bigotry that happens on this site at some point. Like this is a completely weird-o comment, about a political ideology that’s effecting a word filter for possible rascism? and on .world people still label it marxist?!

              I’m aware there is deep historical connotations which I haven’t spent years researching so I try not to defend or participate but it feels like since people push back against “instance hating”, we’ve gotta pour on any political hatred we could possibly see in the shadows. I’m just gonna assume this is another bad faith comment striking up fear and hatred till I learn otherwise.

                • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  .ml is Mali and marxist-leninists tend to use .ml as their hosting domain of choice the way that a lot of Generative AI domains are hosted in Anguilla because of the .ai domain.

                • door_in_the_face@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  They’re asking what automod removing an out of context word has to do with marxism/ leninism. This kind of error can happen on any instance that automatically removes slurs, and that particular one isnt exactly commonly used either way.

                • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Am I still missing something? This is posted on the instance of .world, wtf are we talking about .ml and politics for? If your instance filters your comments on other instances than that’s concerning and something I didn’t know.

                  edit: removed the sarcasm in the hopes someone actually responds to what the problem is.

              • Soggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Man, it’s just classic tribalism and confirmation bias. People assume the most obnoxious voices are representative of all Communist spaces and that’s poisoned a lot of perception here. Folks love having a villain to pick on and reddit.world here has decided “tankies are the bad guy”.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fucken hell, that’s the correct fucking way to define a gap in armor. Bullshit. I really want to try a bunch of slurs out and see what sets it off.

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Jebus. I still haven’t figured out if .ml is government funded or true believers. Very strange to me.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s the home instance of the founders of Lemmy, who are communists. I don’t know their views on authoritarian communism like Stalin or Mao, but people who thought these were good leaders are the “tankies” you may have heard of. There are a lot of them on .ml.

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve basically only ran into 90% left wing, sporadic sprinklings of conservative, tankie, liberal, other. “A lot of them” is pulling extra weight here.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I must be a classy enlightened centrist since I have never had my words removed.

          Entire comments removed & bans, on the other hand…

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wait until you try the in-game chat in Rocket League. You can’t even type “Discord”. It’s a banned word. 🤡

        • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          They’re probably trying to prevent people spamming discord invite links in game. I don’t necessarily have an issue with that. If someone got invited to a scam discord server from RL chat, blowback would definitely hit RL for allowing that on-ramp. If you vibe with someone and want to invite them to a discord server to enable teaming up easier, you can always send them the code after the discord.gg/ part of the link.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s gotta be it, yeah. You’re absolutely right.

            Although typing in another language is absolutely impossible, at least for us in Sweden. So many basic words get bleeped, even if the banned word is only part of a larger word. An example: “I have to stop playing now” -> “Jag måste sluta spela nu”. “slut” is banned, sentence looks like this: “Jag måste ***** spela nu”

            And it’s like that for like a substantial amount of sentences. So we’ll just go on Discord to talk. But we can’t say “hop on discord” or similar, so we just immediately say “disc” 😆

      • Carl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I really want to try a bunch of slurs out

        This is surely the most rational reaction to being slightly inconvenienced by a word filter.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 month ago

          SEE WHAT YOU’RE MAKING ME DO? NOW I HAVE TO SAY THE N WORD… I DON’T WANT TO BUT YOU GAVE ME NO CHOICE!

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’d be slightly curious about why a child would make that particular dying wish, why they think anyone really has the power to either grant (if the wish is to say it without anyone thinking badly of them) or prevent that wish (if they just want to be able to say it, they already can), but mostly just lose any sympathy I might have had for the kid because I wouldn’t expect any good answer to that first question.

            • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              “What if I come up with an entirely fictitious, nigh-impossible combination of circumstances to try and corner you into accepting my racial prejudice?”

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                also the answer is yes. Just because it’s a last wish doesn’t make it okay. it’s not like you can wish to do crimes for example.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          Anyone else remember Neopets? They had a filter that was extreme and multilingual. I can’t count how many times I’d write a friendly message, the filter would block it, and I would end up editing chunks of text trying to avoid whatever word or series of letters the filter thought was inappropriate. Sometimes it’d be a few letters embedded in another word (like “associate” being banned for the letters a s s.) But sometimes, I was truly stumped. The only explanation I can think of is that some letters in English words matched up to swears in other languages.

          Anyway, fun fact - I met my first boyfriend through that site. We decided to see how dirty we could talk while still getting messages past the filter. We used innuendos, slang, and other turns of phrase with each other just to see what we could get away with.

          In the end, all that filter did was make us more creative at communicating forbidden topics. Whoops ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nintendo still does this. There are pokemon names you can’t use as nicknames because it gets filtered. Most recently: Moltres EX gets caught by the filter on TCG Pocket and you can’t label your deck after it. “Violet” was blocked on an older game because “viol” is French for “rape”. Lazy, overcorrecting filter.

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Would a younger kid have understood what was being talked about or would it have gone over their head like the dirty jokes in kids cartoons? If the latter, the filters did their job. Neopets was probably one of the rare instances where parents actually signed the permission slips for their under 13 year old kids to use the social aspects. I know my parents did and it was the only site they ever did that for.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t mind removed, but the group of people I don’t care for is the removed. They’re almost as bad as removed!

  • skhayfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    That would be a great plan if the Dems were not spineless at best and complicit at worse

    • daggermoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      People see comments like this and get discouraged to vote or do anything meaningful. Life is choosing the lesser of two evils. By not choosing you have chosen the greater evil thus making you complicit.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        People see comments like this and get discouraged to vote or do anything meaningful.

        So shut up and be happy.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Bullshit. Electoral reform in the blue states must happen. Red states as well but we all know republicans stance on more democracy.

        Democrats have lost their “we are the only people resisting the republicans” privilege. They should have lost it long ago but we sure gave em every chance we could. No more chances, no more safe states/seats.

        This shouldn’t be hard to pass. Alaska already has a Ranked choice voting system. Plus Democrats are huge democracy supporters… right?

        Videos on Electoral Reform

        First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

        Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

        STAR voting

        Alternative vote

        Ranked Choice voting

        Range Voting

        Single Transferable Vote

        Mixed Member Proportional representation

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Judging from the downvotes, there are plenty of liberals who benefit from the status quo and choosing to be tone deaf.

        • lurklurk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you do electoral reform in just the blue states, you strengthen the republicans who will then take all of the red states, and get a bit of some blue states

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Who says electoral reform only happens in blue states? Alaska has always been Republican since the beginning of its statehood but they have better electoral system with its ranked choice voting.

            Fact of the matter is that most Americans are somewhere in the middle, and have more in common than you would be led to believe. Social media being controlled by powers that be divide and conquer the hearts and minds of ordinary Americans. If Alaska managed to even have a progressive system despite being a red state, then so are others. Get like-minded people in red states to also organise. Contrary to stereotype, there are many conservatives who are sane and also agree that money in politics is the major problem. You just haven’t found them.

            • lurklurk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Who says electoral reform only happens in blue states?

              The comment I replied to

              Electoral reform in the blue states must happen. Red states as well but we all know republicans stance on more democracy.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That lesser evil still don’t want Medicare for all, raise the federal minimum wage, and building more affordable housing-- all of which are actually what suffocate many Americans in the ever worsening wealth inequality. That’s why people took the chance to vote Trump who promised tax cut, even though most Americans know they it doesn’t actually benefit them but the 1%.

        Look outside of the American mainstream news bubble and discourse that want you to pick the two lesser evils, instead of thinking outside the box. The only way for ordinary Americans to win basic rights is to organise and mobilise by advocating both ranked choice voting and promoting third parties. It won’t happen in federal level so start on the local and state levels, and the changes will go up the chain to federal level. It’s not like Americans haven’t gone and out mobilised before for a better change. The people simply need to rediscover that they have the power.

        • lurklurk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Let the greater of two evils win until there’s a perfect option to vote for. Got it.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Eight hour working day, even the basic implementation of minimum wage, forbidding child labour, abolishing slavery, women being allowed to work outside their home and even 14-day paid leave were once considered “not perfect”.

            Do you know how these aforementioned basic rights and privileges we take for granted were actually achieved? Organising. But of course liberals won’t get it. They benefit from the status quo. Either that or many Americans have been conditioned to think within an allowed frame of discourse by corporations and its media.

            • lurklurk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Hey, if you organise but vote D in the cases where it’s the best chance to keep R out, I’m happy

              If you don’t vote D in the cases where it’s the best chance to keep R out, you’re effectively supporting R regardless what you’re telling yourself. If you’re also organising, nice, but if your organising is to convince more people to effectively support R like you, we’d all be better off if you quit.

              • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Who says vote D or R? Organise to have other third parties. They may not have a chance to win in federal elections, but they do well in local and state elections. Then work your way up to influence the federal government (and it’s not like there has never been a third party gaining seats in Congress and Senate).

                Read the quote from Noam Chomsky. You’re being bamboozled to think tribally. You probably just don’t hear about third parties in local and state level because the media wants you think within a spectrum of thoughts they allow people to have. Think outside the box. There are many other options.

                • lurklurk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Go for it, but also vote D where they’re the only realistic option to R.

                  Otherwise, support for a third party becomes support for R, as previously with the greens

        • sudo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Bad Change - Republicans
          “Fundamentally nothing will change” - Democrats
          Change Americans need - ?

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You will be happy with the breadcrumbs we give you or you are getting a bad change from Republicans. - Democrats

            Americans want Medicare for all, raising minimum wage and affordable housing, which Democrats are voting down. If you don’t recognise that then you benefit from the status quo and refuse to admit it.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              You will be happy with the breadcrumbs we give you or you are getting a bad change from Republicans. - Democrats

              You will be happy with the bad change we give you because the bad change from republicans will be worse - democrats.

              • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Hang on. You’re saying that Democrats want bad change. But the other guy says nothing will change. Do liberals want change or no change? I’m so confused. No wonder the Democrats would rather lose.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Hang on. You’re saying that Democrats want bad change. But the other guy says nothing will change. Do liberals want change or no change? I’m so confused.

                  Two people can speculate differently concerning the same set of circumstances. I hope this clears things up for you.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used to work for social services in Colorado. There was a Lady there that was fired without cause. She fought it, won in court, got her job back, and I’m pretty sure back pay. Beth, talking bout you, she said always fight, she has and it has always paid off.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        A lot of times, the manager that caused all that trouble by firing you doesn’t get to be a manager anymore.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        In that position you’re far more protected from retaliation than a “regular person” – it’s easier to prove with an established history and courts really don’t like have their judgments undermined. You’ve also shown your employer trying to screw with you is expensive.

        Go back and do your job to the letter. They’re either going to be very wary of pissing you off, or they’re going to do something stupid and you’ll get another payout.

  • houstoneulers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    I also think we ought to stop being consumers at a broad level. It’s clear the rich don’t actually trickle anything down and instead hoard it to invest. So, they won’t spend to prop up the economy.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      For one, stop using Amazon. Cancel Prime. Use other search engines than Google. Don’t use WhatsApp. Cancel and delete your Instagram, Facebook and Twitter if you haven’t already. Don’t buy Apple products.

      For each of those services and products above, there is at least one alternative.

  • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem is decades ago Democrats did not make changes to help the poor and lower middle classes fast enough and extreme enough to show that they were the party of the common worker and get a dominant position for multiple election cycles, allowing them to put in policies to stop inflation.

    Do you want Jesus/religion and extreme poverty for the lower classes?

    or Do you want abortion and mild poverty for the lower classes?

    Moral wedge issues resulted in a lot of lost votes because for decades Democrats offered only minimal or marginal economic benefits for the lower classes. Their platform was so conservative they lost power completely over moral wedge issues and now can’t get it back. Also, now the US is in so much debt that something like DOGE (which is covert austerity measures camouflaged as conservatism) is actually prudent and necessary.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      DOGE is not prudent or nessessary, its “we have tried nothing and were all out of ideas”. There has not been a proper budget in decades, we do not give the IRS the resources to go after wealthy tax evaders and we keep giving tax breaks to those least in need of them…

      Both parties have failed at gaining the political will to fix anything and now that the scales are tipped in the GOPs favor, they alone opt to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

      • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even if you are right, and you may be, other forms of austerity measures or balanced budgets etc simply haven’t been politically feasible to implement, otherwise they would have been done. My point is that Democrats could have prevented this whole mess by offering the poor a more more lucrative platform, so lucrative that perhaps they cared less about religion and moral wedge issues, but they clung to a more moderate platform, allowing wedge issues to become a large factor in how people voted, leading to the present situation.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just hope she comes out of this unscathed. It only takes one loon with a shiv… and now there’s millions of 'em.

  • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    finally, a person with a STRATEGY. so sick of the whining.

    she needs volunteers for personal escort and safety. i think she is going to be targeted.

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    He is definitely confused, weak and incompetent, backed by confused, weak and incompetent Republicans.

    • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let’s just hope they are so incompetent that they can’t do as much harm as they would like to. Fingers crossed.

  • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    If all Dems had her tenacity and honest interest in helping the middle class, we wouldn’t be where we are.

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dems Politicians FTFY sorry sometimes we forget because republicans/right are so pro rich class.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not that people don’t mention Republicans in statements like that because they’re letting them off the hook; it’s that they don’t bother mentioning them because they’re a lost cause.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Eh, I wouldn’t go that far. They aren’t acting like Republicans; they are acting normal despite the abnormal situation.

            In fact, that’s the problem: they should’ve acted more like the Republicans, in the sense of forcefully pushing through changes and daring the opposition to stop them (except good things instead of cartoonishly evil ones). But that would go against their nature, representing the neoliberal status quo.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Eh, I wouldn’t go that far. They aren’t acting like Republicans; they are acting normal despite the abnormal situation.

              They adopted republican border policy and ran republican anti-trans talking points in their own ads. They supported strikebreaking and genocide. I said they acted like republicans because they did.

  • StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s important to know that a lot of productive activity is happening in person and offline, too,” she said. “Not all of it can be broadcast online, but we’ve had hundreds of people showing up to our trainings, mobilizations, and more. Keep going. Tyranny is eroded by a sea of small acts. Everything matters.”

  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would love to start something in my city, and I’ve already been trying, but it’s hard to get people to mobilize. It’s disheartening at the very least. Any ideas on how I can be helpful to my country aside from voting?

    • NoEsReal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Get involved in mutual aid groups if possible. Those folks will be able to guide you best on how to be effective in your community.

        • NoEsReal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Do what you can now and keep your mind open to new opportunities. This isn’t a sprint, it’s a marathon. Don’t burn yourself out looking to do everything you possibly can. The important thing is to build that muscle of direct action instead of letting it atrophy through complacency or learned helplessness. That way, when you’re really needed you’ll be able to mobilize.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Senate: "We can’t hear you over conforming Trump’s Secretary of State nomination unanimously!“

    Said Secretary, Marco Rubio: immediately bans accurate passports for trans, nongender, and intersex people 🤦🤬