Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that restoring Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is “unrealistic,” signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward negotiated settlements.

Speaking at NATO headquarters, he argued that pursuing full territorial recovery would prolong the war and emphasized the need for security guarantees without NATO membership or U.S. troops in Ukraine.

Hegseth outlined Trump’s approach of reducing Russian war funding through increased U.S. energy production while shifting more military support responsibility to Europe.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s just “Ukraine”. “The Ukraine” implies that it’s a territory and not the name of an independent country.

    • pathos@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Technically it’s both, given the etymology of the word. Just as you say ‘The United States of America’ or ‘The Republic of Congo’.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Except it’s not like that. “The Ukraine” is how it was referred to when it was part of Russia. “Ukraine” is correct.

        • pathos@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          You might want to look up the historic usage. And I don’t mean the slavic etymology nor soviet russia. It has been named both until the article became a politicized matter. So if you want to object to me accidentially implying I would not affirm the independence of Ukraine as a country, then I understand that.

          • moakley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I have looked it up. That’s why I’m correcting you.

            The country changed it in 1991, which is the year they got their independence.

            “Ukraine” means “borderland”. Adding “the” in front of it makes it descriptive: the borderland of a larger nation. Removing the “the” makes it a name, which it is, because it’s its own country.

            I don’t correct people unless I’ve already looked it up. And I don’t continue the conversation without looking it up again. Just say “Ukraine”.

            • pathos@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Given how you seem to need justifying your correction, I wonder what’s the point of it in the first place. I have used the term both with and without the article, obviously disregarding the political implications I am aware of.

                • pathos@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Because the content of my post already makes it clear that my position and perspective is on the side of Ukraine. I am not a diplomat, nor a politician nor a political speaker. Political correctness serves no point in my post and therefore was not relevant over my linguistic idiosyncrasies.