Summary

Trump warned automakers not to raise prices after announcing a 25% tariff on imported vehicles starting April 3, claiming the tariffs would be “great” and benefit U.S. manufacturing.

Industry leaders, including GM, Ford, and Stellantis CEOs, expressed concerns about inevitable price increases, with experts warning tariffs could add thousands to car costs.

Auto suppliers stated that absorbing tariffs is impossible, and dealers fear affordability challenges for consumers.

While the United Auto Workers union support the move as a job creator, trade groups predict higher prices and fewer manufacturing jobs.

  • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    unions

    Article only says the UAW, which has more retired members than it does active, and a pathetically small percentage of the active automotive workforce.

    I’m not super well versed in “healthy union demographics”, but a quick wikipedia perusal says the three largest US unions (National education association, service employee international union, and the american federation of state, county, and municipal employees) have between 2-15% retirees.

    Something tells me the UAW is just led by chuds but what do I know?

    • brendansimms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      It seemed odd to me to that Shawn Fain would throw support behind tariffs, but it does make sense in this way: “free-trade” agreements allowed US mftr companies to move manufacturing outside the US, where they could pay employees way less while still charging huge markups while selling inside the us, and the c-suite pockets the surplus. The new tariffs '‘supposedly’ should encourage companies to bring manufacturing jobs back to the states, which is in line with the goals of the UAW - improve working conditions and encourage job growth in the auto sector in the US. So even if the real end result of the tariffs is that companies just continue to overcharge and screw people over and find ways to avoid paying fair wages (which is clearly whats going to happen), the alleged goals of the tariffs are in line with UAW goals…but its still bad optics for Shawn Fain to agree with Trump on anything for a siginificant amount of UAW members, especially since UAW now includes a lot of college/university/education/science sector members as well

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      I thought that couldn’t be true, but yeah, you’re right. Over 400,000 active members and more than 580,000 retired members. Odd.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Why is that odd? It makes sense that as the automotive industry has increasingly become automated, there would be less of a need for human labor.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          And since auto jobs have been exported to Mexico since NAFTA.

          And since the auto sector is more than a century old.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            And since auto jobs have been exported to Mexico since NAFTA.

            The big 3, sure. But there’s many automakers who still do manufacturing in the US- Toyota, VW, Rivian, and Tesla (lol) come to mind. However, they’re also building those plants in the South because of crap labor protections for workers and no unions.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      UAW also represents DoD workers, which has a lot of (retired) veterans on it’s roster. I don’t know if that’s skewing the numbers but something to consider.