• turnip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Did we conclude that, I thought its still heavily debated.

      Some argue in the 50s and 60s the US was spending Europe’s gold to build highways and infrastructure, gifting Americans the wealth with a continuation of the new deal, they then defaulted in 1971 as inflation eroded foreign debt owed.

      Some feel some form of debt accrual is how we derive such a consumption focused standard of living, which is misallocated capital that ends in someone holding the bag when it can’t realistically be paid back, or when population doesn’t grow fast enough like in Japan or most of the developed countries.

  • will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 month ago

    That humans came out of Africa once and then settled the rest of the world. In reality there was a constant migration of humans in and out of Africa for millennia while the rest of the world was being populated (and of course it hasn’t ever stopped since).

    I love how much DNA analysis has completely upended so much “known” archaeology and anthropology from even just a couple decades ago.

      • will_a113@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Gene sequencing wasn’t really a thing (at least an affordable thing) until the 2010s, but once it was widely available archaeologists started using it on pretty much anything they could extract a sample from. Suddenly it became possible to track the migrations of groups over time by tracing gene similarities, determine how much intermarrying there must have been within groups, etc. Even with individual sites it has been used to determine when leadership was hereditary vs not, or how wealth was distributed (by looking at residual food dna on teeth). It really has revolutionized the field and cast a lot of old-school theories (often taken for truth) into the dustbin.

        • dnick@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wonder how many new ones it’s creating.

          Scientist: ‘Look at this science thing that is definitely true because DNA!’ Narrator: ‘It wasn’t true’

            • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Please, it’s only necessary to think about it seriously for a single moment to realize that a school where children are taught “that the earth is 6000 years old” obviously doesn’t exist.

              • dnick@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                Shouldn’t exist. That’s different.

                Their belief system is based on an a being that can’t be sense that banished people to infinite torment for following instincts that he designed them with, then sent part of himself to be tortured and killed as a sacrifice to make up for a curse he put on them, but only if you it was necessary. A ridiculous age of the earth is hardly the craziest thing schools like this teach.

          • Kacarott@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I was also taught this in school, along with many very unscientific things. When they eventually taught us about evolution (they had to because of national curriculum) they couldn’t stop stressing how it was “just an outdated theory” and showed us additional videos which “disproved” it

            • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Come on, I like a good “look at how stupid those Americans are” as much as anyone, but for it to be funny it has to be within the realm of what could possibly be true.

    • toadjones79@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am a Christian and I don’t believe that. I could go on at length about how the Bible doesn’t support that idea.

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    We don’t know what the appendix does, the whole pluto thing, I think the Oxford comma is going out of style, and cursive in general.

    But I love cursive, mine was “very nice” according to my teachers.

      • Widdershins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        My handwriting turned around after I got a fountain pen. I went from doctor to pre-med handwriting. Having to think more about how to form the letters has me taking my time. No need to rush when I’m writing with a fancy pen full of cool ink.

    • SoulWager@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eh, Pluto isn’t really something proven false, just that we found more objects like Pluto that made more sense in their own category. It’s classification, like there weren’t always separate categories for feature films and short films, there wasn’t a separate category for dwarf planets when it was just Pluto.

      Oxford comma is useful. I think what’s getting popular is just complete disregard for spelling and grammar.

  • bonegakrejg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would say “cursive is how adults write, you’ll need to know it”, but that wasn’t true then either.

      • Zouth@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually use it myself sometimes when taking notes. It’s just the natural way to write for me. It’s faster and more space effective.

      • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I cant even read my own cursive from back then.

        Now i know how my teachers felt and why they constantly told me i write unreadablely. Used to be able to read it fluently lol

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      “You need a pen licence because that’s what you use at work”.

      Um no. Secretaries, lawyers and journalists used typewriters and engineers used propelling pencils. Builders had these odd rectangular shaped pencils that could write on anything. Fitters and boilermakers used chalk.

      Only schoolchildren used biros.

    • TheTurner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cursive is such a bad way to write. I used to have to decipher sloppy cursive notes on how to check airplane fixtures. I even learned it in school!

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Good cursive flows very nicely. I got to watch my grandmother’s handwriting deteriorate as the dementia and Alzheimer’s took her. Was always amazed for well she wrote when i was younger, but her handwriting turned pretty incomprehensive as her brain was eaten away by the disease

  • Structure7528@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    In my college Econ 101 class I was taught that “economic liberalism” would lead to political liberalism. I knew that was a myth back then, but my professors insisted. Twenty years later we’ve got economic nationalism and political fascism taking over everywhere.

  • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had a substitute teacher who saw the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth ads against John Kerry and repeated it to the class like it was 100% fact.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 month ago

    That tastes have specific regions on the tongue. We actually had to protest when that shit was taught at our son’s elementary school. Don’t know if it came up for our younger daughter.

    Poor kids at school had old atlases where Germany was still separated. But I guess that’s just obsolete and not false knowledge.

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s a weird thing here. I totally accept that the traditional tongue map is pseudoscience and debunked, but if you’re paying attention to something like wine or good chocolate, letting it spread across your whole tongue really does seem change the flavor and bring new aspects to what you’re tasting.

      My subjective impression is that there is some effect to exposing the whole tongue to a stimulus, and I’d really like to understand it more - but when you search the web, you pretty much just get deconstructive articles about the old model, and not much about what might actually be happening.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I remember that one. We even did an experiment to “prove” it. I was like, “I kinda taste it everywhere”. I don’t remember what the punishment for that one was exactly, but it was pretty severe, and I didn’t do anything wrong.

      • mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I remember getting detention on first grade for telling my classmate that a whale had beached here in finland. It happened, it was on the news. Same thing again after I told my classmate about some asteroid that is going to kill us all. On 6th grade the whole class was given detention for not having music books with us because the teachers had decided to change the schedule that morning.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah, a lot of people seem to become teachers because they like being in a room full of people who won’t question them.

          That particular teacher in the story was also let go at the end of the year, though, related to her treatment of students. It was kind of dramatic.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      What doesn’t help is that plane pilots are basically taught a different version of physics to spare them from liquid dynamics and to see the forces on an aerofoil as independent ones which makes it all pretty confusing for a layperson trying to get a basic understanding of both and marry the two

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Did they finally find that out? Last time I checked even PhDs in aerospace engineering still added “we think” at the end of their explanations.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The wing experiment with hundreds of pressure sensors shows lower pressure on top and more on bottom.

      • 74 183.84@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It is known yeah. Another user commented it. If you take a wing and put it in a wind tunnel you can put sensors in its wake to measure the pressure. By manipulating the fluid flow you can change the pressure. So low pressure on top and high pressure on bottom. Multiply that by the surface area and you get a force. Smaller force on top of the wing, lower force on the bottom of the wing. So the wing goes up. Of course theres some physics going on in the fluid that explains the change in pressure, but this is just a quick and simply-put explanation because I took a fat amount of zquil and am tired.

        Source: Im getting a PhD in aerospace engineering

        Edit: I had to do this in a wind tunnel during one of my undergrad courses. It was fun playing with the wind tunnels, would recommend

        • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          hm, I just read through a few publications pertaining the Navier–Stokes equations and the scientific community still didn’t seem to find out why they’re not 100% accurate even in lab conditions because of threedimensional interference, is that correct?

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    A huge number of aspects of the US’s geopolitical enemies, and its own mythologization of the Founding Fathers and early settlers.

    There was also a really bad political test with liberalism on the left and conservativism on the right, and we had to take a test and put what we got in front of everyone, which was very strange.