• Jehuty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    3 days ago

    SO many corporate/govt websites do this. My health insurance and credit card company do it. It’s mind boggling. I always keep some variation of Chromium installed to deal with it and then go back to LibreWolf.

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’ve not used LibreWolf, but assuming that Firefox addons are generally compatible, it might be worth trying Chrome Mask. It’s made by a Mozilla employee.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Holy shit, Canon convinced you to install a mobile app? Who’s holding the gun to your head? We’ll dispatch authorities as soon as possible.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Revolut business is the same. Somehow you must have chrome on mobile if you want to send a bank transfer from desktop. (It opens a qr code that when scanned, only works with Google Chrome and not any other chromium browser)

  • longjohnjohnson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Typically they have a dependency on something only one browser can do, and rather than using a polyfill or a better browser, force their bad technical decisions onto the user.

    • ewenak@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair some things can’t be polyfilled, like the WebUSB API, as someone mentioned in the comments. But lots of the sites could fix their code so it works on Firefox, yeah.

  • Gagootron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That reminds me of PayPal. I can’t use my hardware sevurity key to log in on mobile… Unless I enable desktop mode in firefox. Then it works

  • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ecobee also requires chrome, but had a work around. Not sure if it’ll work here, but ecobee said to hit the 3 dot menu and choose open in app after the login failed and that logged you in.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wait, what exactly does Ecobee require chrome for? I was looking to replace my Nest thermostat with an Ecobee.

      • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Logging in via the app. It launches the browser. If using Firefox you have to do the extra step I mentioned.

        Here’s the screen.

          • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s really not bad. Sign in, goes to a page that just says not found. 3 dot>open in app and you’re in.

            • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              If I can’t control something 100% local, I don’t buy it. If it requires an online account in any way, it’s trash.

              • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t recall if it was mandatory during setup or not. I can control it locally when the internet is down, at least from the wall, I don’t think the app would work. But again, I wanted the remote features so I didn’t even try to set it up without an account.

                Home assistant may work as well, but I don’t use it.

  • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just downloaded firefox focus, and etsy wont let me log in with it because it has adblocking. even to track a shipment. They even stopped putting the tracking number in the shipment email so i cant go directly to usps. Im sick of being railroaded into giving up my privacy.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have an very long blacklist of companies for this reason.

      The problem with standing up for your privacy is that it massively diminishes the resources available to you. I’m down to shopping at Costco as a single adult, because I had to say fuck you to Target recently, and my local grocery store was busy doing anti-union bullshit at the same time. So I’m driving further and probably paying more in the long run.

      But they aren’t principles if you don’t have to give something up to stick by them.

    • Carrot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They aren’t worried about adblocking, but the cookie/tracker blockers that come with adblockers. They gotta know everything about you ya know

    • s08nlql9@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is a native Android app from Canon (not a webpage) requiring to open Chrome instead of my default Firefox app.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          If this was a web view they wouldn’t even need this screen since it could just done in the “app” itself instead of needing to open an external browser.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 days ago

          If this was a web view they wouldn’t even need this screen since it could just done in the “app” itself instead of needing to open an external browser.

      • alfredon996@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I understand, but if the application opens the browser you have to make it believe that it is opening Chrome

        • ewenak@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          But you can’t make a native app think it is opening Chrome when it’s opening Firefox with just an extension. The extension only changes things inside the browser, but the Canon app probably checks the app ID of the browser it’s opening, which is done at the level of the Android system, and which is not affected by the extension.

          • alfredon996@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            For that you need a ROM that supports signature spoofing, but it should be possible, just not for the common user, sadly

            • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I don’t think that app check signature or so. Its probably checking if app exist or not. Except if the app launches chrome by its indent action instead of normal link opening method

  • sasquash@sopuli.xyz
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    2 days ago

    always give a bad rating and if possible create a support request. let them know.