• wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I probably don’t care about those plants or anything they depend on.

    At least not enough to think mosquitoes are worth it.

    I couldn’t give less of a fuck about roaches, they ain’t bother me, I ain’t bother them. But mosquitoes? Purpose of no purpose, fuck them right to hell.

  • flora_explora@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    How do you define “wasp” though? All Hymenoptera? All Apocrita? All Apocrita minus Apoidea and/or Formicidae? All Vespoidea (minus Formicidae?)? Only Vespidae?

    What about all the parasitic wasps? All fig trees would die and with them whole food webs. And if all the parasitic wasps that hold other organisms in check would die, this would also lead to a total disruption of so many biomes…

  • Klnsfw 🏳️‍🌈@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Species do not exist for a purpose. They are important in their ecosystem, that’s all.

    And even if they don’t have a role, that doesn’t make their existence any less valuable.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    How many species of birds and bats eat just mosquitoes though, or a high enough percentage that they would go extinct rather than shift to rely more on their other prey species, even if at a smaller population? And are those particular species of birds and bats worth the consequences of having mosquitoes?

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Which would maybe force some other animals to change their behaviour slightly more, which in turn affects yet other species. And so the butterfly effect rolls on.

      Or it doesn’t and the system stabilises in another state. Who knows, can we actually know it with a high enough certainty or are the dependencies and behavioural guesses too complex?

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        I mean, has the system ever not eventually stabilized in another state? The fact that we have had extinctions, quite a lot of them even involving most species that have ever existed, and yet complex life and ecosystems still exist, would suggest that life will find a way to adapt around such a loss given time.

  • randomname@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    If screworms went extinct there wouldn’t be any animals starving… same with a lot of pests. guinea worm for example.

  • RusAD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    I can tolerate most pests, even cockroaches, but I draw the line at bedbugs. Don’t care if they have any purpose, just fuck them

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    As long as these creatures leave me the fuck alone they can stick around

  • Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Some plants would go extinct?

    I feel like that’s a sacrifice I might be willing to make.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Majority of the wasp species did not bother human nor want to be close to human. It’s human that want them dead while entering their territory.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Those bitches fly into my house, that’s their territory? Where’s my territory? Ethiopia?

        • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Few species being especially bad tempered and highly territorial and tend to build a huge nest and you want the whole species all extinct? Who are you? 18th century British?

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s spring (your hemisphere may vary) and time to set out tick tubes!

      Tick tubes are cardboard tubes stuffed with cotton fluff soaked in permethrin. Mice use the cotton to make nests. The permethrin kills ticks on the mice, reducing the tick load of the area. It doesn’t hurt the mice, and is much more targeted than just spraying the whole yard for insects.

  • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    The small section of mosquitoes that bite humans actually don’t serve a critical niche like that, and just spread disease. Why the idea has been floated at sterilizing them.

    • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      There are thousands of species of cockroach on earth, and like a dozen that can be invasive in human homes. It’s okay to kill the invasive ones, there wouldn’t be as many of them in as many places without us anyway.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    i am under the impression that mosquitos, as an invasive species, do not fill an important ecological niche and could go extinct and be replaced by other insects

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      This has been a common sentiment but it hasn’t been proven in any substantial way to my knowledge. I personally doubt it’s accurate. That’s not to say the entire ecosystem would collapse but there would likely be consequences.

      That said, the other commenter is correct that there are many introduced mosquito species that could probably be eradicated from their non-native range without major ecological harm. And the species that are the worst pests in human cities tend to be introduced, so eliminating them might significantly reduce the level of bites and disease transmission for people.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Mosquitos are a nuisance to every mammal, I think if we could talk to animals this is how it would go down

        Human: “So anyways we’ve been mulling over making the mosquito extinct, but it might have some consequences for yo…”

        Mammals: “WTF BRO YOU COULD HAVE DONE THAT THE ENTIRE TIME! WHY TF ARE YOU STILL HERE GET RID OF THOSE FUCKERS!”

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          TBF humans historically have been pretty lax in doing anything simply because it was a good thing to do

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Yeah I mean the ethics of how humans relate to wild mammals are so complicated and confusing that I’m not even going to go there.