LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 15 days agoNATO Infantrysh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageNATO Infantrysh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squarethr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·15 days agomk16 for DMR - why does this make it the worst?
minus-squareHiggs boson@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-215 days agoAre we looking at different pictures? To me the DMR looks to be a mk14 EBR. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk_14_Enhanced_Battle_Rifle A rifle that is notoriously difficult to accurize being used as a DMR. Not a bad battle rifle per se, but as a DMR it is worse in just about every way than a more modern LR308/AR10, or even an FNAR, etc.
minus-squarethr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·15 days agoquite right, it’s the mk14 my bad
mk16 for DMR - why does this make it the worst?
Are we looking at different pictures? To me the DMR looks to be a mk14 EBR.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk_14_Enhanced_Battle_Rifle
A rifle that is notoriously difficult to accurize being used as a DMR. Not a bad battle rifle per se, but as a DMR it is worse in just about every way than a more modern LR308/AR10, or even an FNAR, etc.
quite right, it’s the mk14 my bad