• Lumbardo@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes. People conducting cutting-edge research should receive suitable compensation. Don’t see a problem with that.

      • Lumbardo@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wasn’t aware that publishing peer-reviewed work for anybody to read was “gatekeeping”.

          • Lumbardo@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Research related to National Defense are usually kept confidential, and corporations have an incentive to not share there research to maintain competitive with their competitors. Neither of these seem out of the ordinary regardless of where you are on the globe.

            Even still. The US government funds various institutions that share their research publicly, so I am not sure where you are really going with this.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        its gatekeeped in alot of ways, its complex issue stemming back to undergrad. not only because of recent anti-science, and anti-dei initiatives, which adds to the problem.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      yea thats the only reason, just higher salary only if it matches the HCOL in there area, otherwise they wouldnt have come here.